Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15917 |
Resumo: | Innocuous biocompatible materials have been searched to repair or reconstruct bone defects. Their goal is to restore the function of live or dead tissues. This study compared connective tissue and bone reaction when exposed to demineralized bovine bone matrix and a polyurethane resin derived from castor bean (Ricinus communis). Forty-five rats were assigned to 3 groups of 15 animals (control, bovine bone and polyurethane). A cylindrical defect was created on mandible base and filled with bovine bone matrix and the polyurethane. Control group received no treatment. Analyses were performed after 15, 45 and 60 days (5 animals each). Histological analysis revealed connective tissue tolerance to bovine bone with local inflammatory response similar to that of the control group. After 15 days, all groups demonstrated similar outcomes, with mild inflammatory reaction, probably due to the surgical procedure rather than to the material. In the polymer group, after 60 days, scarce multinucleated cells could still be observed. In general, all groups showed good stability and osteogenic connective tissue with blood vessels into the surgical area. The results suggest biocompatibility of both materials, seen by their integration into rat mandible. Moreover, the polyurethane seems to be an alternative in bone reconstruction and it is an inexhaustible source of biomaterial. |
id |
UNSP_a1c2c578971464869da355a10f9ace13 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15917 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantationbone regenerationRicinus communisbone substitutesInnocuous biocompatible materials have been searched to repair or reconstruct bone defects. Their goal is to restore the function of live or dead tissues. This study compared connective tissue and bone reaction when exposed to demineralized bovine bone matrix and a polyurethane resin derived from castor bean (Ricinus communis). Forty-five rats were assigned to 3 groups of 15 animals (control, bovine bone and polyurethane). A cylindrical defect was created on mandible base and filled with bovine bone matrix and the polyurethane. Control group received no treatment. Analyses were performed after 15, 45 and 60 days (5 animals each). Histological analysis revealed connective tissue tolerance to bovine bone with local inflammatory response similar to that of the control group. After 15 days, all groups demonstrated similar outcomes, with mild inflammatory reaction, probably due to the surgical procedure rather than to the material. In the polymer group, after 60 days, scarce multinucleated cells could still be observed. In general, all groups showed good stability and osteogenic connective tissue with blood vessels into the surgical area. The results suggest biocompatibility of both materials, seen by their integration into rat mandible. Moreover, the polyurethane seems to be an alternative in bone reconstruction and it is an inexhaustible source of biomaterial.São Paulo State Univ, Dent Sch Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSão Paulo State Univ, Dent Sch Araraquara, Dept Morphol, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSão Paulo State Univ, Dent Sch Araraquara, Dept Diag & Surg, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSão Paulo State Univ, Dent Sch Araraquara, Dept Morphol, Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de BauruUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Manzolli Leite, Fabio Renato [UNESP]de Oliveira Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo [UNESP]2013-09-30T18:33:21Z2014-05-20T13:45:17Z2013-09-30T18:33:21Z2014-05-20T13:45:17Z2008-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article122-126application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 16, n. 2, p. 122-126, 2008.1678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15917S1678-77572008000200008WOS:000256795700008S1678-77572008000200008.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Oral Science1.7090,645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T15:14:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15917Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T15:14:59Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
spellingShingle |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation Manzolli Leite, Fabio Renato [UNESP] bone regeneration Ricinus communis bone substitutes |
title_short |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_full |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_fullStr |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
title_sort |
Bone regeneration after demineralized bone matrix and castor oil (Ricinus communis) polyurethane implantation |
author |
Manzolli Leite, Fabio Renato [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Manzolli Leite, Fabio Renato [UNESP] de Oliveira Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Oliveira Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Manzolli Leite, Fabio Renato [UNESP] de Oliveira Ramalho, Lizeti Toledo [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bone regeneration Ricinus communis bone substitutes |
topic |
bone regeneration Ricinus communis bone substitutes |
description |
Innocuous biocompatible materials have been searched to repair or reconstruct bone defects. Their goal is to restore the function of live or dead tissues. This study compared connective tissue and bone reaction when exposed to demineralized bovine bone matrix and a polyurethane resin derived from castor bean (Ricinus communis). Forty-five rats were assigned to 3 groups of 15 animals (control, bovine bone and polyurethane). A cylindrical defect was created on mandible base and filled with bovine bone matrix and the polyurethane. Control group received no treatment. Analyses were performed after 15, 45 and 60 days (5 animals each). Histological analysis revealed connective tissue tolerance to bovine bone with local inflammatory response similar to that of the control group. After 15 days, all groups demonstrated similar outcomes, with mild inflammatory reaction, probably due to the surgical procedure rather than to the material. In the polymer group, after 60 days, scarce multinucleated cells could still be observed. In general, all groups showed good stability and osteogenic connective tissue with blood vessels into the surgical area. The results suggest biocompatibility of both materials, seen by their integration into rat mandible. Moreover, the polyurethane seems to be an alternative in bone reconstruction and it is an inexhaustible source of biomaterial. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-03-01 2013-09-30T18:33:21Z 2013-09-30T18:33:21Z 2014-05-20T13:45:17Z 2014-05-20T13:45:17Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 16, n. 2, p. 122-126, 2008. 1678-7757 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15917 S1678-77572008000200008 WOS:000256795700008 S1678-77572008000200008.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15917 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science. Bauru-sp: Univ São Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauru, v. 16, n. 2, p. 122-126, 2008. 1678-7757 S1678-77572008000200008 WOS:000256795700008 S1678-77572008000200008.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science 1.709 0,645 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
122-126 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546433486258176 |