Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237925 |
Resumo: | One of the main arguments in favor of the metacontingency as a model for explaining social phenomena is that it embraces another kind of selection (cultural selection) beyond natural and operant selection. Despite being emergent on operant processes, it would not be reducible to operant selection. Consequently, cultural selection would demand a conceptual framework of its own, hence the metacontingency. Assuming the existence of another kind of selection is an ontological premise, and that this new process requires its own conceptual framework, because contingency analysis is insufficient to explain it, can be considered an epistemological premise. Our goal in this paper is to argue that the epistemological premise present in the metacontingency literature is wrong. To do so, we present pragmatic reductionism as a model to discuss the possibility of reductive explanations of selection and maintenance of cultural practices from metacontingency to contingency analysis. Based on this framework, we provide examples of pragmatic reductive interpretations, thought experiments, and an analysis of experimental data in which we try to explain away the metacontingency. We conclude that it is possible to pragmatically reduce metacontingency explanations to contingency explanations. That does not, however, invalidate the ontological premise about the existence of different processes related to cultural evolution and selection whatever those might be. It only shows that, if they exist at all, they are not the ones being studied in metacontingency research. |
id |
UNSP_7378f440b936b6dd4fcdc1740b2f3819 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237925 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and MetacontingencyContingencyCultureEmergenceExplanationMetacontingencyReductionismOne of the main arguments in favor of the metacontingency as a model for explaining social phenomena is that it embraces another kind of selection (cultural selection) beyond natural and operant selection. Despite being emergent on operant processes, it would not be reducible to operant selection. Consequently, cultural selection would demand a conceptual framework of its own, hence the metacontingency. Assuming the existence of another kind of selection is an ontological premise, and that this new process requires its own conceptual framework, because contingency analysis is insufficient to explain it, can be considered an epistemological premise. Our goal in this paper is to argue that the epistemological premise present in the metacontingency literature is wrong. To do so, we present pragmatic reductionism as a model to discuss the possibility of reductive explanations of selection and maintenance of cultural practices from metacontingency to contingency analysis. Based on this framework, we provide examples of pragmatic reductive interpretations, thought experiments, and an analysis of experimental data in which we try to explain away the metacontingency. We conclude that it is possible to pragmatically reduce metacontingency explanations to contingency explanations. That does not, however, invalidate the ontological premise about the existence of different processes related to cultural evolution and selection whatever those might be. It only shows that, if they exist at all, they are not the ones being studied in metacontingency research.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Tutorial Education Program (PET) from the Ministry of Education (MEC)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fed Univ Espirito Santo UFES, Dept Social & Dev Psychol, Fernando Ferrari Ave 514,CEMUNI 6, BR-29075910 Vitoria, ES, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilITC Imagine Behav Technol, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2013/17950-1SpringerUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)ITC Imagine Behav TechnolZilio, DiegoCarrara, Kester [UNESP]Leite, Felipe Lustosa2022-11-30T15:19:45Z2022-11-30T15:19:45Z2022-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-zBehavior And Social Issues. New York: Springer, 35 p., 2022.1064-9506http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23792510.1007/s42822-022-00097-zWOS:000807919900001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBehavior And Social Issuesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-09T18:36:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237925Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-09T18:36:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
title |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
spellingShingle |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency Zilio, Diego Contingency Culture Emergence Explanation Metacontingency Reductionism |
title_short |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
title_full |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
title_fullStr |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
title_sort |
Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency |
author |
Zilio, Diego |
author_facet |
Zilio, Diego Carrara, Kester [UNESP] Leite, Felipe Lustosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carrara, Kester [UNESP] Leite, Felipe Lustosa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) ITC Imagine Behav Technol |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zilio, Diego Carrara, Kester [UNESP] Leite, Felipe Lustosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Contingency Culture Emergence Explanation Metacontingency Reductionism |
topic |
Contingency Culture Emergence Explanation Metacontingency Reductionism |
description |
One of the main arguments in favor of the metacontingency as a model for explaining social phenomena is that it embraces another kind of selection (cultural selection) beyond natural and operant selection. Despite being emergent on operant processes, it would not be reducible to operant selection. Consequently, cultural selection would demand a conceptual framework of its own, hence the metacontingency. Assuming the existence of another kind of selection is an ontological premise, and that this new process requires its own conceptual framework, because contingency analysis is insufficient to explain it, can be considered an epistemological premise. Our goal in this paper is to argue that the epistemological premise present in the metacontingency literature is wrong. To do so, we present pragmatic reductionism as a model to discuss the possibility of reductive explanations of selection and maintenance of cultural practices from metacontingency to contingency analysis. Based on this framework, we provide examples of pragmatic reductive interpretations, thought experiments, and an analysis of experimental data in which we try to explain away the metacontingency. We conclude that it is possible to pragmatically reduce metacontingency explanations to contingency explanations. That does not, however, invalidate the ontological premise about the existence of different processes related to cultural evolution and selection whatever those might be. It only shows that, if they exist at all, they are not the ones being studied in metacontingency research. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-30T15:19:45Z 2022-11-30T15:19:45Z 2022-06-08 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z Behavior And Social Issues. New York: Springer, 35 p., 2022. 1064-9506 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237925 10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z WOS:000807919900001 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237925 |
identifier_str_mv |
Behavior And Social Issues. New York: Springer, 35 p., 2022. 1064-9506 10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z WOS:000807919900001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Behavior And Social Issues |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
35 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128192374898688 |