The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
Texto Completo: | http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100 |
Resumo: | The concept of Law produced by the modernity was sitting on what has been theoretically developed by the juridical positivism. With the transformations occurred in society and also on the Law theory the juridical contemporary paradigm is characterized by the trinomial moral-principles-discretion, that is, a) for the predominance of using of principles, b) for the incorporation of morality to the Law, and c) for the recognition of the judges’ discretion power. Because of that, the query for the concept of Law seems to gain a new answer forged from what has been academically denominated of postpositivism. In this context, the goal of this article is to analyze the juridical positivism of Hebert Hart with regards to the question of Law conceived as a system of rules and the criterion of choice in the Law interpretation, establishing at last a parallel between its proposal and the current transformations through which the theory of Law goes through. |
id |
FDF-0_7871557048ac5319dddba1d9191e61ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/100 |
network_acronym_str |
FDF-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert HartAs Transformações da Teoria do Direito Contemporânea no Contexto do Trinômio Moral-Princípios-Discricionariedade - Uma abordagem no marco de O Conceito de Direito de Herbert HartDiscricionariedadePós-positivismoPositivismo jurídicoHerbert HartThe concept of Law produced by the modernity was sitting on what has been theoretically developed by the juridical positivism. With the transformations occurred in society and also on the Law theory the juridical contemporary paradigm is characterized by the trinomial moral-principles-discretion, that is, a) for the predominance of using of principles, b) for the incorporation of morality to the Law, and c) for the recognition of the judges’ discretion power. Because of that, the query for the concept of Law seems to gain a new answer forged from what has been academically denominated of postpositivism. In this context, the goal of this article is to analyze the juridical positivism of Hebert Hart with regards to the question of Law conceived as a system of rules and the criterion of choice in the Law interpretation, establishing at last a parallel between its proposal and the current transformations through which the theory of Law goes through.O conceito de Direito produzido pela modernidade estava assentado no que havia sido desenvolvido teoricamente pelo positivismo jurídico. Com as transformações ocorridas na sociedade e, também, na teoria do direito, o paradigma jurídico contemporâneo é caracterizado pelo trinômio moral-princípios-discricionariedade, ou seja: a) pelo predomínio da utilização de princípios; b) pela incorporação da moral ao Direito; e c) pelo reconhecimento do poder discricionário dos juízes. Em razão disso, a pergunta pelo conceito de direito parece ganhar uma nova resposta, forjada a partir do que vem sendo academicamente denominado de pós-positivismo. Nesse contexto, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar o positivismo jurídico de Herbert Hart no que diz respeito à questão do Direito concebido como um sistema de regras e do critério de escolha na interpretação do Direito, estabelecendo, ao final, um paralelo entre sua proposta e as atuais transformações pelas quais passa a teoria do Direito.Faculdade de Direito de Franca2010-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionavaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/10010.21207/1983.4225.100Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 3 n. 1 (2010)1983-4225reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Francainstname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)instacron:FDFporhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100/62Tassinari, Clarissainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-19T11:30:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/100Revistahttps://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdfPUBhttp://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/oai||drcildo@direitofranca.br1983-42251983-4225opendoar:2020-04-19T11:30:23Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart As Transformações da Teoria do Direito Contemporânea no Contexto do Trinômio Moral-Princípios-Discricionariedade - Uma abordagem no marco de O Conceito de Direito de Herbert Hart |
title |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart |
spellingShingle |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart Tassinari, Clarissa Discricionariedade Pós-positivismo Positivismo jurídico Herbert Hart |
title_short |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart |
title_full |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart |
title_fullStr |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart |
title_full_unstemmed |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart |
title_sort |
The transformations of the contemporary Law theory in the context of the trinomial: moral-principles-discretion - an approach within the boundary of “The Concept of Law” from Hebert Hart |
author |
Tassinari, Clarissa |
author_facet |
Tassinari, Clarissa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tassinari, Clarissa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discricionariedade Pós-positivismo Positivismo jurídico Herbert Hart |
topic |
Discricionariedade Pós-positivismo Positivismo jurídico Herbert Hart |
description |
The concept of Law produced by the modernity was sitting on what has been theoretically developed by the juridical positivism. With the transformations occurred in society and also on the Law theory the juridical contemporary paradigm is characterized by the trinomial moral-principles-discretion, that is, a) for the predominance of using of principles, b) for the incorporation of morality to the Law, and c) for the recognition of the judges’ discretion power. Because of that, the query for the concept of Law seems to gain a new answer forged from what has been academically denominated of postpositivism. In this context, the goal of this article is to analyze the juridical positivism of Hebert Hart with regards to the question of Law conceived as a system of rules and the criterion of choice in the Law interpretation, establishing at last a parallel between its proposal and the current transformations through which the theory of Law goes through. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100 10.21207/1983.4225.100 |
url |
http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21207/1983.4225.100 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.revista.direitofranca.br/index.php/refdf/article/view/100/62 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca; v. 3 n. 1 (2010) 1983-4225 reponame:Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca instname:Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF) instacron:FDF |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF) |
instacron_str |
FDF |
institution |
FDF |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Direito de Franca - Faculdade de Direito de Franca (FDF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||drcildo@direitofranca.br |
_version_ |
1754644628305346560 |