Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947 |
Resumo: | This paper investigates research opportunities in an agile software development process according to constructivist performance evaluation lenses, based on a portfolio of 24 scientific articles relevant to the topic. The instrument used to carry out the systemic analysis was the Proknow-C method (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). It was observed in the portfolio that the performance evaluation to measure agility in the context of software development has focused practically on critical success factors and on inflexible models that rank in maturity levels, but without clearly evaluating how much agility is employed. This study addresses relevant research opportunities that seek to identify criteria and to build performance scales for measuring agility based on the values and preferences of the decision makers, who wish to implement the agile philosophy, aligned with the specific strategic of the decision makers objectives and using their singular resources, competences and own organizational culture in order to improve their software development process. |
id |
UNINOVE-4_8995bdc05dd7d9b88678ff3f5ecf26bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/17947 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspectiveOportunidades de pesquisa sobre mensuração de agilidade no desenvolvimento de software: uma perspectiva construtivistaPerformance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; AgilityAvaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C.This paper investigates research opportunities in an agile software development process according to constructivist performance evaluation lenses, based on a portfolio of 24 scientific articles relevant to the topic. The instrument used to carry out the systemic analysis was the Proknow-C method (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). It was observed in the portfolio that the performance evaluation to measure agility in the context of software development has focused practically on critical success factors and on inflexible models that rank in maturity levels, but without clearly evaluating how much agility is employed. This study addresses relevant research opportunities that seek to identify criteria and to build performance scales for measuring agility based on the values and preferences of the decision makers, who wish to implement the agile philosophy, aligned with the specific strategic of the decision makers objectives and using their singular resources, competences and own organizational culture in order to improve their software development process.Este artigo investiga oportunidades de pesquisa em um processo ágil de desenvolvimento de software sob óticas construtivistas de avaliação de desempenho, com base em um portfólio de 24 artigos científicos relevantes ao tema. O instrumento utilizado para realizar a análise sistêmica foi o método Proknow-C (Knowledge Development Process - Construttivist). Observou-se no portfólio que a avaliação de desempenho para medir a agilidade no contexto de desenvolvimento de software tem se focado praticamente em fatores críticos de sucesso e em modelos inflexíveis que se classificam em níveis de maturidade, mas sem avaliar claramente quanta agilidade é empregada. Este estudo aborda oportunidades de pesquisas relevantes que buscam identificar critérios e construir escalas de desempenho para medir agilidade a partir dos valores e preferências dos tomadores de decisão, que desejam implementar a filosofia ágil, alinhada com a estratégia específica dos objetivos dos tomadores de decisão e utilizando seus recursos, competências e cultura organizacional próprias para melhorar seu processo de desenvolvimento de software.Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)Brazil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001.Brasil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de OliveiraCalvetti, Ewerton SaccoBernardes, Mayara Luciada Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin2020-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/1794710.5585/gep.v11i2.17947Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 11, n. 2 (2020): maio/ago.; 37-632236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947/8447https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/downloadSuppFile/17947/14020Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Gestão e Projetoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-15T20:20:41Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/17947Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2021-06-15T20:20:41Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective Oportunidades de pesquisa sobre mensuração de agilidade no desenvolvimento de software: uma perspectiva construtivista |
title |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective |
spellingShingle |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira Performance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; Agility Avaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C. |
title_short |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective |
title_full |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective |
title_fullStr |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective |
title_sort |
Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective |
author |
Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco Bernardes, Mayara Lucia da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco Bernardes, Mayara Lucia da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001. Brasil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco Bernardes, Mayara Lucia da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Performance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; Agility Avaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C. |
topic |
Performance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; Agility Avaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C. |
description |
This paper investigates research opportunities in an agile software development process according to constructivist performance evaluation lenses, based on a portfolio of 24 scientific articles relevant to the topic. The instrument used to carry out the systemic analysis was the Proknow-C method (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). It was observed in the portfolio that the performance evaluation to measure agility in the context of software development has focused practically on critical success factors and on inflexible models that rank in maturity levels, but without clearly evaluating how much agility is employed. This study addresses relevant research opportunities that seek to identify criteria and to build performance scales for measuring agility based on the values and preferences of the decision makers, who wish to implement the agile philosophy, aligned with the specific strategic of the decision makers objectives and using their singular resources, competences and own organizational culture in order to improve their software development process. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947 10.5585/gep.v11i2.17947 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/gep.v11i2.17947 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947/8447 https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/downloadSuppFile/17947/14020 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Gestão e Projetos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Gestão e Projetos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 11, n. 2 (2020): maio/ago.; 37-63 2236-0972 reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
collection |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1797052865208909824 |