The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Domingues, José Marcos
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376
Resumo: This text examines and criticizes recent Brazilian Supreme Court verdict, not in definite yet, which judges legitimate the financial Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC) although giving partial origin to the direct action brought by the national industry confederation in order to “declare the unconstitutionality of expressions indicated in the relater’s readjusted vote”. The illegitimacy of legal prevision would be in the fact that the refereed compensation value “should be fixed proportionally to the environmental impact, after study in which adversary and legal defense are asseverated, prescinded the “percentage fixation on the costs of enterprise”. The act 9985, 2000, 18th july, created the national system of units of conservation in which units of “integral protection group” are inserted (art. 8º).  The act determines the payment of a compensation to support them and its implantation and manutention will affect the respective receipt (art. 36, CAPUT). The text discuss the possibilities of interpretation of general clauses related to the case, boarding the limits of judicial power action and suggesting the best solution for the concrete case. 
id FGV-2_57a236fcc755c1a6ac9ebcd419b75991
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24376
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DFO Supremo Tribunal e a Compensação SNUC. A ADI 3.378-DFBrazilian Supreme CourtADINcompensationSNUCenvironmentimpactSTFADINCOMPENSAÇÃOSNUCMEIO-AMBIENTEIMPACTOThis text examines and criticizes recent Brazilian Supreme Court verdict, not in definite yet, which judges legitimate the financial Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC) although giving partial origin to the direct action brought by the national industry confederation in order to “declare the unconstitutionality of expressions indicated in the relater’s readjusted vote”. The illegitimacy of legal prevision would be in the fact that the refereed compensation value “should be fixed proportionally to the environmental impact, after study in which adversary and legal defense are asseverated, prescinded the “percentage fixation on the costs of enterprise”. The act 9985, 2000, 18th july, created the national system of units of conservation in which units of “integral protection group” are inserted (art. 8º).  The act determines the payment of a compensation to support them and its implantation and manutention will affect the respective receipt (art. 36, CAPUT). The text discuss the possibilities of interpretation of general clauses related to the case, boarding the limits of judicial power action and suggesting the best solution for the concrete case. ESTE TEXTO EXAMINA E CRITICA RECENTE JULGAMENTO DO STF, AINDA NÃO DEFINITIVO, QUE JULGA LEGÍTIMA A CHAMADA COMPENSAÇÃO FINANCEIRA SISTEMA NACIONAL DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA NATUREZA (SNUC), EMBORA DANDO PARCIAL PROCEDÊNCIA À AÇÃO DIRETA AJUIZADA PELA CONFEDERAÇÃO NACIONAL DA INDÚSTRIA, PARA “DECLARAR A INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS EXPRESSÕES INDICADAS NO VOTO REAJUSTADO DO RELATOR”. A ILEGITIMIDADE DA PREVISÃO LEGAL ESTARIA NO FATO DE QUE O VALOR DA COMPENSAÇÃO EM QUESTÃO “É DE SER FIXADO PROPORCIONALMENTE AO IMPACTO AMBIENTAL, APÓS ESTUDO EM QUE SE ASSEGUREM O CONTRADITÓRIO E A AMPLA DEFESA”, SENDO PRESCINDÍVEL A “FIXAÇÃO DE PERCENTUAL SOBRE OS CUSTOS DO EMPREENDIMENTO”. A LEI Nº 9.985, DE 18 DE JULHO DE 2000, CRIOU O SISTEMA NACIONAL DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO, NO BOJO DO QUAL SE INSEREM AS UNIDADES DO “GRUPO DE PROTEÇÃO INTEGRAL” (ART. 8º); EM APOIO ÀS MESMAS, A LEI DETERMINA O PAGAMENTO DE UMA COMPENSAÇÃO, A CUJA IMPLANTAÇÃO E MANUTENÇÃO ESTARÁ AFETADA A RECEITA RESPECTIVA (ART. 36, caput). O TEXTO DISCUTE AS POSSIBILIDADES DE INTERPRETAÇÃO DAS CLÁUSULAS GERAIS RELATIVAS AO CASO, ABORDANDO OS LIMITES DA ATUAÇÃO DO PODER JURISDICIONAL E SUGERINDO O QUE JULGA SER A MELHOR SOLUÇÃO PARA O CASO CONCRETO.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 125-146Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-146Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-1462317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376/23156Domingues, José Marcosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-07T15:06:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24376Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-07T15:06:41Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
O Supremo Tribunal e a Compensação SNUC. A ADI 3.378-DF
title The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
spellingShingle The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
Domingues, José Marcos
Brazilian Supreme Court
ADIN
compensation
SNUC
environment
impact
STF
ADIN
COMPENSAÇÃO
SNUC
MEIO-AMBIENTE
IMPACTO
title_short The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
title_full The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
title_fullStr The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
title_full_unstemmed The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
title_sort The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
author Domingues, José Marcos
author_facet Domingues, José Marcos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Domingues, José Marcos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazilian Supreme Court
ADIN
compensation
SNUC
environment
impact
STF
ADIN
COMPENSAÇÃO
SNUC
MEIO-AMBIENTE
IMPACTO
topic Brazilian Supreme Court
ADIN
compensation
SNUC
environment
impact
STF
ADIN
COMPENSAÇÃO
SNUC
MEIO-AMBIENTE
IMPACTO
description This text examines and criticizes recent Brazilian Supreme Court verdict, not in definite yet, which judges legitimate the financial Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC) although giving partial origin to the direct action brought by the national industry confederation in order to “declare the unconstitutionality of expressions indicated in the relater’s readjusted vote”. The illegitimacy of legal prevision would be in the fact that the refereed compensation value “should be fixed proportionally to the environmental impact, after study in which adversary and legal defense are asseverated, prescinded the “percentage fixation on the costs of enterprise”. The act 9985, 2000, 18th july, created the national system of units of conservation in which units of “integral protection group” are inserted (art. 8º).  The act determines the payment of a compensation to support them and its implantation and manutention will affect the respective receipt (art. 36, CAPUT). The text discuss the possibilities of interpretation of general clauses related to the case, boarding the limits of judicial power action and suggesting the best solution for the concrete case. 
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376/23156
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 125-146
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-146
Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-146
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943708841771008