Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientiae Studia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845 |
Resumo: | This article is a contribution to the critical sociology of science perspective introduced and developed by Pierre Bourdieu. The paper proposes a transversalist theory of science and technology production and diffusion. It is here argued that science and technology are comprised of multiple regimes where each regime is historically grounded, possesses its own division of labour, modes of cognitive and artifact production and has specific audiences. The major regimes include the disciplinary regime, utilitarian regime, transitory regime and research-technology regime. Though each regime is autonomous, they are simultaneously closely interlaced. In science and technology, autonomy is not antithetical to interdependence and reciprocity. This study demonstrates for the four specified regimes of production and diffusion that differentiation is not contrary to interaction. In science, differentiation and interaction comprise two sides of the same coin. All regimes exhibit a measure of transversality. |
id |
USP-16_d41568f1c34207eb215ec538184fb79d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/48845 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-16 |
network_name_str |
Scientiae Studia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledgeRegimes of science and technology production and diffusionDisciplinary regimeUtilitarian regimeTransitory regimeResearch-technology regimeTransversalityPragmatic universalityThis article is a contribution to the critical sociology of science perspective introduced and developed by Pierre Bourdieu. The paper proposes a transversalist theory of science and technology production and diffusion. It is here argued that science and technology are comprised of multiple regimes where each regime is historically grounded, possesses its own division of labour, modes of cognitive and artifact production and has specific audiences. The major regimes include the disciplinary regime, utilitarian regime, transitory regime and research-technology regime. Though each regime is autonomous, they are simultaneously closely interlaced. In science and technology, autonomy is not antithetical to interdependence and reciprocity. This study demonstrates for the four specified regimes of production and diffusion that differentiation is not contrary to interaction. In science, differentiation and interaction comprise two sides of the same coin. All regimes exhibit a measure of transversality.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/4884510.1590/S1678-31662012000500003Scientiae Studia; v. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-642316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845/52920Marcovich, AnneShinn, Terryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-08T11:28:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/48845Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2014-09-08T11:28:28Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
title |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
spellingShingle |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge Marcovich, Anne Regimes of science and technology production and diffusion Disciplinary regime Utilitarian regime Transitory regime Research-technology regime Transversality Pragmatic universality |
title_short |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
title_full |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
title_sort |
Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge |
author |
Marcovich, Anne |
author_facet |
Marcovich, Anne Shinn, Terry |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shinn, Terry |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marcovich, Anne Shinn, Terry |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Regimes of science and technology production and diffusion Disciplinary regime Utilitarian regime Transitory regime Research-technology regime Transversality Pragmatic universality |
topic |
Regimes of science and technology production and diffusion Disciplinary regime Utilitarian regime Transitory regime Research-technology regime Transversality Pragmatic universality |
description |
This article is a contribution to the critical sociology of science perspective introduced and developed by Pierre Bourdieu. The paper proposes a transversalist theory of science and technology production and diffusion. It is here argued that science and technology are comprised of multiple regimes where each regime is historically grounded, possesses its own division of labour, modes of cognitive and artifact production and has specific audiences. The major regimes include the disciplinary regime, utilitarian regime, transitory regime and research-technology regime. Though each regime is autonomous, they are simultaneously closely interlaced. In science and technology, autonomy is not antithetical to interdependence and reciprocity. This study demonstrates for the four specified regimes of production and diffusion that differentiation is not contrary to interaction. In science, differentiation and interaction comprise two sides of the same coin. All regimes exhibit a measure of transversality. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845 10.1590/S1678-31662012000500003 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-31662012000500003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845/52920 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientiae Studia; v. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64 Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64 Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64 2316-8994 1678-3166 reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientiae Studia (Online) |
collection |
Scientiae Studia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ariconda@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222736647192576 |