One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416 |
Resumo: | To evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus. |
id |
UNSP_92a8374aec40dfa92c9b8f2c2d8718e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219416 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorationsTo evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus.Department of Restorative Sciences 8-450 Moos Tower University of Minnesota, 515 SE Delaware St., Minneapolis, MN 55455Division of Operative Dentistry Department of Restorative Sciences University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNDepartment of Operative Dentistry University of Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, SPUNESP, São José dos Campos, SPDepartment of Operative Dentistry University Bandeirante de São Paulo, São Paulo, SPBrazilian Army Dental Corps.Department of Operative Dentistry UNIBANDepartment of Operative Dentistry University of Mogi das CruzesDepartment of Biomaterials UNIBANUNESP, São José dos Campos, SPUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of Mogi das CruzesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University Bandeirante de São PauloBrazilian Army Dental Corps.UNIBANPerdigão, JorgeDutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]Castilhos, Natália [UNESP]Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP]Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP]Cordeiro, Hiram J. D.Amore, RicardoLewgoy, Hugo R.2022-04-28T18:55:33Z2022-04-28T18:55:33Z2007-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article125-133American Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007.0894-8275http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2194162-s2.0-34249687066Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Journal of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:55:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219416Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:29:39.369200Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
title |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
spellingShingle |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations Perdigão, Jorge |
title_short |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
title_full |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
title_fullStr |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
title_full_unstemmed |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
title_sort |
One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations |
author |
Perdigão, Jorge |
author_facet |
Perdigão, Jorge Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP] Castilhos, Natália [UNESP] Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP] Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP] Cordeiro, Hiram J. D. Amore, Ricardo Lewgoy, Hugo R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP] Castilhos, Natália [UNESP] Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP] Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP] Cordeiro, Hiram J. D. Amore, Ricardo Lewgoy, Hugo R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Minnesota University of Mogi das Cruzes Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) University Bandeirante de São Paulo Brazilian Army Dental Corps. UNIBAN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Perdigão, Jorge Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP] Castilhos, Natália [UNESP] Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP] Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP] Cordeiro, Hiram J. D. Amore, Ricardo Lewgoy, Hugo R. |
description |
To evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-04-01 2022-04-28T18:55:33Z 2022-04-28T18:55:33Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
American Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007. 0894-8275 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416 2-s2.0-34249687066 |
identifier_str_mv |
American Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007. 0894-8275 2-s2.0-34249687066 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
American Journal of Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
125-133 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128660226441216 |