Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcovich, Anne
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Shinn, Terry
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientiae Studia (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845
Resumo: This article is a contribution to the critical sociology of science perspective introduced and developed by Pierre Bourdieu. The paper proposes a transversalist theory of science and technology production and diffusion. It is here argued that science and technology are comprised of multiple regimes where each regime is historically grounded, possesses its own division of labour, modes of cognitive and artifact production and has specific audiences. The major regimes include the disciplinary regime, utilitarian regime, transitory regime and research-technology regime. Though each regime is autonomous, they are simultaneously closely interlaced. In science and technology, autonomy is not antithetical to interdependence and reciprocity. This study demonstrates for the four specified regimes of production and diffusion that differentiation is not contrary to interaction. In science, differentiation and interaction comprise two sides of the same coin. All regimes exhibit a measure of transversality.
id USP-16_d41568f1c34207eb215ec538184fb79d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/48845
network_acronym_str USP-16
network_name_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledgeRegimes of science and technology production and diffusionDisciplinary regimeUtilitarian regimeTransitory regimeResearch-technology regimeTransversalityPragmatic universalityThis article is a contribution to the critical sociology of science perspective introduced and developed by Pierre Bourdieu. The paper proposes a transversalist theory of science and technology production and diffusion. It is here argued that science and technology are comprised of multiple regimes where each regime is historically grounded, possesses its own division of labour, modes of cognitive and artifact production and has specific audiences. The major regimes include the disciplinary regime, utilitarian regime, transitory regime and research-technology regime. Though each regime is autonomous, they are simultaneously closely interlaced. In science and technology, autonomy is not antithetical to interdependence and reciprocity. This study demonstrates for the four specified regimes of production and diffusion that differentiation is not contrary to interaction. In science, differentiation and interaction comprise two sides of the same coin. All regimes exhibit a measure of transversality.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/4884510.1590/S1678-31662012000500003Scientiae Studia; v. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-642316-89941678-3166reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845/52920Marcovich, AnneShinn, Terryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-09-08T11:28:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/48845Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1678-3166&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/oaiariconda@usp.br2316-89941678-3166opendoar:2014-09-08T11:28:28Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
title Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
spellingShingle Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
Marcovich, Anne
Regimes of science and technology production and diffusion
Disciplinary regime
Utilitarian regime
Transitory regime
Research-technology regime
Transversality
Pragmatic universality
title_short Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
title_full Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
title_fullStr Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
title_sort Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge
author Marcovich, Anne
author_facet Marcovich, Anne
Shinn, Terry
author_role author
author2 Shinn, Terry
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcovich, Anne
Shinn, Terry
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Regimes of science and technology production and diffusion
Disciplinary regime
Utilitarian regime
Transitory regime
Research-technology regime
Transversality
Pragmatic universality
topic Regimes of science and technology production and diffusion
Disciplinary regime
Utilitarian regime
Transitory regime
Research-technology regime
Transversality
Pragmatic universality
description This article is a contribution to the critical sociology of science perspective introduced and developed by Pierre Bourdieu. The paper proposes a transversalist theory of science and technology production and diffusion. It is here argued that science and technology are comprised of multiple regimes where each regime is historically grounded, possesses its own division of labour, modes of cognitive and artifact production and has specific audiences. The major regimes include the disciplinary regime, utilitarian regime, transitory regime and research-technology regime. Though each regime is autonomous, they are simultaneously closely interlaced. In science and technology, autonomy is not antithetical to interdependence and reciprocity. This study demonstrates for the four specified regimes of production and diffusion that differentiation is not contrary to interaction. In science, differentiation and interaction comprise two sides of the same coin. All regimes exhibit a measure of transversality.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845
10.1590/S1678-31662012000500003
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-31662012000500003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ss/article/view/48845/52920
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia; v. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64
Scientiae Studia; Vol. 10 (2012): Número Especial; 33-64
2316-8994
1678-3166
reponame:Scientiae Studia (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientiae Studia (Online)
collection Scientiae Studia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientiae Studia (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ariconda@usp.br
_version_ 1800222736647192576