How can school be fairer and more effective?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos Cenpec (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/202 |
Resumo: | Relying on a wide survey of researches and studies by major thinkers from the education domain, Marcel Crahay writes here about the relationship between ethical choices and educational mechanisms and practices which frame the teaching and apprenticeship process. The author deals with the kinds of mechanisms and practices which have achieved best results from the point of view of a fairer knowledge allocation. He analyzes the relationship between these practices an ethical principles of justice as well. He concludes that acquired knowledge equity, which is based on corrective justice principle, is the most appropriate pedagogical ideology for basic school because it considers various requisites researches have suggested to be necessary for apprenticeship for all, such as respecting distinct apprenticeship paces and the need for continued adjustment and changes in the teaching process, based on formative evaluation. Moreover, this pedagogical ideology takes into account scientific evidence of the non-existence of natural gifts, opposing to educational mechanisms and practices that provide unequal teaching opportunities because of the meritocracy principle. |
id |
CENPEC-1_6f56883f5a760c62df0599ba54dd1e05 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.cadernos.cenpec.org.br:article/202 |
network_acronym_str |
CENPEC-1 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos Cenpec (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How can school be fairer and more effective?Como a escola pode ser mais justa e mais eficaz?Education. Equity.Educational practices. Inequality at school. Equity. Teaching. Basic education.Educação. Desigualdade. Equidade.Práticas educativas. Desigualdade escolar. Equidade. Ensino. Educação básica.Relying on a wide survey of researches and studies by major thinkers from the education domain, Marcel Crahay writes here about the relationship between ethical choices and educational mechanisms and practices which frame the teaching and apprenticeship process. The author deals with the kinds of mechanisms and practices which have achieved best results from the point of view of a fairer knowledge allocation. He analyzes the relationship between these practices an ethical principles of justice as well. He concludes that acquired knowledge equity, which is based on corrective justice principle, is the most appropriate pedagogical ideology for basic school because it considers various requisites researches have suggested to be necessary for apprenticeship for all, such as respecting distinct apprenticeship paces and the need for continued adjustment and changes in the teaching process, based on formative evaluation. Moreover, this pedagogical ideology takes into account scientific evidence of the non-existence of natural gifts, opposing to educational mechanisms and practices that provide unequal teaching opportunities because of the meritocracy principle.Recorrendo a um amplo levantamento de pesquisas e estudos de grandes pensadores do campo da educação, Marcel Crahay discorre neste artigo sobre a relação entre opções éticas e os dispositivos e práticas educacionais que estruturam o processo de ensino e aprendizagem. O autor trata dos tipos de dispositivos e práticas educacionais que têm gerado melhores resultados em termos de uma distribuição mais justa do conhecimento. Analisa ainda a relação entre tais práticas e princípios éticos e de justiça. Conclui que a igualdade de conhecimentos adquiridos, cuja base é o princípio de justiça corretiva, é a ideologia pedagógica mais adequada à educação básica porque contempla vários requisitos que as pesquisas indicam necessárias à aprendizagem de todos tais como o respeito aos distintos ritmos de aprendizagem e a necessidade de adequação e mudanças contínuas do processo de ensino, com base em avaliação formativa. Além disso, essa ideologia pedagógica considera as provas científicas de inexistência de dons naturais, colocando-se contrária aos dispositivos e práticas educacionais que oferecem oportunidades de ensino desiguais devido ao princípio meritocrático.Cenpec - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Educação, Cultura e Ação ComunitáriaCrahay, Marcel2013-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/20210.18676/cadernoscenpec.v3i1.202Cadernos Cenpec | Nova série; v. 3, n. 1 (2013): Justiça como EquidadeCadernos Cenpec; v. 3, n. 1 (2013): Justiça como Equidade2237-99832237-998310.18676/cadernoscenpec.v3i1reponame:Cadernos Cenpec (Online)instname:Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária (CENPEC)instacron:CENPECporhttps://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/202/231info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-06-28T16:05:37Zoai:ojs.www.cadernos.cenpec.org.br:article/202Revistahttps://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/PUBhttps://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/oaiceliaparra@cenpec.org.br||celiaparra@cenpec.org.br2237-99832237-9983opendoar:2016-06-28T16:05:37Cadernos Cenpec (Online) - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária (CENPEC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How can school be fairer and more effective? Como a escola pode ser mais justa e mais eficaz? |
title |
How can school be fairer and more effective? |
spellingShingle |
How can school be fairer and more effective? Crahay, Marcel Education. Equity. Educational practices. Inequality at school. Equity. Teaching. Basic education. Educação. Desigualdade. Equidade. Práticas educativas. Desigualdade escolar. Equidade. Ensino. Educação básica. |
title_short |
How can school be fairer and more effective? |
title_full |
How can school be fairer and more effective? |
title_fullStr |
How can school be fairer and more effective? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How can school be fairer and more effective? |
title_sort |
How can school be fairer and more effective? |
author |
Crahay, Marcel |
author_facet |
Crahay, Marcel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Crahay, Marcel |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Education. Equity. Educational practices. Inequality at school. Equity. Teaching. Basic education. Educação. Desigualdade. Equidade. Práticas educativas. Desigualdade escolar. Equidade. Ensino. Educação básica. |
topic |
Education. Equity. Educational practices. Inequality at school. Equity. Teaching. Basic education. Educação. Desigualdade. Equidade. Práticas educativas. Desigualdade escolar. Equidade. Ensino. Educação básica. |
description |
Relying on a wide survey of researches and studies by major thinkers from the education domain, Marcel Crahay writes here about the relationship between ethical choices and educational mechanisms and practices which frame the teaching and apprenticeship process. The author deals with the kinds of mechanisms and practices which have achieved best results from the point of view of a fairer knowledge allocation. He analyzes the relationship between these practices an ethical principles of justice as well. He concludes that acquired knowledge equity, which is based on corrective justice principle, is the most appropriate pedagogical ideology for basic school because it considers various requisites researches have suggested to be necessary for apprenticeship for all, such as respecting distinct apprenticeship paces and the need for continued adjustment and changes in the teaching process, based on formative evaluation. Moreover, this pedagogical ideology takes into account scientific evidence of the non-existence of natural gifts, opposing to educational mechanisms and practices that provide unequal teaching opportunities because of the meritocracy principle. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-18 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/202 10.18676/cadernoscenpec.v3i1.202 |
url |
https://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/202 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18676/cadernoscenpec.v3i1.202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://cadernos.cenpec.org.br/cadernos/index.php/cadernos/article/view/202/231 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cenpec - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cenpec - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos Cenpec | Nova série; v. 3, n. 1 (2013): Justiça como Equidade Cadernos Cenpec; v. 3, n. 1 (2013): Justiça como Equidade 2237-9983 2237-9983 10.18676/cadernoscenpec.v3i1 reponame:Cadernos Cenpec (Online) instname:Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária (CENPEC) instacron:CENPEC |
instname_str |
Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária (CENPEC) |
instacron_str |
CENPEC |
institution |
CENPEC |
reponame_str |
Cadernos Cenpec (Online) |
collection |
Cadernos Cenpec (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos Cenpec (Online) - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Educação, Cultura e Ação Comunitária (CENPEC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
celiaparra@cenpec.org.br||celiaparra@cenpec.org.br |
_version_ |
1808042072638226432 |