Conflito de interesses nas sociedades por ações

• Autor(a) principal: Zeger, Arthur
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
• Texto Completo: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23738
• topic: conflito de interesses; benefício particular; sociedade por ações (ou sociedade anônima); direito de voto; voto abusivo; abuso de poder econômico; direito comparado; conflict of interest; private benefit; corporation (or joint stock corporation); voting rights; abusing of voting rights; abuse of economic power; comparative law; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

In this paper we addressed the theme of the conflict of interest within the Brazilian corporations. It was also covered, reflexively, the discipline of the particular benefit . To address the systemic study of the chosen theme, we started the studies analyzing its proximity with the line of research economic power and legal limitations, starting from he notion of the economic analysis of law. In structuring this paper it were also addressed other topics such as the importance of voting rights (including the absenteism, the abuse of voting rights, the restrictions on voting rights, the difference between abuse and the conflict of interest). It was also explored the legal treatment given to conflicts of interest according to the comparative law; in this regard, we made an approach of the German, Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese legal systems. Finally, we make use of decisions from the CVM (Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission), CRSFN (Appeals Council of the National Financial System) and the Brazilian courts to illustrate the current stage of the administrative jurisprudential understanding on the subject hereof. In essence, this paper intends to contribute with the systematic study of the conflict of interests of shareholders and officers of Brazilian corporations, identifying assumptions that are underlying the existing doctrines and contrasting the treatment given to the conflicts of interest that shareholders and officers have against the companies and between themselves.