Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
Texto Completo: | http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1452 |
Resumo: | This research approaches the perception of a group of teachers of Elementary School of city of São José dos Pinhais (Paraná), about the innovations proposed in the PNAIC (Pacto Nacional de Alfabetização na Idade Certa – National Agreement of Literacy in Certain Age). It is a qualitative, exploratory and analytic research, whose principal objective consists in identify the implemented innovations on the pedagogical practices in this group of literacy professors, which participated of the Formation Program PNAIC between the years of 2013 and 2016. By the literature review, this Program relies in a group of principles, as well as 4 acting axis: continuous formation of the literacy teachers that act in the 1ft, 2sd and 3td years of Elementary School; didactic materials; systematic evaluations; and management, social control and mobilization. The principles are: the alphabetical write‟s system is complex and demands a systematic and challenging teaching; the reading and writing capacity‟s development occurs during the entire education process, but must start soon in the beginning of Basic Education; knowledge provided from different areas could and must be appropriated for children, so that they can hear, talk, read, white about different topics and act in society; the playfulness and children‟s beware are basic conditions in the teaching and learning‟s process (BRASIL, 2012a, p.27). The literacy professor is considered essential to the PNAIC‟s success, once its practical is the way to realize the Program‟s objectives. In this dissertation, the text contemplates three chapters. The first explores questions related to innovation and educational challenges‟ concepts, and how they occur in the pedagogical practices. For this, we bring to the dialog authors like Fullan (2009), Correia (2000), Hernandez (2012), Carbonell (2002), Cardoso (1992), Messina (2001) and Walter Garcia (1995). The second chapter approaches the PNAIC‟S proposal and principles and the teacher‟s role in the same proposal. We describe, also, each of the formation phases, as well as the materials and content that were used by the professors during the proposal. Besides, we bring the teachers‟ views about the program‟s proposal and implementation. To this chapter were used documents from MEC (1998) (2012) (2014) (2015) and (2016), and authors like Cichocki (2016), Foragi (2013), Joe Garcia (2016), Martimiano (2013) and Souza (2007). Another chapter presents the methodological procedures of the research. We describe the data collection, during which were obtained the research‟s data, by means of questionnaires and semistructured interviews, next to literacy teachers who participate of the continuous formation in the city of São José dos Pinhais. The interviews content‟s analyze was based on the Bardin‟s method (2016). This possibilities the creating of the following categories of interpretative‟s analyze: modify the teacher’s thought, teaching strategies and ways of thinking. In the last section of the text, we introduce some considers about the realized investigation and point possible research‟s contributions regarding to training teachers. |
id |
UTP_cc7f92a7358197f790c258a36cd671ec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:tede/1452 |
network_acronym_str |
UTP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
spelling |
Garcia, JoeHaracemiv, Sonia Maria ChavesSilva, Maria Cristina Borges dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7001399509231946Cichocki, Manoela Soares2018-07-03T13:15:44Z2018-04-23Cichocki, Manoela Soares. Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC. 2018.146 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2018.http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1452This research approaches the perception of a group of teachers of Elementary School of city of São José dos Pinhais (Paraná), about the innovations proposed in the PNAIC (Pacto Nacional de Alfabetização na Idade Certa – National Agreement of Literacy in Certain Age). It is a qualitative, exploratory and analytic research, whose principal objective consists in identify the implemented innovations on the pedagogical practices in this group of literacy professors, which participated of the Formation Program PNAIC between the years of 2013 and 2016. By the literature review, this Program relies in a group of principles, as well as 4 acting axis: continuous formation of the literacy teachers that act in the 1ft, 2sd and 3td years of Elementary School; didactic materials; systematic evaluations; and management, social control and mobilization. The principles are: the alphabetical write‟s system is complex and demands a systematic and challenging teaching; the reading and writing capacity‟s development occurs during the entire education process, but must start soon in the beginning of Basic Education; knowledge provided from different areas could and must be appropriated for children, so that they can hear, talk, read, white about different topics and act in society; the playfulness and children‟s beware are basic conditions in the teaching and learning‟s process (BRASIL, 2012a, p.27). The literacy professor is considered essential to the PNAIC‟s success, once its practical is the way to realize the Program‟s objectives. In this dissertation, the text contemplates three chapters. The first explores questions related to innovation and educational challenges‟ concepts, and how they occur in the pedagogical practices. For this, we bring to the dialog authors like Fullan (2009), Correia (2000), Hernandez (2012), Carbonell (2002), Cardoso (1992), Messina (2001) and Walter Garcia (1995). The second chapter approaches the PNAIC‟S proposal and principles and the teacher‟s role in the same proposal. We describe, also, each of the formation phases, as well as the materials and content that were used by the professors during the proposal. Besides, we bring the teachers‟ views about the program‟s proposal and implementation. To this chapter were used documents from MEC (1998) (2012) (2014) (2015) and (2016), and authors like Cichocki (2016), Foragi (2013), Joe Garcia (2016), Martimiano (2013) and Souza (2007). Another chapter presents the methodological procedures of the research. We describe the data collection, during which were obtained the research‟s data, by means of questionnaires and semistructured interviews, next to literacy teachers who participate of the continuous formation in the city of São José dos Pinhais. The interviews content‟s analyze was based on the Bardin‟s method (2016). This possibilities the creating of the following categories of interpretative‟s analyze: modify the teacher’s thought, teaching strategies and ways of thinking. In the last section of the text, we introduce some considers about the realized investigation and point possible research‟s contributions regarding to training teachers.Esta pesquisa aborda a percepção de um grupo de professores de Ensino Fundamental, do Município de São José dos Pinhais (Paraná), a respeito das inovações propostas no Pacto Nacional de Alfabetização na Idade Certa (PNAIC). Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa, exploratória e analítica, cujo objetivo geral consiste em identificar as inovações implementadas nas práticas pedagógicas daquele grupo de professores alfabetizadores que participaram do Programa de Formação do PNAIC entre os anos de 2013 e 2016. Conforme revisão de literatura, esse Programa apoia-se em um conjunto de princípios, bem como em 4 eixos de atuação: formação continuada dos professores alfabetizadores que atuam em turmas de 1º, 2º e 3º anos do Ensino Fundamental; materiais didáticos; avaliações sistemáticas; e gestão, controle social e mobilização. Os princípios são: o sistema de escrita alfabética é complexo e exige um ensino sistemático e problematizador; o desenvolvimento das capacidades de leitura e de produção de textos ocorre durante todo o processo de escolarização, mas deve ser iniciado logo no início da Educação Básica; conhecimentos oriundos das diferentes áreas podem e devem ser apropriados pelas crianças, de modo que elas possam ouvir, falar, ler, escrever sobre temas diversos e agir na sociedade; a ludicidade e o cuidado com as crianças são condições básicas nos processos de ensino e de aprendizagem (BRASIL, 2012a, p. 27). O professor alfabetizador é considerado peça chave para o sucesso do PNAIC, sendo a sua prática o meio para realizar os objetivos do Programa. O texto desta dissertação contempla três capítulos. O primeiro explora questões relacionadas aos conceitos de inovação e mudança educacional, e como elas ocorrem nas práticas pedagógicas. Para isso, trazemos para o diálogo autores como Fullan (2009), Correia (2000), Hernandez (2012), Carbonell (2002), Cardoso (1992), Messina (2001) e Walter Garcia (1995). O segundo capítulo aborda a proposta e os princípios do PNAIC e o papel do professor alfabetizador nessa proposta. Também descrevemos cada uma das fases da formação , bem como os conteúdos e os materiais que foram utilizados com os professores que dela participaram. Também tratamos da visão dos professores sobre a proposta e implantação do programa. Para esse capítulo foram utilizados documentos do MEC (1998) (2012) (2014) (2015) e (2016), e autores como Cichocki (2016), Foragi (2013), Joe Garcia (2016), Martimiano (2013) e Souza (2007). Um outro capítulo apresenta os procedimentos metodológicos da pesquisa. Ali descrevemos o levantamento de campo, durante o qual foram obtidos os dados da pesquisa, por meio de questionários e entrevistas semiestruturadas, junto a professores alfabetizadores que participam da formação continuada no município de São José dos Pinhais. A análise do conteúdo das entrevistas foi baseada no método de Bardin (2016). Isso possibilitou criar as seguintes categorias de análise interpretativa: modificar o pensamento docente, estratégias de ensino e formas de pensar. Na última seção do texto apresentamos algumas considerações sobre a investigação realizada e apontamos possíveis contribuições da pesquisa no que se refere à formação de professores.Submitted by Divanete Paiva (divanete.paiva@utp.br) on 2018-07-03T13:15:44Z No. of bitstreams: 1 INOVACOES EDUCACIONAIS.pdf: 1549021 bytes, checksum: 895f28056314e2a8f121e7a86d7e26d5 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-03T13:15:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 INOVACOES EDUCACIONAIS.pdf: 1549021 bytes, checksum: 895f28056314e2a8f121e7a86d7e26d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-04-23application/pdfporUniversidade Tuiuti do ParanaMestrado em EducaçãoUTPBrasilEducaçãoEducaçãoEnsino fundamentalInovaçãoPráticas pedagógicasPNAICEducationElementary school.InnovationPedagogical practicesCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOInovações educacionais presentes no PNAICinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis26175645301933333655005006006022136314876952138-240345818910352367info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTPinstname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paranáinstacron:UTPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1452/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51ORIGINALINOVACOES EDUCACIONAIS.pdfINOVACOES EDUCACIONAIS.pdfapplication/pdf1549021http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1452/2/INOVACOES+EDUCACIONAIS.pdf895f28056314e2a8f121e7a86d7e26d5MD52tede/1452oai:localhost:tede/14522018-07-03 10:15:44.227TEDEtede@utp.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 |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
title |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
spellingShingle |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC Cichocki, Manoela Soares Educação Ensino fundamental Inovação Práticas pedagógicas PNAIC Education Elementary school. Innovation Pedagogical practices CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
title_short |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
title_full |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
title_fullStr |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
title_sort |
Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC |
author |
Cichocki, Manoela Soares |
author_facet |
Cichocki, Manoela Soares |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Joe |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Haracemiv, Sonia Maria Chaves |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Maria Cristina Borges da |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7001399509231946 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cichocki, Manoela Soares |
contributor_str_mv |
Garcia, Joe Haracemiv, Sonia Maria Chaves Silva, Maria Cristina Borges da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educação Ensino fundamental Inovação Práticas pedagógicas PNAIC |
topic |
Educação Ensino fundamental Inovação Práticas pedagógicas PNAIC Education Elementary school. Innovation Pedagogical practices CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Education Elementary school. Innovation Pedagogical practices |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv |
This research approaches the perception of a group of teachers of Elementary School of city of São José dos Pinhais (Paraná), about the innovations proposed in the PNAIC (Pacto Nacional de Alfabetização na Idade Certa – National Agreement of Literacy in Certain Age). It is a qualitative, exploratory and analytic research, whose principal objective consists in identify the implemented innovations on the pedagogical practices in this group of literacy professors, which participated of the Formation Program PNAIC between the years of 2013 and 2016. By the literature review, this Program relies in a group of principles, as well as 4 acting axis: continuous formation of the literacy teachers that act in the 1ft, 2sd and 3td years of Elementary School; didactic materials; systematic evaluations; and management, social control and mobilization. The principles are: the alphabetical write‟s system is complex and demands a systematic and challenging teaching; the reading and writing capacity‟s development occurs during the entire education process, but must start soon in the beginning of Basic Education; knowledge provided from different areas could and must be appropriated for children, so that they can hear, talk, read, white about different topics and act in society; the playfulness and children‟s beware are basic conditions in the teaching and learning‟s process (BRASIL, 2012a, p.27). The literacy professor is considered essential to the PNAIC‟s success, once its practical is the way to realize the Program‟s objectives. In this dissertation, the text contemplates three chapters. The first explores questions related to innovation and educational challenges‟ concepts, and how they occur in the pedagogical practices. For this, we bring to the dialog authors like Fullan (2009), Correia (2000), Hernandez (2012), Carbonell (2002), Cardoso (1992), Messina (2001) and Walter Garcia (1995). The second chapter approaches the PNAIC‟S proposal and principles and the teacher‟s role in the same proposal. We describe, also, each of the formation phases, as well as the materials and content that were used by the professors during the proposal. Besides, we bring the teachers‟ views about the program‟s proposal and implementation. To this chapter were used documents from MEC (1998) (2012) (2014) (2015) and (2016), and authors like Cichocki (2016), Foragi (2013), Joe Garcia (2016), Martimiano (2013) and Souza (2007). Another chapter presents the methodological procedures of the research. We describe the data collection, during which were obtained the research‟s data, by means of questionnaires and semistructured interviews, next to literacy teachers who participate of the continuous formation in the city of São José dos Pinhais. The interviews content‟s analyze was based on the Bardin‟s method (2016). This possibilities the creating of the following categories of interpretative‟s analyze: modify the teacher’s thought, teaching strategies and ways of thinking. In the last section of the text, we introduce some considers about the realized investigation and point possible research‟s contributions regarding to training teachers. |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
Esta pesquisa aborda a percepção de um grupo de professores de Ensino Fundamental, do Município de São José dos Pinhais (Paraná), a respeito das inovações propostas no Pacto Nacional de Alfabetização na Idade Certa (PNAIC). Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa, exploratória e analítica, cujo objetivo geral consiste em identificar as inovações implementadas nas práticas pedagógicas daquele grupo de professores alfabetizadores que participaram do Programa de Formação do PNAIC entre os anos de 2013 e 2016. Conforme revisão de literatura, esse Programa apoia-se em um conjunto de princípios, bem como em 4 eixos de atuação: formação continuada dos professores alfabetizadores que atuam em turmas de 1º, 2º e 3º anos do Ensino Fundamental; materiais didáticos; avaliações sistemáticas; e gestão, controle social e mobilização. Os princípios são: o sistema de escrita alfabética é complexo e exige um ensino sistemático e problematizador; o desenvolvimento das capacidades de leitura e de produção de textos ocorre durante todo o processo de escolarização, mas deve ser iniciado logo no início da Educação Básica; conhecimentos oriundos das diferentes áreas podem e devem ser apropriados pelas crianças, de modo que elas possam ouvir, falar, ler, escrever sobre temas diversos e agir na sociedade; a ludicidade e o cuidado com as crianças são condições básicas nos processos de ensino e de aprendizagem (BRASIL, 2012a, p. 27). O professor alfabetizador é considerado peça chave para o sucesso do PNAIC, sendo a sua prática o meio para realizar os objetivos do Programa. O texto desta dissertação contempla três capítulos. O primeiro explora questões relacionadas aos conceitos de inovação e mudança educacional, e como elas ocorrem nas práticas pedagógicas. Para isso, trazemos para o diálogo autores como Fullan (2009), Correia (2000), Hernandez (2012), Carbonell (2002), Cardoso (1992), Messina (2001) e Walter Garcia (1995). O segundo capítulo aborda a proposta e os princípios do PNAIC e o papel do professor alfabetizador nessa proposta. Também descrevemos cada uma das fases da formação , bem como os conteúdos e os materiais que foram utilizados com os professores que dela participaram. Também tratamos da visão dos professores sobre a proposta e implantação do programa. Para esse capítulo foram utilizados documentos do MEC (1998) (2012) (2014) (2015) e (2016), e autores como Cichocki (2016), Foragi (2013), Joe Garcia (2016), Martimiano (2013) e Souza (2007). Um outro capítulo apresenta os procedimentos metodológicos da pesquisa. Ali descrevemos o levantamento de campo, durante o qual foram obtidos os dados da pesquisa, por meio de questionários e entrevistas semiestruturadas, junto a professores alfabetizadores que participam da formação continuada no município de São José dos Pinhais. A análise do conteúdo das entrevistas foi baseada no método de Bardin (2016). Isso possibilitou criar as seguintes categorias de análise interpretativa: modificar o pensamento docente, estratégias de ensino e formas de pensar. Na última seção do texto apresentamos algumas considerações sobre a investigação realizada e apontamos possíveis contribuições da pesquisa no que se refere à formação de professores. |
description |
This research approaches the perception of a group of teachers of Elementary School of city of São José dos Pinhais (Paraná), about the innovations proposed in the PNAIC (Pacto Nacional de Alfabetização na Idade Certa – National Agreement of Literacy in Certain Age). It is a qualitative, exploratory and analytic research, whose principal objective consists in identify the implemented innovations on the pedagogical practices in this group of literacy professors, which participated of the Formation Program PNAIC between the years of 2013 and 2016. By the literature review, this Program relies in a group of principles, as well as 4 acting axis: continuous formation of the literacy teachers that act in the 1ft, 2sd and 3td years of Elementary School; didactic materials; systematic evaluations; and management, social control and mobilization. The principles are: the alphabetical write‟s system is complex and demands a systematic and challenging teaching; the reading and writing capacity‟s development occurs during the entire education process, but must start soon in the beginning of Basic Education; knowledge provided from different areas could and must be appropriated for children, so that they can hear, talk, read, white about different topics and act in society; the playfulness and children‟s beware are basic conditions in the teaching and learning‟s process (BRASIL, 2012a, p.27). The literacy professor is considered essential to the PNAIC‟s success, once its practical is the way to realize the Program‟s objectives. In this dissertation, the text contemplates three chapters. The first explores questions related to innovation and educational challenges‟ concepts, and how they occur in the pedagogical practices. For this, we bring to the dialog authors like Fullan (2009), Correia (2000), Hernandez (2012), Carbonell (2002), Cardoso (1992), Messina (2001) and Walter Garcia (1995). The second chapter approaches the PNAIC‟S proposal and principles and the teacher‟s role in the same proposal. We describe, also, each of the formation phases, as well as the materials and content that were used by the professors during the proposal. Besides, we bring the teachers‟ views about the program‟s proposal and implementation. To this chapter were used documents from MEC (1998) (2012) (2014) (2015) and (2016), and authors like Cichocki (2016), Foragi (2013), Joe Garcia (2016), Martimiano (2013) and Souza (2007). Another chapter presents the methodological procedures of the research. We describe the data collection, during which were obtained the research‟s data, by means of questionnaires and semistructured interviews, next to literacy teachers who participate of the continuous formation in the city of São José dos Pinhais. The interviews content‟s analyze was based on the Bardin‟s method (2016). This possibilities the creating of the following categories of interpretative‟s analyze: modify the teacher’s thought, teaching strategies and ways of thinking. In the last section of the text, we introduce some considers about the realized investigation and point possible research‟s contributions regarding to training teachers. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-03T13:15:44Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-23 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Cichocki, Manoela Soares. Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC. 2018.146 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1452 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cichocki, Manoela Soares. Inovações educacionais presentes no PNAIC. 2018.146 f. Dissertação( Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, 2018. |
url |
http://tede.utp.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1452 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
2617564530193333365 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
6022136314876952138 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-240345818910352367 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tuiuti do Parana |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado em Educação |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UTP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Educação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Tuiuti do Parana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP instname:Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná instacron:UTP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UTP |
instname_str |
Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná |
instacron_str |
UTP |
institution |
UTP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1452/1/license.txt http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/1452/2/INOVACOES+EDUCACIONAIS.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 895f28056314e2a8f121e7a86d7e26d5 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
TEDE |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tede@utp.br |
_version_ |
1623392710239977472 |