Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
Texto Completo: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-18092023-131657/ |
Resumo: | Diagnoses became frequent that there is a crisis of constitutional democracy, understood in this essay as a political regime whose elements are the existence of a stable and known legal- constitutional order, separation of Powers, free, periodic, and competitive elections, and in which the exercise of fundamental rights of political participation and opposition is secured. Such a crisis would be noticeable by the arrival to power of agents with autocratic bias in different national political contexts, among which many include Brazil. And, in the Brazilian context, in the face of what would be a scenario of democracy crisis, positions appear in defense of a democratic judicial activism, with the energetic action by the Federal Supreme Court serving as an antithesis to processes of corrosion of the Brazilian democracy. Considering such scenario, the essay proposes to investigate the crisis of democracy, diagnosing the current prevalence of processes of democratic erosion vis-à-vis autocratic collapses. Sequentially, after conceptualizing democratic erosion and autocratic legalism, it is proposed to characterize judicial activism not as a counterpoint to the crisis of democracy, but as an incremental factor to it, which strikes the rule of law and the separation of Powers, two of its nuclear elements. |
id |
USP_f50539368c7785a2f385474b5d400944 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-18092023-131657 |
network_acronym_str |
USP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository_id_str |
2721 |
spelling |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicialConstituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial.Ativismo judicialAtivismo judicialConstitucionalismo abusivoConstitucionalismo abusivoDemocraciaDemocraciaErosão democráticaErosão democráticaJurisdição constitucionalJurisdição constitucionalDiagnoses became frequent that there is a crisis of constitutional democracy, understood in this essay as a political regime whose elements are the existence of a stable and known legal- constitutional order, separation of Powers, free, periodic, and competitive elections, and in which the exercise of fundamental rights of political participation and opposition is secured. Such a crisis would be noticeable by the arrival to power of agents with autocratic bias in different national political contexts, among which many include Brazil. And, in the Brazilian context, in the face of what would be a scenario of democracy crisis, positions appear in defense of a democratic judicial activism, with the energetic action by the Federal Supreme Court serving as an antithesis to processes of corrosion of the Brazilian democracy. Considering such scenario, the essay proposes to investigate the crisis of democracy, diagnosing the current prevalence of processes of democratic erosion vis-à-vis autocratic collapses. Sequentially, after conceptualizing democratic erosion and autocratic legalism, it is proposed to characterize judicial activism not as a counterpoint to the crisis of democracy, but as an incremental factor to it, which strikes the rule of law and the separation of Powers, two of its nuclear elements.Diagnoses became frequent that there is a crisis of constitutional democracy, understood in this essay as a political regime whose elements are the existence of a stable and known legal- constitutional order, separation of Powers, free, periodic, and competitive elections, and in which the exercise of fundamental rights of political participation and opposition is secured. Such a crisis would be noticeable by the arrival to power of agents with autocratic bias in different national political contexts, among which many include Brazil. And, in the Brazilian context, in the face of what would be a scenario of democracy crisis, positions appear in defense of a democratic judicial activism, with the energetic action by the Federal Supreme Court serving as an antithesis to processes of corrosion of the Brazilian democracy. Considering such scenario, the essay proposes to investigate the crisis of democracy, diagnosing the current prevalence of processes of democratic erosion vis-à-vis autocratic collapses. Sequentially, after conceptualizing democratic erosion and autocratic legalism, it is proposed to characterize judicial activism not as a counterpoint to the crisis of democracy, but as an incremental factor to it, which strikes the rule of law and the separation of Powers, two of its nuclear elements.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPRamos, Elival da SilvaAlves, Vitor Amorim Mendonça2023-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-18092023-131657/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesspor2024-06-13T18:21:03Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-18092023-131657Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-06-13T18:21:03Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial. |
title |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial |
spellingShingle |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial Alves, Vitor Amorim Mendonça Ativismo judicial Ativismo judicial Constitucionalismo abusivo Constitucionalismo abusivo Democracia Democracia Erosão democrática Erosão democrática Jurisdição constitucional Jurisdição constitucional |
title_short |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial |
title_full |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial |
title_fullStr |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial |
title_sort |
Constituição, crise democrática e ativismo judicial |
author |
Alves, Vitor Amorim Mendonça |
author_facet |
Alves, Vitor Amorim Mendonça |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Elival da Silva |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Vitor Amorim Mendonça |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ativismo judicial Ativismo judicial Constitucionalismo abusivo Constitucionalismo abusivo Democracia Democracia Erosão democrática Erosão democrática Jurisdição constitucional Jurisdição constitucional |
topic |
Ativismo judicial Ativismo judicial Constitucionalismo abusivo Constitucionalismo abusivo Democracia Democracia Erosão democrática Erosão democrática Jurisdição constitucional Jurisdição constitucional |
description |
Diagnoses became frequent that there is a crisis of constitutional democracy, understood in this essay as a political regime whose elements are the existence of a stable and known legal- constitutional order, separation of Powers, free, periodic, and competitive elections, and in which the exercise of fundamental rights of political participation and opposition is secured. Such a crisis would be noticeable by the arrival to power of agents with autocratic bias in different national political contexts, among which many include Brazil. And, in the Brazilian context, in the face of what would be a scenario of democracy crisis, positions appear in defense of a democratic judicial activism, with the energetic action by the Federal Supreme Court serving as an antithesis to processes of corrosion of the Brazilian democracy. Considering such scenario, the essay proposes to investigate the crisis of democracy, diagnosing the current prevalence of processes of democratic erosion vis-à-vis autocratic collapses. Sequentially, after conceptualizing democratic erosion and autocratic legalism, it is proposed to characterize judicial activism not as a counterpoint to the crisis of democracy, but as an incremental factor to it, which strikes the rule of law and the separation of Powers, two of its nuclear elements. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-23 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-18092023-131657/ |
url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-18092023-131657/ |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
_version_ |
1815257113157435392 |