Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mastello, Raíssa Bittar [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Janzantti, Natália Soares [UNESP], Monteiro, Magali [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.007
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172258
Resumo: Sixty-two volatile compounds were identified in orange juice from frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) processing steps using HSSPME-GC-MS in combination with GC-OSME. Twenty-four compounds were perceived by OSME in the juice from the extraction step, twenty-five from the finishing step, nineteen from the 1st stage of evaporator step, nine from the concentration step and fourteen from the blending step. Ethyl butanoate, d-limonene, nonanal, ethyl octanoate and decanal showed major odoriferous importance for the juice from the extraction step. They were also considered to be of major odoriferous importance in the finishing step, apart from nonanal and ethyl octanoate. d-Limonene showed the highest odoriferous intensity in all the steps and it was the only major compound in the 1st stage of evaporator, concentration and blending steps. The majority of compounds showed a decrease in odour intensity during the processing. Principal component analysis showed that syrup, fruity, green, lavender, citrus and green leaf descriptors were reduced during the processing, from the extraction and finishing steps up to the 1st stage of evaporator step, while stink bug increased. Gas and green leaf descriptors were more important to the aroma of the juice from the 1st stage of evaporator, concentration and blending steps, and eucalyptus and plastic to the juice from the extraction and finishing steps. Ten volatile compounds were quantified by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Ethyl butanoate concentration was higher in the finishing step, being strongly reduced in the 1st stage of evaporator step, and β-pinene, myrcene and longifolene were higher in the extraction step. 1-Octanol, linalool, α-terpineol, β-citronellol, perillaldehyde and decanal were higher in the finishing step. All of them showed a decrease in concentration from the extraction and finishing step up to the end of the FCOJ processing, affecting the final product aroma quality.
id UNSP_76340f24edb1546960bfd9de7ec088d3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172258
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processingFCOJ processing stepsGC-olfactometryHS-SPME-GC-MSOrange juiceVolatile compoundsSixty-two volatile compounds were identified in orange juice from frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) processing steps using HSSPME-GC-MS in combination with GC-OSME. Twenty-four compounds were perceived by OSME in the juice from the extraction step, twenty-five from the finishing step, nineteen from the 1st stage of evaporator step, nine from the concentration step and fourteen from the blending step. Ethyl butanoate, d-limonene, nonanal, ethyl octanoate and decanal showed major odoriferous importance for the juice from the extraction step. They were also considered to be of major odoriferous importance in the finishing step, apart from nonanal and ethyl octanoate. d-Limonene showed the highest odoriferous intensity in all the steps and it was the only major compound in the 1st stage of evaporator, concentration and blending steps. The majority of compounds showed a decrease in odour intensity during the processing. Principal component analysis showed that syrup, fruity, green, lavender, citrus and green leaf descriptors were reduced during the processing, from the extraction and finishing steps up to the 1st stage of evaporator step, while stink bug increased. Gas and green leaf descriptors were more important to the aroma of the juice from the 1st stage of evaporator, concentration and blending steps, and eucalyptus and plastic to the juice from the extraction and finishing steps. Ten volatile compounds were quantified by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Ethyl butanoate concentration was higher in the finishing step, being strongly reduced in the 1st stage of evaporator step, and β-pinene, myrcene and longifolene were higher in the extraction step. 1-Octanol, linalool, α-terpineol, β-citronellol, perillaldehyde and decanal were higher in the finishing step. All of them showed a decrease in concentration from the extraction and finishing step up to the end of the FCOJ processing, affecting the final product aroma quality.Department of Food and Nutrition School of Pharmaceutical Sciences São Paulo State University-UNESPDepartment of Food Engineering and Technology IBILCE São Paulo State University-UNESPDepartment of Food and Nutrition School of Pharmaceutical Sciences São Paulo State University-UNESPDepartment of Food Engineering and Technology IBILCE São Paulo State University-UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Mastello, Raíssa Bittar [UNESP]Janzantti, Natália Soares [UNESP]Monteiro, Magali [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:59:24Z2018-12-11T16:59:24Z2015-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article591-598application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.007Food Research International, v. 77, p. 591-598.0963-9969http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17225810.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.0072-s2.0-849489866282-s2.0-84948986628.pdf0628518324010655Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFood Research International1,472info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-21T12:46:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/172258Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-06-21T12:46:31Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
title Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
spellingShingle Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
Mastello, Raíssa Bittar [UNESP]
FCOJ processing steps
GC-olfactometry
HS-SPME-GC-MS
Orange juice
Volatile compounds
title_short Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
title_full Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
title_fullStr Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
title_full_unstemmed Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
title_sort Volatile and odoriferous compounds changes during frozen concentrated orange juice processing
author Mastello, Raíssa Bittar [UNESP]
author_facet Mastello, Raíssa Bittar [UNESP]
Janzantti, Natália Soares [UNESP]
Monteiro, Magali [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Janzantti, Natália Soares [UNESP]
Monteiro, Magali [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mastello, Raíssa Bittar [UNESP]
Janzantti, Natália Soares [UNESP]
Monteiro, Magali [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv FCOJ processing steps
GC-olfactometry
HS-SPME-GC-MS
Orange juice
Volatile compounds
topic FCOJ processing steps
GC-olfactometry
HS-SPME-GC-MS
Orange juice
Volatile compounds
description Sixty-two volatile compounds were identified in orange juice from frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) processing steps using HSSPME-GC-MS in combination with GC-OSME. Twenty-four compounds were perceived by OSME in the juice from the extraction step, twenty-five from the finishing step, nineteen from the 1st stage of evaporator step, nine from the concentration step and fourteen from the blending step. Ethyl butanoate, d-limonene, nonanal, ethyl octanoate and decanal showed major odoriferous importance for the juice from the extraction step. They were also considered to be of major odoriferous importance in the finishing step, apart from nonanal and ethyl octanoate. d-Limonene showed the highest odoriferous intensity in all the steps and it was the only major compound in the 1st stage of evaporator, concentration and blending steps. The majority of compounds showed a decrease in odour intensity during the processing. Principal component analysis showed that syrup, fruity, green, lavender, citrus and green leaf descriptors were reduced during the processing, from the extraction and finishing steps up to the 1st stage of evaporator step, while stink bug increased. Gas and green leaf descriptors were more important to the aroma of the juice from the 1st stage of evaporator, concentration and blending steps, and eucalyptus and plastic to the juice from the extraction and finishing steps. Ten volatile compounds were quantified by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Ethyl butanoate concentration was higher in the finishing step, being strongly reduced in the 1st stage of evaporator step, and β-pinene, myrcene and longifolene were higher in the extraction step. 1-Octanol, linalool, α-terpineol, β-citronellol, perillaldehyde and decanal were higher in the finishing step. All of them showed a decrease in concentration from the extraction and finishing step up to the end of the FCOJ processing, affecting the final product aroma quality.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-01
2018-12-11T16:59:24Z
2018-12-11T16:59:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.007
Food Research International, v. 77, p. 591-598.
0963-9969
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172258
10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.007
2-s2.0-84948986628
2-s2.0-84948986628.pdf
0628518324010655
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.007
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/172258
identifier_str_mv Food Research International, v. 77, p. 591-598.
0963-9969
10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.007
2-s2.0-84948986628
2-s2.0-84948986628.pdf
0628518324010655
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Food Research International
1,472
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 591-598
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803045185896054784