Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira de Oliveira, André
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39
Resumo: The ideas of procedural consensus and celerity increasingly shape the Criminal Procedural Law of Democratic countries. Negotiated criminal justice solutions have been multiplying in the last years, posing a multiplicity of challenges to the pure and traditional procedural doctrine, to the rights traditionally assured to the procedural actors, being important to question if the (even more) organized criminality and the transnational and technological methods of crime did not shift the center of the confrontation between the efficient administration of justice and the rights of the accused. The Portuguese Republic is no exception: without a legislative framework explicitly guarantying a way to benefit those who collaborate with Justice, one must first question if the Criminal Procedural Code allows or may allow criminal Justice negotiated solutions; we will analyze some foreseen legal solutions of consensualism, not forgeting the Portuguese doctrine and courts decisions.
id IBRASPP-1_749c2d22a076db472c35c7dbb78c3472
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/39
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?Soluções negociadas de justiça penal no direito português: uma realidade atual numa galáxia distante?Negotiated Criminal JusticePortuguese Criminal Procedure LawConsensus.Justiça Penal negociadaProcesso Penal portuguêsConsenso.The ideas of procedural consensus and celerity increasingly shape the Criminal Procedural Law of Democratic countries. Negotiated criminal justice solutions have been multiplying in the last years, posing a multiplicity of challenges to the pure and traditional procedural doctrine, to the rights traditionally assured to the procedural actors, being important to question if the (even more) organized criminality and the transnational and technological methods of crime did not shift the center of the confrontation between the efficient administration of justice and the rights of the accused. The Portuguese Republic is no exception: without a legislative framework explicitly guarantying a way to benefit those who collaborate with Justice, one must first question if the Criminal Procedural Code allows or may allow criminal Justice negotiated solutions; we will analyze some foreseen legal solutions of consensualism, not forgeting the Portuguese doctrine and courts decisions.As ideias de consenso e celeridade processual enformam os Direitos processuais penais dos países democráticos cada vez com maior premência. Soluções de Justiça criminal negociada têm-se multiplicado nos anos mais recentes, colocando uma ampla gama de desafios à pura e tradicional doutrina processualista pura, aos tradicionais direitos dos intervenientes processuais, questionando-se se a profusão da criminalidade (cada vez mais) organizada e os métodos tecnológicos e transnacionais do iter criminis não alteraram o centro da dialética tensão administração eficiente da Justiça/direitos dos Arguidos. Portugal não é exceção: sem um enquadramento legislativo consagrando expressamente um sistema de colaboração premiada, mister é questionar se o Código do Processo Penal admite ou poderá admitir soluções negociadas de Justiça criminal; analisaremos algumas soluções de consensualismo legalmente consagradas, sem deixar de lado a análise da dogmática e jurisprudência lusas.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/3910.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.39Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 71-102Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 71-102Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 71-102Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 71-1022525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39/53Copyright (c) 2017 André Ferreira de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira de Oliveira, André2017-06-08T17:40:57Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/39Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T17:40:57Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
Soluções negociadas de justiça penal no direito português: uma realidade atual numa galáxia distante?
title Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
spellingShingle Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
Ferreira de Oliveira, André
Negotiated Criminal Justice
Portuguese Criminal Procedure Law
Consensus.
Justiça Penal negociada
Processo Penal português
Consenso.
title_short Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
title_full Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
title_fullStr Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
title_full_unstemmed Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
title_sort Negotiated Crime Solutions in Portuguese Law: A nowadays reality in a far-away galaxy?
author Ferreira de Oliveira, André
author_facet Ferreira de Oliveira, André
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira de Oliveira, André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Negotiated Criminal Justice
Portuguese Criminal Procedure Law
Consensus.
Justiça Penal negociada
Processo Penal português
Consenso.
topic Negotiated Criminal Justice
Portuguese Criminal Procedure Law
Consensus.
Justiça Penal negociada
Processo Penal português
Consenso.
description The ideas of procedural consensus and celerity increasingly shape the Criminal Procedural Law of Democratic countries. Negotiated criminal justice solutions have been multiplying in the last years, posing a multiplicity of challenges to the pure and traditional procedural doctrine, to the rights traditionally assured to the procedural actors, being important to question if the (even more) organized criminality and the transnational and technological methods of crime did not shift the center of the confrontation between the efficient administration of justice and the rights of the accused. The Portuguese Republic is no exception: without a legislative framework explicitly guarantying a way to benefit those who collaborate with Justice, one must first question if the Criminal Procedural Code allows or may allow criminal Justice negotiated solutions; we will analyze some foreseen legal solutions of consensualism, not forgeting the Portuguese doctrine and courts decisions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.39
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.39
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/39/53
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 André Ferreira de Oliveira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 André Ferreira de Oliveira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 71-102
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 71-102
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 71-102
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 71-102
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939871367168