Language teacher education for rural areas schools in the class struggle: a comparative study of two curricular proposals

• Autor(a) principal: Chaves, Priscila Monteiro
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Dalvi , Maria Amélia, Santos, Silvanete Pereira dos
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online)
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/29931
• topic: Formação por área do conhecimento; Luta de Classes; Linguagens; Licenciatura em Educação do Campo; Formação de Professores; Formación por área de Conocimiento; Graduación en Educación del Campo; Lenguaje; Formación de profesores; Lucha de clases; Formation by fields of knowledge; Rural Education degree; Language; Teacher formation; Class struggle

The present article contextualizes the development of teacher-training colleges in Rural Education in Brazil, and outlines a brief historical overview of their formation according to the fields of knowledge they encompass. Through an exploratory and documentary research, the article carries out an assessment of the Pedagogical Projects from teacher-training colleges in Rural Education at Universidade de Brasília (UnB) and Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Ufes). It provides a comparative study between the curricular components of both colleges in regard to their Languages degree, highlighting their main differences concerning the course load, theoretical background, basic guideline conceptions and programmatic contents. As of the assessment, it also discusses some contradictions and punctuates the main gaps regarding the constitution of a project which aims at the formation of peasantry in the context of class struggle. At last, it reinforces that the denial of a theoretical education both consistent and coherent with the course premises implies on mystifying the possibilities of a counter-hegemonic action, thus hindering the promotion of organic intellectuals from the peasant community and representing a way of denying the possibilities, still very much hampered, of developing any alternatives to the capital.