Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco, Bernardes, Mayara Lucia, da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947
Resumo: This paper investigates research opportunities in an agile software development process according to constructivist performance evaluation lenses, based on a portfolio of 24 scientific articles relevant to the topic. The instrument used to carry out the systemic analysis was the Proknow-C method (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). It was observed in the portfolio that the performance evaluation to measure agility in the context of software development has focused practically on critical success factors and on inflexible models that rank in maturity levels, but without clearly evaluating how much agility is employed. This study addresses relevant research opportunities that seek to identify criteria and to build performance scales for measuring agility based on the values and preferences of the decision makers, who wish to implement the agile philosophy, aligned with the specific strategic of the decision makers objectives and using their singular resources, competences and own organizational culture in order to improve their software development process.
id UNINOVE-4_8995bdc05dd7d9b88678ff3f5ecf26bd
oai_identifier_str oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/17947
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-4
network_name_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository_id_str
spelling Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspectiveOportunidades de pesquisa sobre mensuração de agilidade no desenvolvimento de software: uma perspectiva construtivistaPerformance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; AgilityAvaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C.This paper investigates research opportunities in an agile software development process according to constructivist performance evaluation lenses, based on a portfolio of 24 scientific articles relevant to the topic. The instrument used to carry out the systemic analysis was the Proknow-C method (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). It was observed in the portfolio that the performance evaluation to measure agility in the context of software development has focused practically on critical success factors and on inflexible models that rank in maturity levels, but without clearly evaluating how much agility is employed. This study addresses relevant research opportunities that seek to identify criteria and to build performance scales for measuring agility based on the values and preferences of the decision makers, who wish to implement the agile philosophy, aligned with the specific strategic of the decision makers objectives and using their singular resources, competences and own organizational culture in order to improve their software development process.Este artigo investiga oportunidades de pesquisa em um processo ágil de desenvolvimento de software sob óticas construtivistas de avaliação de desempenho, com base em um portfólio de 24 artigos científicos relevantes ao tema. O instrumento utilizado para realizar a análise sistêmica foi o método Proknow-C (Knowledge Development Process - Construttivist). Observou-se no portfólio que a avaliação de desempenho para medir a agilidade no contexto de desenvolvimento de software tem se focado praticamente em fatores críticos de sucesso e em modelos inflexíveis que se classificam em níveis de maturidade, mas sem avaliar claramente quanta agilidade é empregada. Este estudo aborda oportunidades de pesquisas relevantes que buscam identificar critérios e construir escalas de desempenho para medir agilidade a partir dos valores e preferências dos tomadores de decisão, que desejam implementar a filosofia ágil, alinhada com a estratégia específica dos objetivos dos tomadores de decisão e utilizando seus recursos, competências e cultura organizacional próprias para melhorar seu processo de desenvolvimento de software.Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)Brazil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001.Brasil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de OliveiraCalvetti, Ewerton SaccoBernardes, Mayara Luciada Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin2020-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/1794710.5585/gep.v11i2.17947Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 11, n. 2 (2020): maio/ago.; 37-632236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947/8447https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/downloadSuppFile/17947/14020Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Gestão e Projetoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-15T20:20:41Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/17947Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2021-06-15T20:20:41Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
Oportunidades de pesquisa sobre mensuração de agilidade no desenvolvimento de software: uma perspectiva construtivista
title Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
spellingShingle Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira
Performance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; Agility
Avaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C.
title_short Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
title_full Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
title_fullStr Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
title_full_unstemmed Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
title_sort Research opportunities about measuring agility in software development: a constructivist perspective
author Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira
author_facet Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira
Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco
Bernardes, Mayara Lucia
da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin
author_role author
author2 Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco
Bernardes, Mayara Lucia
da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Brazil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001.
Brasil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira
Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco
Bernardes, Mayara Lucia
da Silveira, Júlia Fraga Cargnin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Performance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; Agility
Avaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C.
topic Performance evaluation; Agile software development; Decision aiding; Agility
Avaliação de desempenho; Desenvolvimento ágil de software; Apoio à decisão; Agilidade; Proknow-C.
description This paper investigates research opportunities in an agile software development process according to constructivist performance evaluation lenses, based on a portfolio of 24 scientific articles relevant to the topic. The instrument used to carry out the systemic analysis was the Proknow-C method (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). It was observed in the portfolio that the performance evaluation to measure agility in the context of software development has focused practically on critical success factors and on inflexible models that rank in maturity levels, but without clearly evaluating how much agility is employed. This study addresses relevant research opportunities that seek to identify criteria and to build performance scales for measuring agility based on the values and preferences of the decision makers, who wish to implement the agile philosophy, aligned with the specific strategic of the decision makers objectives and using their singular resources, competences and own organizational culture in order to improve their software development process.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947
10.5585/gep.v11i2.17947
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/gep.v11i2.17947
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/17947/8447
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/downloadSuppFile/17947/14020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Gestão e Projetos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Gestão e Projetos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 11, n. 2 (2020): maio/ago.; 37-63
2236-0972
reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
collection Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br
_version_ 1797052865208909824