The irrisory surveillance of sound pollution in the Federal District

• Autor(a) principal: Carmona, Paulo Afonso Cavichioli
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Belinati, Roberlei José Resende
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng; por
• Título da fonte: Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade - GeAS
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/geas/article/view/19797
• topic: Noise pollution; IBRAM; PMDF; Federal District; Noise.; Poluición sonora; IBRAM; PMDF; Distrito Federal; Ruido.; Poluição sonora; IBRAM; PMDF; Distrito Federal; Ruído.

Introduction: Noise pollution is considered the second largest source of pollution in urban centers, although it is still underestimated by the Government. In Europe, on the other hand, ambitious discussions, research and public policies in the face of noise are already a reality.Objective of the Study: This paper presents the negligible inspection of noise pollution in which it is carried out in the Federal District.Methodology/Approach: It was based on the systematic analysis of data obtained through the Federal District's Law on Access to Information, District Law n. 4,990/2012. Data were requested from the Federal District Military Police – PMDF and from the Brasília Environmental Institute – IBRAM.Results and discussion: As a result, it was seen that, in the 2018/2019 biennium, dial 190 registered 72,838 complaints of “automotive loud sound” or 9,289 calls registered as “commercial loud sound”, despite, in the same period, IBRAM having made only 2,952 inspections or drawn up only 801 tax assessments. In this area, enter into the discussion about the possibility of PMDF, an integrating organ of SISNAMA, to actively participate in the inspection and assessment of noise pollution, an activity not performed by the corporation.