Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225104 |
Resumo: | Innocuous biocompatible materials have been searched to repair or reconstruct bone defects. Their goal is to restore the function of live or dead tissues. This study compared connective tissue and bone reaction when exposed to demineralized bovine bone matrix and a polyurethane resin derived from castor bean (Ricinus communis). Forty-five rats were assigned to 3 groups of 15 animals (control, bovine bone and polyurethane). A cylindrical defect was created on mandible base and filled with bovine bone matrix and the polyurethane. Control group received no treatment. Analyses were performed after 15, 45 and 60 days (5 animals each). Histological analysis revealed connective tissue tolerance to bovine bone with local inflammatory response similar to that of the control group. After 15 days, all groups demonstrated similar outcomes, with mild inflammatory reaction, probably due to the surgical procedure rather than to the material. In the polymer group, after 60 days, scarce multinucleated cells could still be observed. In general, all groups showed good stability and osteogenic connective tissue with blood vessels into the surgical area. The results suggest biocompatibility of both materials, seen by their integration into rat mandible. Moreover, the polyurethane seems to be an alternative in bone reconstruction and it is an inexhaustible source of biomaterial. |
id |
UNSP_7e9654f8bd48638218353620b075969a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225104 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantationBone regenerationBone substitutesRicinus communisInnocuous biocompatible materials have been searched to repair or reconstruct bone defects. Their goal is to restore the function of live or dead tissues. This study compared connective tissue and bone reaction when exposed to demineralized bovine bone matrix and a polyurethane resin derived from castor bean (Ricinus communis). Forty-five rats were assigned to 3 groups of 15 animals (control, bovine bone and polyurethane). A cylindrical defect was created on mandible base and filled with bovine bone matrix and the polyurethane. Control group received no treatment. Analyses were performed after 15, 45 and 60 days (5 animals each). Histological analysis revealed connective tissue tolerance to bovine bone with local inflammatory response similar to that of the control group. After 15 days, all groups demonstrated similar outcomes, with mild inflammatory reaction, probably due to the surgical procedure rather than to the material. In the polymer group, after 60 days, scarce multinucleated cells could still be observed. In general, all groups showed good stability and osteogenic connective tissue with blood vessels into the surgical area. The results suggest biocompatibility of both materials, seen by their integration into rat mandible. Moreover, the polyurethane seems to be an alternative in bone reconstruction and it is an inexhaustible source of biomaterial.Department of Diagnosis and Surgery Dental School of Araraquara São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SPDepartment of Morphology Dental School of Araraquara São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SPDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Dental School of Araraquara São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SPDepartment of Morphology Dental School of Araraquara São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Leite, Fábio Renato Manzolli [UNESP]Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo De Oliveira [UNESP]2022-04-28T20:39:38Z2022-04-28T20:39:38Z2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article122-126http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 16, n. 2, p. 122-126, 2008.1678-77651678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22510410.1590/S1678-775720080002000082-s2.0-42049106584Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T15:15:10Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/225104Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T15:15:10Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
spellingShingle |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation Leite, Fábio Renato Manzolli [UNESP] Bone regeneration Bone substitutes Ricinus communis |
title_short |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_full |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_fullStr |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_sort |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
author |
Leite, Fábio Renato Manzolli [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Leite, Fábio Renato Manzolli [UNESP] Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo De Oliveira [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo De Oliveira [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leite, Fábio Renato Manzolli [UNESP] Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo De Oliveira [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bone regeneration Bone substitutes Ricinus communis |
topic |
Bone regeneration Bone substitutes Ricinus communis |
description |
Innocuous biocompatible materials have been searched to repair or reconstruct bone defects. Their goal is to restore the function of live or dead tissues. This study compared connective tissue and bone reaction when exposed to demineralized bovine bone matrix and a polyurethane resin derived from castor bean (Ricinus communis). Forty-five rats were assigned to 3 groups of 15 animals (control, bovine bone and polyurethane). A cylindrical defect was created on mandible base and filled with bovine bone matrix and the polyurethane. Control group received no treatment. Analyses were performed after 15, 45 and 60 days (5 animals each). Histological analysis revealed connective tissue tolerance to bovine bone with local inflammatory response similar to that of the control group. After 15 days, all groups demonstrated similar outcomes, with mild inflammatory reaction, probably due to the surgical procedure rather than to the material. In the polymer group, after 60 days, scarce multinucleated cells could still be observed. In general, all groups showed good stability and osteogenic connective tissue with blood vessels into the surgical area. The results suggest biocompatibility of both materials, seen by their integration into rat mandible. Moreover, the polyurethane seems to be an alternative in bone reconstruction and it is an inexhaustible source of biomaterial. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 2022-04-28T20:39:38Z 2022-04-28T20:39:38Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 16, n. 2, p. 122-126, 2008. 1678-7765 1678-7757 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225104 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 2-s2.0-42049106584 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225104 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 16, n. 2, p. 122-126, 2008. 1678-7765 1678-7757 10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 2-s2.0-42049106584 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
122-126 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546497839464448 |