INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Landenberger, Thaís
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cardoso, Nicolas de Oliveira, de Oliveira, Camila Rosa, Argimon, Irani Iracema de Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
Texto Completo: http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655
Resumo: The Cognitive Reserve (CR) construct seeks to explain the brain’s ability of compensate for degeneration caused by age or neuropathology. However, standardized measures of CR are incipient. Through a systematic review, this study aimed to investigate the instruments in the form of scales and questionnaires used as objective measures of CR, through the measurement of multiple variables related to activities conducted throughout the lifetime. The search for articles was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, PsycINFO, VHL and Cochrane databases. Seven studies were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The existence of five scales/questionnaires that measure CR was verified. The instruments present a short duration, however, they vary in the items/variables measured, there being a lack of in-depth studies with large and diversified samples. Further studies are needed to improve the validity evidence and to conduct cross-cultural adaptations of the CR scale/questionnaires
id UPM-1_c84b55fc33dc3cd8136b4928ccdb2355
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/11655
network_acronym_str UPM-1
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEWINSTRUMENTOS DE MEDIDA DE RESERVA COGNITIVA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICAInstrumentos de Medida de Reserva Cognitiva: Uma Revisão Sistemática reserva cognitiva; instrumentos de medida; avaliação; escala/ questionários; cogniçãoreserva cognitiva; instrumentos psicométricos; evaluación; escalas/ cuestionarios; cognicióncognitive reserve; measurement instruments; evaluation; scales/ questionnaires; cognitionThe Cognitive Reserve (CR) construct seeks to explain the brain’s ability of compensate for degeneration caused by age or neuropathology. However, standardized measures of CR are incipient. Through a systematic review, this study aimed to investigate the instruments in the form of scales and questionnaires used as objective measures of CR, through the measurement of multiple variables related to activities conducted throughout the lifetime. The search for articles was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, PsycINFO, VHL and Cochrane databases. Seven studies were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The existence of five scales/questionnaires that measure CR was verified. The instruments present a short duration, however, they vary in the items/variables measured, there being a lack of in-depth studies with large and diversified samples. Further studies are needed to improve the validity evidence and to conduct cross-cultural adaptations of the CR scale/questionnairesEl constructo reserva cognitiva (RC) busca explicar la capacidad del cerebro para compensar el declive causado por la edad o neuropatología. Además, las escalas estandarizadas de RC son aún incipientes. La presente revisión sistemática tuvo como objetivo investigar los instrumentos utilizados para medir objetivamente la RC, a partir de la evaluación de diversas variables asociadas con actividades realizadas a lo largo de la vida. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PsychINFO, BVS y Cochrane. Después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión siete artículos fueron seleccionados. Se identificaron cinco instrumentos que miden RC. Se identificó la existencia de cinco escalas/cuestionarios que miden RC. Los instrumentos son de corta duración, pero varían en cuanto a los ítems/variables analizadas y carecen de estudios en profundidad, con muestras amplias y diversificadas. Se necesitan más estudios que busquen mejorar las evidencias de validez, así como realizar adaptaciones transculturales de las escalas/ los cuestionarios de RC.O construto Reserva cognitiva (RC) busca explicar a capacidade do cérebro em compensar a degeneração causada pela idade ou neuropatologia. Contudo, medidas padronizadas de RC são incipientes. Por meio de uma revisão sistemática, este estudo objetivou investigar os instrumentos em formato de escalas e questionários utilizados como medida objetiva de RC, a partir da mensuração de múltiplas variáveis relacionadas a atividades realizadas ao longo da vida. A busca por artigos foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, PsychInfo, Bvs e Cochrane. Sete estudos foram selecionados após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Constatou-se a existência de cinco escalas/questionários que mensuram RC. Os instrumentos são de curta duração, porém, variam quanto aos itens/variáveis mensuradas e carecem de estudos aprofundados, com amostras amplas e diversificadas. São necessários mais estudos que busquem aprimorar as evidências de validade e realizar adaptações transculturais das escalas/questionários de RC.Editora Mackenzie2019-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAPapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/1165510.5935/1980-6906/psicologia. v21n2p58-74The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2019); 41-74Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2019); 41-74Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 21 n. 2 (2019); 41-741980-69061516-3687reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)instacron:UPMporenghttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655/7673http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655/7674Copyright (c) 2019 Thaís Landenberger, Nicolas de Oliveira Cardoso, Camila Rosa de Oliveira, Irani Iracema de Lima Argimonhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLandenberger, ThaísCardoso, Nicolas de Oliveirade Oliveira, Camila RosaArgimon, Irani Iracema de Lima2023-07-25T17:04:29Zoai:ojs.editorarevistas.mackenzie.br:article/11655Revistahttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/indexPRIhttp://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/oairevistapsico@mackenzie.br1980-69061516-3687opendoar:2023-07-25T17:04:29Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDIDA DE RESERVA COGNITIVA: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA
Instrumentos de Medida de Reserva Cognitiva: Uma Revisão Sistemática
title INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
spellingShingle INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Landenberger, Thaís
reserva cognitiva;
instrumentos de medida;
avaliação;
escala/ questionários;
cognição
reserva cognitiva;
instrumentos psicométricos;
evaluación;
escalas/ cuestionarios;
cognición
cognitive reserve;
measurement instruments;
evaluation;
scales/ questionnaires;
cognition
title_short INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_full INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_fullStr INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_sort INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING COGNITIVE RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
author Landenberger, Thaís
author_facet Landenberger, Thaís
Cardoso, Nicolas de Oliveira
de Oliveira, Camila Rosa
Argimon, Irani Iracema de Lima
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Nicolas de Oliveira
de Oliveira, Camila Rosa
Argimon, Irani Iracema de Lima
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Landenberger, Thaís
Cardoso, Nicolas de Oliveira
de Oliveira, Camila Rosa
Argimon, Irani Iracema de Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv reserva cognitiva;
instrumentos de medida;
avaliação;
escala/ questionários;
cognição
reserva cognitiva;
instrumentos psicométricos;
evaluación;
escalas/ cuestionarios;
cognición
cognitive reserve;
measurement instruments;
evaluation;
scales/ questionnaires;
cognition
topic reserva cognitiva;
instrumentos de medida;
avaliação;
escala/ questionários;
cognição
reserva cognitiva;
instrumentos psicométricos;
evaluación;
escalas/ cuestionarios;
cognición
cognitive reserve;
measurement instruments;
evaluation;
scales/ questionnaires;
cognition
description The Cognitive Reserve (CR) construct seeks to explain the brain’s ability of compensate for degeneration caused by age or neuropathology. However, standardized measures of CR are incipient. Through a systematic review, this study aimed to investigate the instruments in the form of scales and questionnaires used as objective measures of CR, through the measurement of multiple variables related to activities conducted throughout the lifetime. The search for articles was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, PsycINFO, VHL and Cochrane databases. Seven studies were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The existence of five scales/questionnaires that measure CR was verified. The instruments present a short duration, however, they vary in the items/variables measured, there being a lack of in-depth studies with large and diversified samples. Further studies are needed to improve the validity evidence and to conduct cross-cultural adaptations of the CR scale/questionnaires
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
AP
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655
10.5935/1980-6906/psicologia. v21n2p58-74
url http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655
identifier_str_mv 10.5935/1980-6906/psicologia. v21n2p58-74
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655/7673
http://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/ptp/article/view/11655/7674
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mackenzie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv The Journal Of Psychology: Theory and Practice ; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2019); 41-74
Revista Psicología: Teoría y Práctica; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2019); 41-74
Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática; v. 21 n. 2 (2019); 41-74
1980-6906
1516-3687
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
instname:Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron:UPM
instname_str Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
instacron_str UPM
institution UPM
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Online) - Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistapsico@mackenzie.br
_version_ 1797051378265227264