I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dantas, Maria Leuziedna
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Sayonara Abrantes de, de Sousa, Maria Rosaly, Lacerda, Priscila Tavares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online)
Texto Completo: https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953
Resumo: This article is the result of a project linked to the Institutional Program of Scientific Initiation Scholarships for Higher Education (PIBIC-EM). The program’s objective was to analyze the contributing factors for the process of reading literacy training in order to verify how young people make their choices of literary texts, as well as know the difficulties and facilities they face in contact with these genres. To do so, we used the quantitative qualitative research through the application of a questionnaire, consisting of open questions, and applied to the students of the Integrated in Information Technology and Integrated Technician in the Environment of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB)/campus Sousa courses. We also analyzed the perceptions derived from the observations of the Reader Club of the same campus, in an attempt to verify how the intervention of activities that mediate literary literacy favors the stimulus to the reading formation. Based on the data analysis, we observed that the student's distance element from reading is the lack of incentive, that is, the construction of an atmosphere that surrounds him, both in the classroom and in the other environments that welcome him. To overcome this, it is necessary for the teacher to have a theoretical-methodological apparatus guiding in his classes, since mediation favors literary literacy, having as support the Receptional Method and a conception of reading that articulates the interactional to the discursive, helping in the organization and selection of texts, in order to achieve the objectives of the formation of the reader.
id IFFlu_a2d511ff9488febf588c1dc993c515cd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.editoraessentia.iff.edu.br:article/6953
network_acronym_str IFFlu
network_name_str Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacyEu leio. Você lê? Desafios e possibilidades no trabalho com o letramento literárioReadingMediationLiterature literacyLeituraMediaçãoLetramento literárioThis article is the result of a project linked to the Institutional Program of Scientific Initiation Scholarships for Higher Education (PIBIC-EM). The program’s objective was to analyze the contributing factors for the process of reading literacy training in order to verify how young people make their choices of literary texts, as well as know the difficulties and facilities they face in contact with these genres. To do so, we used the quantitative qualitative research through the application of a questionnaire, consisting of open questions, and applied to the students of the Integrated in Information Technology and Integrated Technician in the Environment of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB)/campus Sousa courses. We also analyzed the perceptions derived from the observations of the Reader Club of the same campus, in an attempt to verify how the intervention of activities that mediate literary literacy favors the stimulus to the reading formation. Based on the data analysis, we observed that the student's distance element from reading is the lack of incentive, that is, the construction of an atmosphere that surrounds him, both in the classroom and in the other environments that welcome him. To overcome this, it is necessary for the teacher to have a theoretical-methodological apparatus guiding in his classes, since mediation favors literary literacy, having as support the Receptional Method and a conception of reading that articulates the interactional to the discursive, helping in the organization and selection of texts, in order to achieve the objectives of the formation of the reader.Este artigo é resultante de um projeto vinculado ao Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação Científica para o Ensino Médio (PIBIC-EM), que teve como objetivo analisar os fatores contribuintes para o processo de formação leitora do texto literário, a fim de verificar como os jovens fazem suas escolhas de textos literários, bem como conhecer as dificuldades e facilidades que enfrentam em contato com esses gêneros. Para tanto, utilizamos a pesquisa quantiqualitativa por meio da aplicação de questionário constituído de perguntas abertas e aplicado com os alunos dos cursos Técnico Integrado em Informática e Técnico Integrado em Meio Ambiente do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB)/campus Sousa. Analisamos também as percepções advindas das observações do Clube Leitor do mesmo campus, na tentativa de verificar de que forma a intervenção de atividades que medeiam o letramento literário favorecem o estímulo à formação leitora. Com base na análise de dados, observamos que o elemento que distancia o aluno da leitura é a falta de incentivo, ou seja, da construção de uma atmosfera que o envolva, tanto na sala de aula, quanto nos demais ambientes que o acolhem. Para superar isso, faz-se necessário que o professor possua um aparato teórico-metodológico norteador em suas aulas, uma vez que a mediação favorece o letramento literário, tendo como suporte o Método Recepcional e uma concepção de leitura que articulam o interacional ao discursivo, auxiliando na organização e na seleção de textos, de modo a alcançar os objetivos da formação do leitor.  Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Fluminense2017-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/ziptext/htmlhttps://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/695310.19180/1809-2667.v19n12017p59-75Revista Vértices; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2017): Jan./Apr.; 59-75Revista Vértices; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2017): ene./abr.; 59-75Revista Vértices; v. 19 n. 1 (2017): jan./abr.; 59-751809-26671415-2843reponame:Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online)instname:Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Campos dos Goytacazesinstacron:IFFluminenseporhttps://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953/7190https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953/14568https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953/14569Dantas, Maria LeuziednaOliveira, Sayonara Abrantes dede Sousa, Maria RosalyLacerda, Priscila Tavaresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-01-03T08:35:19Zoai:ojs.editoraessentia.iff.edu.br:article/6953Revistahttps://essentiaeditora.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/PUBhttps://essentiaeditora.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/oaiessentia@iff.edu.br1809-26671415-2843opendoar:2022-01-03T08:35:19Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online) - Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Campos dos Goytacazesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
Eu leio. Você lê? Desafios e possibilidades no trabalho com o letramento literário
title I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
spellingShingle I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
Dantas, Maria Leuziedna
Reading
Mediation
Literature literacy
Leitura
Mediação
Letramento literário
title_short I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
title_full I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
title_fullStr I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
title_full_unstemmed I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
title_sort I read. You read? Challenges and possibilities in working with literary literacy
author Dantas, Maria Leuziedna
author_facet Dantas, Maria Leuziedna
Oliveira, Sayonara Abrantes de
de Sousa, Maria Rosaly
Lacerda, Priscila Tavares
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Sayonara Abrantes de
de Sousa, Maria Rosaly
Lacerda, Priscila Tavares
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dantas, Maria Leuziedna
Oliveira, Sayonara Abrantes de
de Sousa, Maria Rosaly
Lacerda, Priscila Tavares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reading
Mediation
Literature literacy
Leitura
Mediação
Letramento literário
topic Reading
Mediation
Literature literacy
Leitura
Mediação
Letramento literário
description This article is the result of a project linked to the Institutional Program of Scientific Initiation Scholarships for Higher Education (PIBIC-EM). The program’s objective was to analyze the contributing factors for the process of reading literacy training in order to verify how young people make their choices of literary texts, as well as know the difficulties and facilities they face in contact with these genres. To do so, we used the quantitative qualitative research through the application of a questionnaire, consisting of open questions, and applied to the students of the Integrated in Information Technology and Integrated Technician in the Environment of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB)/campus Sousa courses. We also analyzed the perceptions derived from the observations of the Reader Club of the same campus, in an attempt to verify how the intervention of activities that mediate literary literacy favors the stimulus to the reading formation. Based on the data analysis, we observed that the student's distance element from reading is the lack of incentive, that is, the construction of an atmosphere that surrounds him, both in the classroom and in the other environments that welcome him. To overcome this, it is necessary for the teacher to have a theoretical-methodological apparatus guiding in his classes, since mediation favors literary literacy, having as support the Receptional Method and a conception of reading that articulates the interactional to the discursive, helping in the organization and selection of texts, in order to achieve the objectives of the formation of the reader.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953
10.19180/1809-2667.v19n12017p59-75
url https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953
identifier_str_mv 10.19180/1809-2667.v19n12017p59-75
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953/7190
https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953/14568
https://editoraessentia.iff.edu.br/index.php/vertices/article/view/6953/14569
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/zip
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Vértices; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2017): Jan./Apr.; 59-75
Revista Vértices; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2017): ene./abr.; 59-75
Revista Vértices; v. 19 n. 1 (2017): jan./abr.; 59-75
1809-2667
1415-2843
reponame:Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online)
instname:Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Campos dos Goytacazes
instacron:IFFluminense
instname_str Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Campos dos Goytacazes
instacron_str IFFluminense
institution IFFluminense
reponame_str Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online)
collection Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vértices (Campos dos Goitacazes. Online) - Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Campos dos Goytacazes
repository.mail.fl_str_mv essentia@iff.edu.br
_version_ 1797077561699729408