Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240375 |
Resumo: | The mistaken view that Taylorism-Fordism characterizes the most advanced form of the capitalist labor process reinforces an equally mistaken view of the relationship between capitalism and technology, known as ‘criticism of the productive forces’, which was very much in evidence in critical thinking throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Based on an analysis of three articles by a representative author of contemporary Marxist reflections upon the labor process, David Spencer, we will endeavor to show that these misconceptions remain extremely current, leading to an attitude that can be characterized as ‘Marxism-Luddism’. Given this outlook, the post-capitalist notion of labor as a fulfilling and free activity can only be understood as a ‘social epiphany’. We attempt to supersede this ‘social epiphany’ by identifying the opportunities generated by capitalism, and, from there, point out the fundamental theoretical locus for the future relevance of the critique of capitalism. |
id |
UNSP_eab031616fd6debc1852e28abe355381 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240375 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capitalcapitalismLabor processMarxismpost-capitalismproductive forcesThe mistaken view that Taylorism-Fordism characterizes the most advanced form of the capitalist labor process reinforces an equally mistaken view of the relationship between capitalism and technology, known as ‘criticism of the productive forces’, which was very much in evidence in critical thinking throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Based on an analysis of three articles by a representative author of contemporary Marxist reflections upon the labor process, David Spencer, we will endeavor to show that these misconceptions remain extremely current, leading to an attitude that can be characterized as ‘Marxism-Luddism’. Given this outlook, the post-capitalist notion of labor as a fulfilling and free activity can only be understood as a ‘social epiphany’. We attempt to supersede this ‘social epiphany’ by identifying the opportunities generated by capitalism, and, from there, point out the fundamental theoretical locus for the future relevance of the critique of capitalism.UNESP – São Paulo State UniversityUNESP – São Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Neto, Benedito [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:14:21Z2023-03-01T20:14:21Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article155-166http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534Critique (United Kingdom), v. 50, n. 1, p. 155-166, 2022.1748-86050301-7605http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24037510.1080/03017605.2022.20505342-s2.0-85133231558Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCritique (United Kingdom)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:14:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240375Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:49:49.068756Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
title |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
spellingShingle |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital Neto, Benedito [UNESP] capitalism Labor process Marxism post-capitalism productive forces |
title_short |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
title_full |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
title_fullStr |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
title_sort |
Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital |
author |
Neto, Benedito [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Neto, Benedito [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neto, Benedito [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
capitalism Labor process Marxism post-capitalism productive forces |
topic |
capitalism Labor process Marxism post-capitalism productive forces |
description |
The mistaken view that Taylorism-Fordism characterizes the most advanced form of the capitalist labor process reinforces an equally mistaken view of the relationship between capitalism and technology, known as ‘criticism of the productive forces’, which was very much in evidence in critical thinking throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Based on an analysis of three articles by a representative author of contemporary Marxist reflections upon the labor process, David Spencer, we will endeavor to show that these misconceptions remain extremely current, leading to an attitude that can be characterized as ‘Marxism-Luddism’. Given this outlook, the post-capitalist notion of labor as a fulfilling and free activity can only be understood as a ‘social epiphany’. We attempt to supersede this ‘social epiphany’ by identifying the opportunities generated by capitalism, and, from there, point out the fundamental theoretical locus for the future relevance of the critique of capitalism. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 2023-03-01T20:14:21Z 2023-03-01T20:14:21Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534 Critique (United Kingdom), v. 50, n. 1, p. 155-166, 2022. 1748-8605 0301-7605 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240375 10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534 2-s2.0-85133231558 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240375 |
identifier_str_mv |
Critique (United Kingdom), v. 50, n. 1, p. 155-166, 2022. 1748-8605 0301-7605 10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534 2-s2.0-85133231558 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Critique (United Kingdom) |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
155-166 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129362948521984 |