Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39 |
Resumo: | The ideas of procedural consensus and celerity increasingly shape the Criminal Procedural Law of Democratic countries. Negotiated criminal justice solutions have been multiplying in the last years, posing a multiplicity of challenges to the pure and traditional procedural doctrine, to the rights traditionally assured to the procedural actors, being important to question if the (even more) organized criminality and the transnational and technological methods of crime did not shift the center of the confrontation between the efficient administration of justice and the rights of the accused. The Portuguese Republic is no exception: without a legislative framework explicitly guarantying a way to benefit those who collaborate with Justice, one must first question if the Criminal Procedural Code allows or may allow criminal Justice negotiated solutions; we will analyze some foreseen legal solutions of consensualism, not forgeting the Portuguese doctrine and courts decisions. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_749c2d22a076db472c35c7dbb78c3472 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/39 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?Soluções negociadas de justiça penal no direito português: uma realidade atual numa galáxia distante?Negotiated Criminal JusticePortuguese Criminal Procedure LawConsensus.Justiça Penal negociadaProcesso Penal portuguêsConsenso.The ideas of procedural consensus and celerity increasingly shape the Criminal Procedural Law of Democratic countries. Negotiated criminal justice solutions have been multiplying in the last years, posing a multiplicity of challenges to the pure and traditional procedural doctrine, to the rights traditionally assured to the procedural actors, being important to question if the (even more) organized criminality and the transnational and technological methods of crime did not shift the center of the confrontation between the efficient administration of justice and the rights of the accused. The Portuguese Republic is no exception: without a legislative framework explicitly guarantying a way to benefit those who collaborate with Justice, one must first question if the Criminal Procedural Code allows or may allow criminal Justice negotiated solutions; we will analyze some foreseen legal solutions of consensualism, not forgeting the Portuguese doctrine and courts decisions.As ideias de consenso e celeridade processual enformam os Direitos processuais penais dos países democráticos cada vez com maior premência. Soluções de Justiça criminal negociada têm-se multiplicado nos anos mais recentes, colocando uma ampla gama de desafios à pura e tradicional doutrina processualista pura, aos tradicionais direitos dos intervenientes processuais, questionando-se se a profusão da criminalidade (cada vez mais) organizada e os métodos tecnológicos e transnacionais do iter criminis não alteraram o centro da dialética tensão administração eficiente da Justiça/direitos dos Arguidos. Portugal não é exceção: sem um enquadramento legislativo consagrando expressamente um sistema de colaboração premiada, mister é questionar se o Código do Processo Penal admite ou poderá admitir soluções negociadas de Justiça criminal; analisaremos algumas soluções de consensualismo legalmente consagradas, sem deixar de lado a análise da dogmática e jurisprudência lusas.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/3910.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.39Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 71-102Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 71-102Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 71-102Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 71-1022525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39/53Copyright (c) 2017 André Ferreira de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira de Oliveira, André2017-06-08T17:40:57Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/39Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T17:40:57Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? Soluções negociadas de justiça penal no direito português: uma realidade atual numa galáxia distante? |
title |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? |
spellingShingle |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? Ferreira de Oliveira, André Negotiated Criminal Justice Portuguese Criminal Procedure Law Consensus. Justiça Penal negociada Processo Penal português Consenso. |
title_short |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? |
title_full |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? |
title_fullStr |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? |
title_sort |
Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy? |
author |
Ferreira de Oliveira, André |
author_facet |
Ferreira de Oliveira, André |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira de Oliveira, André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Negotiated Criminal Justice Portuguese Criminal Procedure Law Consensus. Justiça Penal negociada Processo Penal português Consenso. |
topic |
Negotiated Criminal Justice Portuguese Criminal Procedure Law Consensus. Justiça Penal negociada Processo Penal português Consenso. |
description |
The ideas of procedural consensus and celerity increasingly shape the Criminal Procedural Law of Democratic countries. Negotiated criminal justice solutions have been multiplying in the last years, posing a multiplicity of challenges to the pure and traditional procedural doctrine, to the rights traditionally assured to the procedural actors, being important to question if the (even more) organized criminality and the transnational and technological methods of crime did not shift the center of the confrontation between the efficient administration of justice and the rights of the accused. The Portuguese Republic is no exception: without a legislative framework explicitly guarantying a way to benefit those who collaborate with Justice, one must first question if the Criminal Procedural Code allows or may allow criminal Justice negotiated solutions; we will analyze some foreseen legal solutions of consensualism, not forgeting the Portuguese doctrine and courts decisions. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.39 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.39 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39/53 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 André Ferreira de Oliveira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 André Ferreira de Oliveira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 71-102 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 71-102 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 71-102 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 71-102 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939871367168 |