The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tassinari, Clarissa
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
Texto Completo: http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100
Resumo: The concept of Law produced by the modernity was sitting on what has been theoretically developed by the juridical positivism. With the transformations occurred in society and also on the Law theory the juridical contemporary paradigm is characterized by the trinomial moral-principles-discretion, that is, a) for the predominance of using of principles, b) for the incorporation of morality to the Law, and c) for the recognition of the judges’ discretion power. Because of that, the query for the concept of Law seems to gain a new answer forged from what has been academically denominated of postpositivism. In this context, the goal of this article is to analyze the juridical positivism of Hebert Hart with regards to the question of Law conceived as a system of rules and the criterion of choice in the Law interpretation, establishing at last a parallel between its proposal and the current transformations through which the theory of Law goes through.
id FDF-0_7871557048ac5319dddba1d9191e61ca
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/100
network_acronym_str FDF-0
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
repository_id_str
spelling The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert HartAs Transformações da Teoria do Direito Contemporânea no Contexto do Trinômio Moral-Princípios-Discricionariedade - Uma abordagem no marco de O Conceito de Direito de Herbert HartDiscricionariedadePós-positivismoPositivismo jurídicoHerbert HartThe concept of Law produced by the modernity was sitting on what has been theoretically developed by the juridical positivism. With the transformations occurred in society and also on the Law theory the juridical contemporary paradigm is characterized by the trinomial moral-principles-discretion, that is, a) for the predominance of using of principles, b) for the incorporation of morality to the Law, and c) for the recognition of the judges’ discretion power. Because of that, the query for the concept of Law seems to gain a new answer forged from what has been academically denominated of postpositivism. In this context, the goal of this article is to analyze the juridical positivism of Hebert Hart with regards to the question of Law conceived as a system of rules and the criterion of choice in the Law interpretation, establishing at last a parallel between its proposal and the current transformations through which the theory of Law goes through.O conceito de Direito produzido pela modernidade estava assentado no que havia sido desenvolvido teoricamente pelo positivismo jurídico. Com as transformações ocorridas na sociedade e, também, na teoria do direito, o paradigma jurídico contemporâneo é caracterizado pelo trinômio moral-princípios-discricionariedade, ou seja: a) pelo predomínio da utilização de princípios; b) pela incorporação da moral ao Direito; e c) pelo reconhecimento do poder discricionário dos juízes. Em razão disso, a pergunta pelo conceito de direito parece ganhar uma nova resposta, forjada a partir do que vem sendo academicamente denominado de pós-positivismo. Nesse contexto, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar o positivismo jurídico de Herbert Hart no que diz respeito à questão do Direito concebido como um sistema de regras e do critério de escolha na interpretação do Direito, estabelecendo, ao final, um paralelo entre sua proposta e as atuais transformações pelas quais passa a teoria do Direito.Faculdade de Direito de Franca2010-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/10010.21207/1983.4225.100Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 3 n. 1 (2010)1983-4225reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Francainstname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)instacron:FDFporhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100/62Tassinari, Clarissainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-19T11:30:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/100Revistahttps://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdfPUBhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/oai||drcildo@direitofranca.br1983-42251983-4225opendoar:2020-04-19T11:30:23Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
As Transformações da Teoria do Direito Contemporânea no Contexto do Trinômio Moral-Princípios-Discricionariedade - Uma abordagem no marco de O Conceito de Direito de Herbert Hart
title The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
spellingShingle The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
Tassinari, Clarissa
Discricionariedade
Pós-positivismo
Positivismo jurídico
Herbert Hart
title_short The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
title_full The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
title_fullStr The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
title_full_unstemmed The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
title_sort The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
author Tassinari, Clarissa
author_facet Tassinari, Clarissa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tassinari, Clarissa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discricionariedade
Pós-positivismo
Positivismo jurídico
Herbert Hart
topic Discricionariedade
Pós-positivismo
Positivismo jurídico
Herbert Hart
description The concept of Law produced by the modernity was sitting on what has been theoretically developed by the juridical positivism. With the transformations occurred in society and also on the Law theory the juridical contemporary paradigm is characterized by the trinomial moral-principles-discretion, that is, a) for the predominance of using of principles, b) for the incorporation of morality to the Law, and c) for the recognition of the judges’ discretion power. Because of that, the query for the concept of Law seems to gain a new answer forged from what has been academically denominated of postpositivism. In this context, the goal of this article is to analyze the juridical positivism of Hebert Hart with regards to the question of Law conceived as a system of rules and the criterion of choice in the Law interpretation, establishing at last a parallel between its proposal and the current transformations through which the theory of Law goes through.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100
10.21207/1983.4225.100
url http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100
identifier_str_mv 10.21207/1983.4225.100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100/62
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito de Franca
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito de Franca
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 3 n. 1 (2010)
1983-4225
reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
instname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)
instacron:FDF
instname_str Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)
instacron_str FDF
institution FDF
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
collection Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||drcildo@direitofranca.br
_version_ 1754644628305346560