Estado de coisas inconstitucional e a sistemática violação aos direitos fundamentais dos encarcerados

• Autor(a) principal: Paolera, Caio Della
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_SP
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/33525
• topic: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL; Omissão; Inconstitucional; Estado de coisas inconstitucional; Sistema Penitenciário Nacional; Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 347; Omission; Unconstitutional; Unconstitutional state of things; National Penitentiary System; Claim of Non-compliance with a Fundamental Precept (ADPF) 347

This paper aims to offer the theoretical foundations of the technique of decision of the unconstitutional state of things, whose origin goes back to the trial of the Colombian Constitutional Court. The judicial activism of the Court was crucial for the development and promotion of fundamental rights for those who were imprisoned by the state. The development of the Colombian jurisprudence was responsible for the creation of mechanisms for monitoring decisions, what actually contributes to the advancement and improvement of conditions faced by prisoners. In Brazil, the Federal Supreme Court has recognized, as a precautionary measure, in the trial of ADPF nº 347/DF the application of unconstitutional state of things, because of the massive and systematic violations of the fundamental rights of prisoners locked in the the brazilian prison system. In addition, the ministers of the Supreme Court reaffirmed the incapacity of public authority to adopt measures to resolve the conflict based on a joint action of various public bodies.