The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24136 |
Resumo: | The work features the environmental compensation established by the law on the national system of conservation units (SNUC), since its creation, the Supreme Court ruling of the unconstitutionality direct action-ADI nº 3.378/df (that declared its partial unconstitutionality with text reduction), and the last regulation on the matter by the administration as Per Decree nº 6.848/09, intended to be in harmony with the Supreme Court decision. From the analysis of the decree, we can infer that some standards set for the environmental compensation calculation, in fact retake the notion of a percentage related to the cost of the business impacting the environment, thereby violating the Supreme Court decision and the principle of separation of powers. On the other side, the new text of art. 31 of the previous regulation, as amended by decree nº 6.948 provides for the competence of Ibama (the Federal Environmental Agency) for determining the compensation amount, so that one may conclude that only businesses that depend on Ibama’s licensing (acting on the exercise of its exclusive federal competence) may be liable for the environmental compensation. Summing up, the text analyzes the innovation introduced by decree nº 6.848 and also advocates the juridical nature of a tax for the snuc compensation, which so far has not been tested by the Supreme Court, although it should not be neglected |
id |
FGV-2_44210b538e920766ffa6de9f9edff934 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24136 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09A compensação ambiental prevista pelo Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação (SNUC): a ADI nº 3.378 e o decreto nº 6.848/09environmental compensationsnuc compensationregulationenvironmentenvironmental impactCOMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTALCOMPENSAÇÃO SNUCREGULAMENTAÇÃOMEIO AMBIENTEIMPACTO AMBIENTALThe work features the environmental compensation established by the law on the national system of conservation units (SNUC), since its creation, the Supreme Court ruling of the unconstitutionality direct action-ADI nº 3.378/df (that declared its partial unconstitutionality with text reduction), and the last regulation on the matter by the administration as Per Decree nº 6.848/09, intended to be in harmony with the Supreme Court decision. From the analysis of the decree, we can infer that some standards set for the environmental compensation calculation, in fact retake the notion of a percentage related to the cost of the business impacting the environment, thereby violating the Supreme Court decision and the principle of separation of powers. On the other side, the new text of art. 31 of the previous regulation, as amended by decree nº 6.948 provides for the competence of Ibama (the Federal Environmental Agency) for determining the compensation amount, so that one may conclude that only businesses that depend on Ibama’s licensing (acting on the exercise of its exclusive federal competence) may be liable for the environmental compensation. Summing up, the text analyzes the innovation introduced by decree nº 6.848 and also advocates the juridical nature of a tax for the snuc compensation, which so far has not been tested by the Supreme Court, although it should not be neglected O TRABALHO TRAÇA A TRAJETÓRIA DA COMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTAL INSTITUÍDA PELA LEI DO SISTEMA NACIONAL DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO (SNUC), DA SUA CRIAÇÃO, PASSANDO PELO JULGAMENTO DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL NA ADI Nº 3.378/DF (QUE A JULGOU PARCIALMENTE INCONSTITUCIONAL, COM REDUÇÃO DE TEXTO), ATÉ A ÚLTIMA REGULAMENTAÇÃO DA MATÉRIA PELO PODER EXECUTIVO (DECRETO Nº 6.848, DE 2009), PRETENSAMENTE EM CONSONÂNCIA COM A DECISÃO DA CORTE. DA ANÁLISE DESTE DECRETO, DEPREENDE-SE QUE FORAM PREVISTOS CRITÉRIOS PARA O CÁLCULO DA COMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTAL OS QUAIS, NA VERDADE, RETOMAM A NOÇÃO DE PERCENTUAL E VÍNCULO AO CUSTO DO EMPREENDIMENTO IMPACTANTE, EM AFRONTA À DECISÃO PROFERIDA PELO STF, CONFIGURANDO VIOLAÇÃO À SEPARAÇÃO DE PODERES. POR OUTRO LADO, A NOVA REDAÇÃO DO ART. 31 DO REGULAMENTO ANTERIOR, INTRODUZIDA PELO DECRETO CITADO, PREVÊ A COMPETÊNCIA DO IBAMA, ÓRGÃO FEDERAL DE LICENCIAMENTO AMBIENTAL, PARA A FIXAÇÃO DO VALOR DA COMPENSAÇÃO, DAÍ SE DEDUZINDO QUE APENAS AOS EMPREENDIMENTOS SUJEITOS A LICENCIAMENTO PELO IBAMA, NO EXERCÍCIO DE COMPETÊNCIA FEDERAL EXCLUSIVA, PODERÁ SER APLICADA A COMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTAL. EM SÍNTESE, ESTE ENSAIO ANALISA AS INOVAÇÕES TRAZIDAS PELO DECRETO Nº 6.848/09, ASSIM COMO SUSTENTA A NATUREZA TRIBUTÁRIA DA COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC, AINDA NÃO DEBATIDA PELO STF, MAS QUE NÃO DEVE SER OLVIDADAEscola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2010-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24136Revista Direito GV; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2010): jul.-dez (12); 493-502Revista Direito GV; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2010): jul.-dez (12); 493-502Revista Direito GV; v. 6 n. 2 (2010): jul.-dez (12); 493-5022317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24136/22916Domingues, José MarcosCarneiro, Júlia Silva Araújoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-06T16:53:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24136Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-06T16:53:34Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 A compensação ambiental prevista pelo Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação (SNUC): a ADI nº 3.378 e o decreto nº 6.848/09 |
title |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 |
spellingShingle |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 Domingues, José Marcos environmental compensation snuc compensation regulation environment environmental impact COMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTAL COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC REGULAMENTAÇÃO MEIO AMBIENTE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL |
title_short |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 |
title_full |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 |
title_fullStr |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 |
title_sort |
The environmental compensation concerning the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC): the unconstitutionality action ADI nº 3.378 and the decree nº 6.848/09 |
author |
Domingues, José Marcos |
author_facet |
Domingues, José Marcos Carneiro, Júlia Silva Araújo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carneiro, Júlia Silva Araújo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Domingues, José Marcos Carneiro, Júlia Silva Araújo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
environmental compensation snuc compensation regulation environment environmental impact COMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTAL COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC REGULAMENTAÇÃO MEIO AMBIENTE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL |
topic |
environmental compensation snuc compensation regulation environment environmental impact COMPENSAÇÃO AMBIENTAL COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC REGULAMENTAÇÃO MEIO AMBIENTE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL |
description |
The work features the environmental compensation established by the law on the national system of conservation units (SNUC), since its creation, the Supreme Court ruling of the unconstitutionality direct action-ADI nº 3.378/df (that declared its partial unconstitutionality with text reduction), and the last regulation on the matter by the administration as Per Decree nº 6.848/09, intended to be in harmony with the Supreme Court decision. From the analysis of the decree, we can infer that some standards set for the environmental compensation calculation, in fact retake the notion of a percentage related to the cost of the business impacting the environment, thereby violating the Supreme Court decision and the principle of separation of powers. On the other side, the new text of art. 31 of the previous regulation, as amended by decree nº 6.948 provides for the competence of Ibama (the Federal Environmental Agency) for determining the compensation amount, so that one may conclude that only businesses that depend on Ibama’s licensing (acting on the exercise of its exclusive federal competence) may be liable for the environmental compensation. Summing up, the text analyzes the innovation introduced by decree nº 6.848 and also advocates the juridical nature of a tax for the snuc compensation, which so far has not been tested by the Supreme Court, although it should not be neglected |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24136 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24136 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24136/22916 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2010): jul.-dez (12); 493-502 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2010): jul.-dez (12); 493-502 Revista Direito GV; v. 6 n. 2 (2010): jul.-dez (12); 493-502 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943708482109440 |