PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito & Paz |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1426 |
Resumo: | This article begins by conducting an analysis in order to establish an evolution of constitutionalism in Brazilian law after the Federal Constitution of 1988, demonstrating its influences on the legal system, which in a unique way in the world, developed since its first republican constitution a hybrid tradition that it had its origin in the law as the main normative source, but even so, it allowed the control of diffuse and concentrated constitutionality. In this complex of influences, the national legal system adapted systems and institutes and also originally created others. Demonstrating the capacity of national jurists to prepare appeals for better judicial provision. In the search for effectiveness and legal certainty, the Brazilian legislator gradually implemented limiting procedural mechanisms, which aim to create unity in decisions and speed up the provision of jurisdiction. With these mechanisms, it will be possible to develop in the Brazilian legal culture habits of respect for the decisions of the Supreme Courts, including those of recognition and enforcement of personality rights, without the occurrence of contradictory decisions. The purpose of this article is to develop previously with a view of concepts and principles, the reflection and criticisms about the theoretical foundations that support the theme addressed, as an instrument to deepen the improvement of theoretical knowledge in the field of Law, through bibliographic study of books and articles published on the topic, applying the deductive method. Aiming at theoretical knowledge combined with a reflection on the practical importance of the study. |
id |
UNISAL-2_46c5f418ba28c3281035b074e9a14e06 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1426 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISAL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito & Paz |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES EFICÃCIA PROCESSUAL DOS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE BASEADOS NOS PRECEDENTES NORMATIVOSThis article begins by conducting an analysis in order to establish an evolution of constitutionalism in Brazilian law after the Federal Constitution of 1988, demonstrating its influences on the legal system, which in a unique way in the world, developed since its first republican constitution a hybrid tradition that it had its origin in the law as the main normative source, but even so, it allowed the control of diffuse and concentrated constitutionality. In this complex of influences, the national legal system adapted systems and institutes and also originally created others. Demonstrating the capacity of national jurists to prepare appeals for better judicial provision. In the search for effectiveness and legal certainty, the Brazilian legislator gradually implemented limiting procedural mechanisms, which aim to create unity in decisions and speed up the provision of jurisdiction. With these mechanisms, it will be possible to develop in the Brazilian legal culture habits of respect for the decisions of the Supreme Courts, including those of recognition and enforcement of personality rights, without the occurrence of contradictory decisions. The purpose of this article is to develop previously with a view of concepts and principles, the reflection and criticisms about the theoretical foundations that support the theme addressed, as an instrument to deepen the improvement of theoretical knowledge in the field of Law, through bibliographic study of books and articles published on the topic, applying the deductive method. Aiming at theoretical knowledge combined with a reflection on the practical importance of the study.Este artigo começa realizando uma análise com intuito de estabelecer uma evolução do constitucionalismo no direito brasileiro após a Constituição Federal de 1988, demonstrando suas influências sobre o sistema jurÃdico, que de forma singular no mundo, desenvolveu desde a sua primeira constituição republicana um tradição hÃbrida que tinha na origem a lei como fonte normativa principal, mas mesmo assim, possibilitava o controle de constitucionalidade difuso e concentrado. Neste complexo de influências o ordenamento jurÃdico nacional adaptou sistemas e institutos e também criou originariamente outros. Demonstrando a capacidade dos juristas nacionais na elaboração de recursos para uma melhor prestação jurisdicional. Na busca pela efetividade e segurança jurÃdica, o legislador brasileiro, de forma gradual implementou mecanismos processuais limitadores, que tem por finalidade criar unidade nas decisões e acelerar à prestação jurisdicional. Com estes mecanismos será possÃvel desenvolver na cultura jurÃdica brasileira hábitos de respeito à s decisões dos Tribunais Supremos, incluindo as de reconhecimento e efetivação dos direitos da personalidade, sem a ocorrência de decisões contraditórias. O presente artigo tem por finalidade desenvolver previamente com abordagem de conceitos e princÃpios, a reflexão e crÃticas sobre os fundamentos teóricos que sustentam o tema abordado, enquanto instrumento de aprofundamento do aprimoramento de conhecimentos teóricos na área do Direito, por intermédio de estudo bibliográfico de livros e artigos publicados sobre o tema, aplicando-se o método dedutivo. Visando um conhecimento teórico aliado a uma reflexão sobre a importância prática do estudo.Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena2021-09-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/142610.32713/rdp.v1i44.1426Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 44 (2021): Revista Direito & Paz; 207-2302359-503510.32713/rdp.v1i44reponame:Revista Direito & Pazinstname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)instacron:UNISALporhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1426/574Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Pazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Rodrigo Valente Giublin TeixeiraJunior, Afonso Winter Junior2021-09-07T12:52:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1426Revistahttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/ONGhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/oaimestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br2359-50351518-7047opendoar:2021-09-07T12:52:26Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES EFICÃCIA PROCESSUAL DOS DIREITOS DA PERSONALIDADE BASEADOS NOS PRECEDENTES NORMATIVOS |
title |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES |
spellingShingle |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES Teixeira, Rodrigo Valente Giublin Teixeira |
title_short |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES |
title_full |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES |
title_fullStr |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES |
title_sort |
PROCESSUAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS BASED ON PREVIOUS NORMATIVES |
author |
Teixeira, Rodrigo Valente Giublin Teixeira |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Rodrigo Valente Giublin Teixeira Junior, Afonso Winter Junior |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Junior, Afonso Winter Junior |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Rodrigo Valente Giublin Teixeira Junior, Afonso Winter Junior |
description |
This article begins by conducting an analysis in order to establish an evolution of constitutionalism in Brazilian law after the Federal Constitution of 1988, demonstrating its influences on the legal system, which in a unique way in the world, developed since its first republican constitution a hybrid tradition that it had its origin in the law as the main normative source, but even so, it allowed the control of diffuse and concentrated constitutionality. In this complex of influences, the national legal system adapted systems and institutes and also originally created others. Demonstrating the capacity of national jurists to prepare appeals for better judicial provision. In the search for effectiveness and legal certainty, the Brazilian legislator gradually implemented limiting procedural mechanisms, which aim to create unity in decisions and speed up the provision of jurisdiction. With these mechanisms, it will be possible to develop in the Brazilian legal culture habits of respect for the decisions of the Supreme Courts, including those of recognition and enforcement of personality rights, without the occurrence of contradictory decisions. The purpose of this article is to develop previously with a view of concepts and principles, the reflection and criticisms about the theoretical foundations that support the theme addressed, as an instrument to deepen the improvement of theoretical knowledge in the field of Law, through bibliographic study of books and articles published on the topic, applying the deductive method. Aiming at theoretical knowledge combined with a reflection on the practical importance of the study. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1426 10.32713/rdp.v1i44.1426 |
url |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1426 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32713/rdp.v1i44.1426 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1426/574 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Paz info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Paz |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 44 (2021): Revista Direito & Paz; 207-230 2359-5035 10.32713/rdp.v1i44 reponame:Revista Direito & Paz instname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) instacron:UNISAL |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) |
instacron_str |
UNISAL |
institution |
UNISAL |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito & Paz |
collection |
Revista Direito & Paz |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1798042364962406400 |