Ação rescisória por violação à literal disposição de lei (Art. 485, V, CPC)

• Autor(a) principal: Aburto, Carla Cesar
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/33573
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL; Literal disposição de lei; Violação; Norma jurídica; Coisa julgada material; Súmula 343; Relativização; Literal disposition of the law; Violation; Legal norm; Res Judicata; Precedent 343; Relativization

The constitutional protection of the res judicata doesn’t prevent the Law to dictate a set of rules for its rescission by jurisdiction activities. The law cannot undo (rescind, overrule or to neutralize its effects) the res judicata, but it can predict lawfully, as it did in art. 485 of the Code of Civil Procedure, its rescindment by rescissory action. Starting from this observation, this work intends to study the polemic aspects of the rescissory action guided in art. 485, section V, of CPC, also known as rescissory action by violation to literal disposition of the law. Therefore, historical notions are drawn about the origin and the evolution of the institute, that are proved to be crucial for the comprehension of the current legislative treatment of the matter. Special attention is given in the differencing of the rescissory action and other contesting terms, just like its general aspects, such as, juridical nature, suitability, admissibility of assumptions, legitimacy and competency. Then, the concepts of “literal disposition of the law” and the “violation” are analyzed in the light of doctrine and jurisprudence, entering to the theme peculiarities, highlighting the cases of violation of the legal principle, binding precedent, to the costume, to the contractual clause and its analogy. It is studied the possibility of filing of rescissory action to deconstruct legal decision based on a norm later understood as institutional or constitutional by the STF, besides the application of the Precedent 343 of the STF. Lastly, the work deals with the institutes of the res judicata and the rescissory action under the light of the Law no 13.105, of March 16, 2015 (new CPC)