Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To investigate and to compare the extracts of the stalks (Bpc-EtOH) and roots (Bpr-EtOH) from Bidens pilosa on ethanol-gastric ulcer model rats and acude toxicologial screening in mice. Methods: in the ulcer model were accessed the extracts on etanol-induced rat gastric lesions (n = 4-5). To analyze the safety toxicological those extracts in vivo, the acute toxicity screening was perfomed with sigle dose extracts and during three days in mice (n=5). Results: the Bpc-EtOH (150 and 500 mg/kg) protected the rat gastric mucosa layer (ULA=138.0 ± 30.5 and 96.3 ± 11.8 mm2, respectivelly). The Bpr-EtOH induced similar effects on all doses (ULA=178.3 ± 10.0; 67.4 ± 9.5 and 35.5 ± 14.3 mm2) and the most efficacy (Emax) than Bpc-EtOH. The omeprazole (ULA=145.7 ± 19.9 mm2) showed also protective effects as expected. The histophatology analyzes corroborated those results. The maximum dose 500 mg/kg (o.r.) of theextracts is safe and do not cause damages to animails because dose 2 g/kg (o.r.) in toxicological screening did fail.Conclusion: The stalks and roots from B. pilosa also present actives metabolites for antiulcer activity, it may be moreconcentration in roots or are different than stalks, and both are safe in doses tested. |
id |
FMO-1_3570e2b978d5f163a780fa7e89602f45 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.afmo.emnuvens.com.br:article/26 |
network_acronym_str |
FMO-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extractsEfeito antiúlcera de Bidens pilosa L. e segurança toxicológica em roedoresPlanta medicinalExtrato vegetalAgente antiúlceraToxicidadeMedicinal plantPlant extractAnti-ulcerToxicityPurpose: To investigate and to compare the extracts of the stalks (Bpc-EtOH) and roots (Bpr-EtOH) from Bidens pilosa on ethanol-gastric ulcer model rats and acude toxicologial screening in mice. Methods: in the ulcer model were accessed the extracts on etanol-induced rat gastric lesions (n = 4-5). To analyze the safety toxicological those extracts in vivo, the acute toxicity screening was perfomed with sigle dose extracts and during three days in mice (n=5). Results: the Bpc-EtOH (150 and 500 mg/kg) protected the rat gastric mucosa layer (ULA=138.0 ± 30.5 and 96.3 ± 11.8 mm2, respectivelly). The Bpr-EtOH induced similar effects on all doses (ULA=178.3 ± 10.0; 67.4 ± 9.5 and 35.5 ± 14.3 mm2) and the most efficacy (Emax) than Bpc-EtOH. The omeprazole (ULA=145.7 ± 19.9 mm2) showed also protective effects as expected. The histophatology analyzes corroborated those results. The maximum dose 500 mg/kg (o.r.) of theextracts is safe and do not cause damages to animails because dose 2 g/kg (o.r.) in toxicological screening did fail.Conclusion: The stalks and roots from B. pilosa also present actives metabolites for antiulcer activity, it may be moreconcentration in roots or are different than stalks, and both are safe in doses tested.Objetivo: Investigar e comparar a atividade antiúlcera de extratos obtidos das raízes (Bpr-EtOH) e do caule (Bpc-EtOH) de Bidens pilosa, em ensaios de úlceras estomacais induzidas por etanol absoluto em ratos e na triagem toxicológica aguda em camundongos. Métodos: Para o ensaio antiúlcera foi utilizado o modelo de úlcera induzida por etanol absoluto em ratos (n = 4-5). Para a triagem toxicológica aguda foram utilizados camundongos machos (n = 5), tratados com dose única dos extratos separadamente com 2 g/kg, via oral (VO) ou veículo, monitorados durante três dias. Os valores de p < 0,05, pelo teste t ou ANOVA, foram considerados significantes. Todos os procedimentos foram aprovados pelo CEUA/UNINOVE. Resultados: Tanto o extrato Bpc-EtOH (150 e 500 mg/kg) protegeu a mucosa gástrica (ALU = 138,0 ± 30,5 e 96,3 ± 11,8 mm2, respectivamente), quanto o extrato Bpr-EtOH (50, 150 e 500mg/kg) induziu o mesmo efeito, porém todas as doses (ALU = 178,3 ± 10,0; 67,4 ± 9,5 e 35,5 ± 14,3 mm2, respectivamente) foram significativamente diferentes do controle, e mais eficaz (Emax) que o extrato Bpc-EtOH. O omeprazol (ALU = 145,7 ± 19,9 mm2) também promoveu efeito semelhante aos extratos. A análise histopatológica das amostras do tecido confirmou a proteção gástrica. A dose máxima de 500mg/kg dos extratos é segura e não deve causar danos aos animais, uma vez que na triagem toxicológica, utilizando a dose de 2g/kg, não foram verificados danos importantes nem mortes. Conclusão: Ocaule e raiz de B. pilosa também apresentam princípios ativos com atividade antiúlcera, sendo que estão mais concentrados na raiz ou são diferentes daqueles no caule e, ambos, seguros nas doses utilizadas. Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda2018-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/2610.56102/afmo.2018.26Annals of Olinda Medical School; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018); 10-15Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda; v. 1 n. 2 (2018); 10-152674-84872595-1734reponame:Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online)instname:Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)instacron:FMOporhttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26/24Alves Nascimento, Abel JoséLucena de Lima, BrunoNovaes da Silva, Artur DaniloCarvalho Souza Lima Silva, HelderPrado Lyra, RicardoSaraiva Dantas, Gabrielade Alencar Menezes, DanielaLima Silva, FabianaAlmeida Pereira, Schirley CristinaVeiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-04T18:10:39Zoai:ojs.afmo.emnuvens.com.br:article/26Revistahttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmoPUBhttps://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/oaianaisfmo@fmo.edu.br2674-84872595-1734opendoar:2023-07-04T18:10:39Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts Efeito antiúlcera de Bidens pilosa L. e segurança toxicológica em roedores |
title |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts |
spellingShingle |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts Alves Nascimento, Abel José Planta medicinal Extrato vegetal Agente antiúlcera Toxicidade Medicinal plant Plant extract Anti-ulcer Toxicity |
title_short |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts |
title_full |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts |
title_fullStr |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts |
title_sort |
Antiulcer effect of Bidens pilosa L. and toxicological safety in rodents: comparative study between stem and root extracts |
author |
Alves Nascimento, Abel José |
author_facet |
Alves Nascimento, Abel José Lucena de Lima, Bruno Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder Prado Lyra, Ricardo Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela de Alencar Menezes, Daniela Lima Silva, Fabiana Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lucena de Lima, Bruno Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder Prado Lyra, Ricardo Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela de Alencar Menezes, Daniela Lima Silva, Fabiana Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves Nascimento, Abel José Lucena de Lima, Bruno Novaes da Silva, Artur Danilo Carvalho Souza Lima Silva, Helder Prado Lyra, Ricardo Saraiva Dantas, Gabriela de Alencar Menezes, Daniela Lima Silva, Fabiana Almeida Pereira, Schirley Cristina Veiga da Silva, Joelmir Lucena |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Planta medicinal Extrato vegetal Agente antiúlcera Toxicidade Medicinal plant Plant extract Anti-ulcer Toxicity |
topic |
Planta medicinal Extrato vegetal Agente antiúlcera Toxicidade Medicinal plant Plant extract Anti-ulcer Toxicity |
description |
Purpose: To investigate and to compare the extracts of the stalks (Bpc-EtOH) and roots (Bpr-EtOH) from Bidens pilosa on ethanol-gastric ulcer model rats and acude toxicologial screening in mice. Methods: in the ulcer model were accessed the extracts on etanol-induced rat gastric lesions (n = 4-5). To analyze the safety toxicological those extracts in vivo, the acute toxicity screening was perfomed with sigle dose extracts and during three days in mice (n=5). Results: the Bpc-EtOH (150 and 500 mg/kg) protected the rat gastric mucosa layer (ULA=138.0 ± 30.5 and 96.3 ± 11.8 mm2, respectivelly). The Bpr-EtOH induced similar effects on all doses (ULA=178.3 ± 10.0; 67.4 ± 9.5 and 35.5 ± 14.3 mm2) and the most efficacy (Emax) than Bpc-EtOH. The omeprazole (ULA=145.7 ± 19.9 mm2) showed also protective effects as expected. The histophatology analyzes corroborated those results. The maximum dose 500 mg/kg (o.r.) of theextracts is safe and do not cause damages to animails because dose 2 g/kg (o.r.) in toxicological screening did fail.Conclusion: The stalks and roots from B. pilosa also present actives metabolites for antiulcer activity, it may be moreconcentration in roots or are different than stalks, and both are safe in doses tested. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26 10.56102/afmo.2018.26 |
url |
https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.56102/afmo.2018.26 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://afmo.emnuvens.com.br/afmo/article/view/26/24 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Annals of Olinda Medical School; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018); 10-15 Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda; v. 1 n. 2 (2018); 10-15 2674-8487 2595-1734 reponame:Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) instname:Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO) instacron:FMO |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO) |
instacron_str |
FMO |
institution |
FMO |
reponame_str |
Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) |
collection |
Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (Online) - Faculdade de Medicina de Olinda (FMO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
anaisfmo@fmo.edu.br |
_version_ |
1796798259850641408 |