Contemporary records as evidence of action
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1994 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1976 |
Resumo: | Records are the most reliable source of evidence, because they are interrelated as to meaning, authentic as to genesis, and impartial as to purpose (i.e. they are not drawn up for the benefit of posterity, but as a means for carrying out affairs). However, in modern times, their increasing volume and the need for drastic selections are obscuring their meaning; records creators have become very much aware of the possible consequences of generating and preserving documentation of their actions; and information technologies have made it far too easy to manipulate and obliterate evidence without leaving any trace of it. It is the primary obligation of modern achivists to protect the integrity, authenticity, and impartiality of contemporary records in the methods used to treat them, so that they will remain reliable historical and legal evidence for generations to come. This paper will discuss the above issues and provide recommendations on the most appropriate ways for achivists to meet their responsability. |
id |
FGV-10_fbb65978f379f32b7a42f4a1b6699591 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/1976 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-10 |
network_name_str |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contemporary records as evidence of actionRegistros documentais contemporâneos como provas de ação.Records are the most reliable source of evidence, because they are interrelated as to meaning, authentic as to genesis, and impartial as to purpose (i.e. they are not drawn up for the benefit of posterity, but as a means for carrying out affairs). However, in modern times, their increasing volume and the need for drastic selections are obscuring their meaning; records creators have become very much aware of the possible consequences of generating and preserving documentation of their actions; and information technologies have made it far too easy to manipulate and obliterate evidence without leaving any trace of it. It is the primary obligation of modern achivists to protect the integrity, authenticity, and impartiality of contemporary records in the methods used to treat them, so that they will remain reliable historical and legal evidence for generations to come. This paper will discuss the above issues and provide recommendations on the most appropriate ways for achivists to meet their responsability.Documentos são as fontes de evidência mais confiáveis, porque são interdependentes do ponto de vista do significado, autênticos do ponto de vista de sua gênese e imparciais do ponto de vista de sua finalidade (quer dizer, não são produzidos para a posteridade, mas sim como um meio de viabilizar tarefas). Entretanto, nos tempos modernos, o aumento de seu volume e a necessidade de seleções drásticas estão obscurecendo seu significado; produtores de documentos se tornaram conscientes das possíveis conseqüências de se criar e preservar registros de suas ações; e as informações tecnológicas têm facilitado muito a manipulação e falsificação de evidências sem que sejam deixados "vestígios". Uma obrigação básica dos modernos arquivistas é proteger a integridade, autenticidade e imparcialidade dos documentos contemporâneos nos métodos utilizados para tratá-los, para que permaneçam para as próximas gerações como evidências históricas e legais. Este artigo discute os assuntos mencionados acima e dá recomendações sobre os modos mais apropriados pelos quais os arquivistas podem cumprir suas tarefas.Editora FGV1994-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1976Revista Estudos Históricos; Vol. 7 No. 13 (1994): CPDOC 20 years; 49-64Revista Estudos Históricos; v. 7 n. 13 (1994): CPDOC 20 anos; 49-642178-14940103-2186reponame:Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1976/2164Duranti, Lucianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-06-14T21:04:09Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/1976Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rehONGhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/oai||biblioteca.digital@fgv.br||eh@fgv.br2178-14940103-2186opendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:28.943601Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contemporary records as evidence of action Registros documentais contemporâneos como provas de ação. |
title |
Contemporary records as evidence of action |
spellingShingle |
Contemporary records as evidence of action Duranti, Luciana |
title_short |
Contemporary records as evidence of action |
title_full |
Contemporary records as evidence of action |
title_fullStr |
Contemporary records as evidence of action |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contemporary records as evidence of action |
title_sort |
Contemporary records as evidence of action |
author |
Duranti, Luciana |
author_facet |
Duranti, Luciana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duranti, Luciana |
description |
Records are the most reliable source of evidence, because they are interrelated as to meaning, authentic as to genesis, and impartial as to purpose (i.e. they are not drawn up for the benefit of posterity, but as a means for carrying out affairs). However, in modern times, their increasing volume and the need for drastic selections are obscuring their meaning; records creators have become very much aware of the possible consequences of generating and preserving documentation of their actions; and information technologies have made it far too easy to manipulate and obliterate evidence without leaving any trace of it. It is the primary obligation of modern achivists to protect the integrity, authenticity, and impartiality of contemporary records in the methods used to treat them, so that they will remain reliable historical and legal evidence for generations to come. This paper will discuss the above issues and provide recommendations on the most appropriate ways for achivists to meet their responsability. |
publishDate |
1994 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1994-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1976 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1976 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1976/2164 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora FGV |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora FGV |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estudos Históricos; Vol. 7 No. 13 (1994): CPDOC 20 years; 49-64 Revista Estudos Históricos; v. 7 n. 13 (1994): CPDOC 20 anos; 49-64 2178-1494 0103-2186 reponame:Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
collection |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||biblioteca.digital@fgv.br||eh@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798942524521316352 |