Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Martins, Naony Sousa Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Thesis Juris
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/19921
Resumo: The general objective of the present research is the investigation of the reflexes of artificial intelligence in the standardization of the content of the merits of judicial decisions, in order to demonstrate that such techniques are tools that are suitable to limit the procedural space of debate of the controversial points of the demand. The choice of the topic is justified due to its theoretical, practical and current relevance, especially as it is a study aimed at ascertaining whether the use of technology and artificial intelligence constitutes a means of restricting the procedural space for debate on the controversial points of the demand interested parties. There is a summary of cognitio, since the procedural space for debating the controversial points of the demand is limited (and often suppressed), making the extensive argumentative exhaustiveness unfeasible. Through bibliographic and documentary research, it was concluded that the use of artificial intelligence constitutes another technique for proposing an autocratic process model, based on unilateral and solipsist decisions, given that its final recipient is unable to construct discursive- of the final provision of merit.
id UNINOVE-2_a52ee8ab85ea67eb64912b9868502c5d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/19921
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-2
network_name_str Revista Thesis Juris
repository_id_str
spelling Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendiProcessualidade democrática, inteligência artificial, massificação da ratio decidendiparticipated merit formationartificial intelligencedemocratic processdecision standardizationRatio decidendiformação participada do méritointeligência artificialprocesso democráticopadronização decisóriaRatio decidendiThe general objective of the present research is the investigation of the reflexes of artificial intelligence in the standardization of the content of the merits of judicial decisions, in order to demonstrate that such techniques are tools that are suitable to limit the procedural space of debate of the controversial points of the demand. The choice of the topic is justified due to its theoretical, practical and current relevance, especially as it is a study aimed at ascertaining whether the use of technology and artificial intelligence constitutes a means of restricting the procedural space for debate on the controversial points of the demand interested parties. There is a summary of cognitio, since the procedural space for debating the controversial points of the demand is limited (and often suppressed), making the extensive argumentative exhaustiveness unfeasible. Through bibliographic and documentary research, it was concluded that the use of artificial intelligence constitutes another technique for proposing an autocratic process model, based on unilateral and solipsist decisions, given that its final recipient is unable to construct discursive- of the final provision of merit.O objetivo geral da presente pesquisa é a investigação dos reflexos da inteligência artificial na padronização do conteúdo de mérito das decisões judiciais, a fim de demonstrar que tais técnicas são ferramentas que se prestam a limitar o espaço processual de debate dos pontos controversos da demanda. A escolha do tema se justifica em razão da sua relevância teórica, prática e atualidade, especialmente por se tratar de estudo destinado a averiguar se o uso da tecnologia e da inteligência artificial constitui um meio de restringir o espaço processual de debate dos pontos controversos da demanda pelas partes interessadas. Verifica-se a sumarização da cognitio, uma vez que o espaço processual de debate dos pontos controversos da demanda é limitado (e muitas vezes suprimido), inviabilizando a ampla exauriência argumentativa. Por meio das pesquisas bibliográfica e documental, concluiu-se que o uso da inteligência artificial constitui mais uma técnica de proposição de um modelo de processo autocrático, fundado em decisões unilaterais e solipsistas, haja vista que o seu destinatário final fica impossibilitado da construção discursivo-democrática do provimento final de mérito.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2022-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/1992110.5585/rtj.v11i1.19921Revista Thesis Juris; v. 11 n. 1 (2022): (jan./jun.); 114-1352317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/19921/9687Copyright (c) 2022 Fabricio Veiga Costa; Naony Sousa Costa Martinshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Fabricio VeigaMartins, Naony Sousa Costa2022-06-24T11:54:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/19921Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2022-06-24T11:54:06Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
Processualidade democrática, inteligência artificial, massificação da ratio decidendi
title Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
spellingShingle Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
Costa, Fabricio Veiga
participated merit formation
artificial intelligence
democratic process
decision standardization
Ratio decidendi
formação participada do mérito
inteligência artificial
processo democrático
padronização decisória
Ratio decidendi
title_short Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
title_full Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
title_fullStr Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
title_full_unstemmed Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
title_sort Democratic processuality, artificial intelligence, massification of ratio decidendi
author Costa, Fabricio Veiga
author_facet Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Martins, Naony Sousa Costa
author_role author
author2 Martins, Naony Sousa Costa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Martins, Naony Sousa Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv participated merit formation
artificial intelligence
democratic process
decision standardization
Ratio decidendi
formação participada do mérito
inteligência artificial
processo democrático
padronização decisória
Ratio decidendi
topic participated merit formation
artificial intelligence
democratic process
decision standardization
Ratio decidendi
formação participada do mérito
inteligência artificial
processo democrático
padronização decisória
Ratio decidendi
description The general objective of the present research is the investigation of the reflexes of artificial intelligence in the standardization of the content of the merits of judicial decisions, in order to demonstrate that such techniques are tools that are suitable to limit the procedural space of debate of the controversial points of the demand. The choice of the topic is justified due to its theoretical, practical and current relevance, especially as it is a study aimed at ascertaining whether the use of technology and artificial intelligence constitutes a means of restricting the procedural space for debate on the controversial points of the demand interested parties. There is a summary of cognitio, since the procedural space for debating the controversial points of the demand is limited (and often suppressed), making the extensive argumentative exhaustiveness unfeasible. Through bibliographic and documentary research, it was concluded that the use of artificial intelligence constitutes another technique for proposing an autocratic process model, based on unilateral and solipsist decisions, given that its final recipient is unable to construct discursive- of the final provision of merit.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/19921
10.5585/rtj.v11i1.19921
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/19921
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/rtj.v11i1.19921
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/19921/9687
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Fabricio Veiga Costa; Naony Sousa Costa Martins
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Fabricio Veiga Costa; Naony Sousa Costa Martins
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris; v. 11 n. 1 (2022): (jan./jun.); 114-135
2317-3580
reponame:Revista Thesis Juris
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Thesis Juris
collection Revista Thesis Juris
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv thesis@uninove.br
_version_ 1800218169676136448