Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves Nascimento, Abel José
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lucena de Lima, Bruno, Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo, Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder, Prado Lyra, Ricardo, Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela, de Alencar Menezes, Daniela, Lima Silva, Fabiana, Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina, Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)
Texto Completo: https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26
Resumo: Purpose: To investigate and to compare the extracts of the stalks (Bpc-EtOH) and roots (Bpr-EtOH) from Bidens pilosa on ethanol-gastric ulcer model rats and acude toxicologial screening in mice. Methods: in the ulcer model were accessed the extracts on etanol-induced rat gastric lesions (n = 4-5). To analyze the safety toxicological those extracts in vivo, the acute toxicity screening was perfomed with sigle dose extracts and during three days in mice (n=5). Results: the Bpc-EtOH (150 and 500 mg/kg) protected the rat gastric mucosa layer (ULA=138.0 ± 30.5 and 96.3 ± 11.8 mm2, respectivelly). The Bpr-EtOH induced similar effects on all doses (ULA=178.3 ± 10.0; 67.4 ± 9.5 and 35.5 ± 14.3 mm2) and the most efficacy (Emax) than Bpc-EtOH. The omeprazole (ULA=145.7 ± 19.9 mm2) showed also protective effects as expected. The histophatology analyzes corroborated those results. The maximum dose 500 mg/kg (o.r.) of theextracts is safe and do not cause damages to animails because dose 2 g/kg (o.r.) in toxicological screening did fail.Conclusion: The stalks and roots from B. pilosa also present actives metabolites for antiulcer activity, it may be moreconcentration in roots or are different than stalks, and both are safe in doses tested.
id FMO-1_3570e2b978d5f163a780fa7e89602f45
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.afmo.emnuvens.com.br:article/26
network_acronym_str FMO-1
network_name_str Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extractsEfeito antiúlcera de Bidens pilosa L. e segurança toxicológica em roedoresPlanta medicinalExtrato vegetalAgente antiúlceraToxicidadeMedicinal plantPlant extractAnti-ulcerToxicityPurpose: To investigate and to compare the extracts of the stalks (Bpc-EtOH) and roots (Bpr-EtOH) from Bidens pilosa on ethanol-gastric ulcer model rats and acude toxicologial screening in mice. Methods: in the ulcer model were accessed the extracts on etanol-induced rat gastric lesions (n = 4-5). To analyze the safety toxicological those extracts in vivo, the acute toxicity screening was perfomed with sigle dose extracts and during three days in mice (n=5). Results: the Bpc-EtOH (150 and 500 mg/kg) protected the rat gastric mucosa layer (ULA=138.0 ± 30.5 and 96.3 ± 11.8 mm2, respectivelly). The Bpr-EtOH induced similar effects on all doses (ULA=178.3 ± 10.0; 67.4 ± 9.5 and 35.5 ± 14.3 mm2) and the most efficacy (Emax) than Bpc-EtOH. The omeprazole (ULA=145.7 ± 19.9 mm2) showed also protective effects as expected. The histophatology analyzes corroborated those results. The maximum dose 500 mg/kg (o.r.) of theextracts is safe and do not cause damages to animails because dose 2 g/kg (o.r.) in toxicological screening did fail.Conclusion: The stalks and roots from B. pilosa also present actives metabolites for antiulcer activity, it may be moreconcentration in roots or are different than stalks, and both are safe in doses tested.Objetivo: Investigar e comparar a atividade antiúlcera de extratos obtidos das raízes (Bpr-EtOH) e do caule (Bpc-EtOH) de Bidens pilosa, em ensaios de úlceras estomacais induzidas por etanol absoluto em ratos e na triagem toxicológica aguda em camundongos. Métodos: Para o ensaio antiúlcera foi utilizado o modelo de úlcera induzida por etanol absoluto em ratos (n = 4-5). Para a triagem toxicológica aguda foram utilizados camundongos machos (n = 5), tratados com dose única dos extratos separadamente com 2 g/kg, via oral (VO) ou veículo, monitorados durante três dias. Os valores de p < 0,05, pelo teste t ou ANOVA, foram considerados significantes. Todos os procedimentos foram aprovados pelo CEUA/UNINOVE. Resultados: Tanto o extrato Bpc-EtOH (150 e 500 mg/kg) protegeu a mucosa gástrica (ALU = 138,0 ± 30,5 e 96,3 ± 11,8 mm2, respectivamente), quanto o extrato Bpr-EtOH (50, 150 e 500mg/kg) induziu o mesmo efeito, porém todas as doses (ALU = 178,3 ± 10,0; 67,4 ± 9,5 e 35,5 ± 14,3 mm2,  respectivamente) foram significativamente diferentes do controle, e mais eficaz (Emax) que o extrato Bpc-EtOH. O omeprazol (ALU = 145,7 ± 19,9 mm2) também promoveu efeito semelhante aos extratos. A análise histopatológica das amostras do tecido confirmou a proteção gástrica. A dose máxima de 500mg/kg dos extratos é segura e não deve causar danos aos animais, uma vez que na triagem toxicológica, utilizando a dose de 2g/kg, não foram verificados danos importantes nem mortes. Conclusão: Ocaule e raiz de B. pilosa também apresentam princípios ativos com atividade antiúlcera, sendo que estão mais concentrados na raiz ou são diferentes daqueles no caule e, ambos, seguros nas doses utilizadas. Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda2018-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/2610.56102/afmo.2018.26Annals of Olinda Medical School; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018); 10-15Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda; v. 1 n. 2 (2018); 10-152674-84872595-1734reponame:Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)instname:Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)instacron:FMOporhttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26/24Alves Nascimento, Abel JoséLucena de Lima, BrunoNovaes da Silva, Artur DaniloCarvalho Souza Lima Silva, HelderPrado Lyra, RicardoSaraiva Dantas, Gabrielade Alencar Menezes, DanielaLima Silva, FabianaAlmeida Pereira, Schirley CristinaVeiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-04T18:10:39Zoai:ojs.afmo.emnuvens.com.br:article/26Revistahttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmoPUBhttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/oaianaisfmo@fmo.edu.br2674-84872595-1734opendoar:2023-07-04T18:10:39Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
Efeito antiúlcera de Bidens pilosa L. e segurança toxicológica em roedores
title Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
spellingShingle Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
Alves Nascimento, Abel José
Planta medicinal
Extrato vegetal
Agente antiúlcera
Toxicidade
Medicinal plant
Plant extract
Anti-ulcer
Toxicity
title_short Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
title_full Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
title_fullStr Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
title_full_unstemmed Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
title_sort Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
author Alves Nascimento, Abel José
author_facet Alves Nascimento, Abel José
Lucena de Lima, Bruno
Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo
Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder
Prado Lyra, Ricardo
Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela
de Alencar Menezes, Daniela
Lima Silva, Fabiana
Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina
Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena
author_role author
author2 Lucena de Lima, Bruno
Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo
Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder
Prado Lyra, Ricardo
Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela
de Alencar Menezes, Daniela
Lima Silva, Fabiana
Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina
Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves Nascimento, Abel José
Lucena de Lima, Bruno
Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo
Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder
Prado Lyra, Ricardo
Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela
de Alencar Menezes, Daniela
Lima Silva, Fabiana
Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina
Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Planta medicinal
Extrato vegetal
Agente antiúlcera
Toxicidade
Medicinal plant
Plant extract
Anti-ulcer
Toxicity
topic Planta medicinal
Extrato vegetal
Agente antiúlcera
Toxicidade
Medicinal plant
Plant extract
Anti-ulcer
Toxicity
description Purpose: To investigate and to compare the extracts of the stalks (Bpc-EtOH) and roots (Bpr-EtOH) from Bidens pilosa on ethanol-gastric ulcer model rats and acude toxicologial screening in mice. Methods: in the ulcer model were accessed the extracts on etanol-induced rat gastric lesions (n = 4-5). To analyze the safety toxicological those extracts in vivo, the acute toxicity screening was perfomed with sigle dose extracts and during three days in mice (n=5). Results: the Bpc-EtOH (150 and 500 mg/kg) protected the rat gastric mucosa layer (ULA=138.0 ± 30.5 and 96.3 ± 11.8 mm2, respectivelly). The Bpr-EtOH induced similar effects on all doses (ULA=178.3 ± 10.0; 67.4 ± 9.5 and 35.5 ± 14.3 mm2) and the most efficacy (Emax) than Bpc-EtOH. The omeprazole (ULA=145.7 ± 19.9 mm2) showed also protective effects as expected. The histophatology analyzes corroborated those results. The maximum dose 500 mg/kg (o.r.) of theextracts is safe and do not cause damages to animails because dose 2 g/kg (o.r.) in toxicological screening did fail.Conclusion: The stalks and roots from B. pilosa also present actives metabolites for antiulcer activity, it may be moreconcentration in roots or are different than stalks, and both are safe in doses tested.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26
10.56102/afmo.2018.26
url https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26
identifier_str_mv 10.56102/afmo.2018.26
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26/24
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Annals of Olinda Medical School; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018); 10-15
Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda; v. 1 n. 2 (2018); 10-15
2674-8487
2595-1734
reponame:Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)
instname:Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)
instacron:FMO
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)
instacron_str FMO
institution FMO
reponame_str Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)
collection Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv anaisfmo@fmo.edu.br
_version_ 1796798259850641408