Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i3.20058 |
Resumo: | Several strategies have been proposed to fill the gaps in the pedagogical training of faculty, one of which referring to peer observation of teaching. To support faculty in their pedagogical practices, a peer observation of teaching program is currently being implemented at University of Aveiro (Portugal), already in its second edition. In the present paper, after briefly framing the concept of teaching professionalism in the specific context of Higher Education, we describe POP – Programa de Observação por Pares and analyze the reflections of 10 professors about their own pedagogical practices in Higher Education. They participated in the first edition of this program and met to reflect about it. This meeting was video recorded and the professors’ testimonies were transcribed. Their perceptions about the experience of participating in POP and about other dimensions related to teaching professionalism in Higher Education were analyzed using the content analysis technique (specifically, thematic analysis), which was implemented with WebQDA, a qualitative data analysis software. In this paper, we present the common themes that have emerged from this analysis, namely: the reasons that motivated the participation in POP; the advantages and limitations of participating in POP; the future potentialities of a program like POP. Among other considerations on the relevance of peer observation for professional development, we reflect on answers to the question about the role of professors in Higher Education: is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? |
id |
RCAP_260155a7b31173717115d10eeed12c72 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/20058 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program“Só para ensinar” ou “mais para aprender”? Reflexões, entre pares, sobre as (próprias) práticas pedagógicas no ensino superior: Análise das perceções dos professores sobre um programa de observação por paresSeveral strategies have been proposed to fill the gaps in the pedagogical training of faculty, one of which referring to peer observation of teaching. To support faculty in their pedagogical practices, a peer observation of teaching program is currently being implemented at University of Aveiro (Portugal), already in its second edition. In the present paper, after briefly framing the concept of teaching professionalism in the specific context of Higher Education, we describe POP – Programa de Observação por Pares and analyze the reflections of 10 professors about their own pedagogical practices in Higher Education. They participated in the first edition of this program and met to reflect about it. This meeting was video recorded and the professors’ testimonies were transcribed. Their perceptions about the experience of participating in POP and about other dimensions related to teaching professionalism in Higher Education were analyzed using the content analysis technique (specifically, thematic analysis), which was implemented with WebQDA, a qualitative data analysis software. In this paper, we present the common themes that have emerged from this analysis, namely: the reasons that motivated the participation in POP; the advantages and limitations of participating in POP; the future potentialities of a program like POP. Among other considerations on the relevance of peer observation for professional development, we reflect on answers to the question about the role of professors in Higher Education: is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Varias estrategias son avanzadas para suplir vacíos en la formación pedagógica de profesores de la Enseñanza Superior, una de ellas la observación entre pares. Para apoyar los profesores en sus prácticas pedagógicas, está implementándose en la Universidad de Aveiro (Portugal) un programa de observación entre pares (su segunda edición). En el presente artículo, después de un breve encuadramiento aludiendo a la profesionalidad docente en el contexto específico de la Enseñanza Superior, describimos el POP – Programa de Observación entre Pares y se analizan las reflexiones sobre las (propias) prácticas pedagógicas en la Enseñanza Superior de 10 profesores que participaron en la primera edición de este programa y que se reunieron en un encuentro para reflexionar sobre lo mismo. Esto fue vídeogravado y los testimonios de cada profesor transcritos. Sus percepciones sobre la experiencia de participación en el POP y otras dimensiones asociadas a la profesionalidad docente en la Enseñanza Superior fueron analizadas mediante la técnica de análisis de contenido (específicamente, el análisis temático), empleado con el software de análisis de datos cualitativos WebQDA. De esto análisis aquí presentada, emergieron temas comunes: las razones que motivaran la participación en el POP; las ventajas y las limitaciones de la participación; las potencialidades futuras de este programa. Entre otras consideraciones sobre la pertinencia de la observación entre pares en el cuadro de la formación continuada de profesores de la Enseñanza Superior, se ponderan respuestas a la pregunta sobre el papel del profesor en la Enseñanza Superior: ¿será “solamente para enseñar” o “más para aprender”? Várias estratégias têm sido avançadas para suprir lacunas na formação pedagógica de professores do Ensino Superior, sendo uma delas a observação por pares. Com o intuito de apoiar os professores nas suas práticas pedagógicas, está em curso na Universidade de Aveiro (Portugal) um programa de observação por pares, já na sua segunda edição. No presente artigo, após um breve enquadramento aludindo à profissionalidade docente no contexto específico do Ensino Superior, descreve-se o POP – Programa de Observação por Pares e analisam-se as reflexões sobre as (próprias) práticas pedagógicas no Ensino Superior de 10 professores que participaram na primeira edição deste programa e que se reuniram num encontro conjunto para reflexão sobre o mesmo. Este encontro foi videogravado e os testemunhos de cada professor foram transcritos. As suas perceções, não apenas sobre a experiência de participação no POP, mas também sobre outras dimensões ligadas à profissionalidade docente no Ensino Superior, foram analisadas mediante a técnica da análise de conteúdo (especificamente, a análise temática), implementada com recurso ao WebQDA, um software de análise de dados qualitativos. Desta análise, apresentada no presente artigo, emergiram temas comuns: as razões que motivaram a participação no POP; as vantagens da participação no POP e as suas limitações; as potencialidades futuras de um programa como o POP. Entre outras considerações acerca da pertinência da observação por pares no quadro da formação continuada de professores do Ensino Superior, ponderam-se respostas à pergunta sobre o papel do professor no Ensino Superior: será “só para ensinar” ou “mais para aprender”? Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2020-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i3.20058https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i3.20058Indagatio Didactica; Vol 12 No 3 (2020); 123-140Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2020); 123-140Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 No 3 (2020); 123-140Indagatio Didactica; vol. 12 n.º 3 (2020); 123-1401647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/20058https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/20058/14562Franco, AmandaVieira, Rui MarquesSimões, Ana RaquelCosta, AlbertoVentura, Sónia P. M.Neto, VictorCarlos, VâniaLopes, Betina SilvaRosa, Maria JoãoFonseca, PedroSilva, Vera L. M.Lima, MárioValente, Roberttinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-22T10:18:44Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/20058Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:25.604311Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program “Só para ensinar” ou “mais para aprender”? Reflexões, entre pares, sobre as (próprias) práticas pedagógicas no ensino superior: Análise das perceções dos professores sobre um programa de observação por pares |
title |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program |
spellingShingle |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program Franco, Amanda |
title_short |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program |
title_full |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program |
title_fullStr |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program |
title_sort |
Is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? Reflections, among peers, about (their own) pedagogical practices in higher education: Analysis of teachers’ perceptions about a peer observation of teaching program |
author |
Franco, Amanda |
author_facet |
Franco, Amanda Vieira, Rui Marques Simões, Ana Raquel Costa, Alberto Ventura, Sónia P. M. Neto, Victor Carlos, Vânia Lopes, Betina Silva Rosa, Maria João Fonseca, Pedro Silva, Vera L. M. Lima, Mário Valente, Robertt |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Rui Marques Simões, Ana Raquel Costa, Alberto Ventura, Sónia P. M. Neto, Victor Carlos, Vânia Lopes, Betina Silva Rosa, Maria João Fonseca, Pedro Silva, Vera L. M. Lima, Mário Valente, Robertt |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Franco, Amanda Vieira, Rui Marques Simões, Ana Raquel Costa, Alberto Ventura, Sónia P. M. Neto, Victor Carlos, Vânia Lopes, Betina Silva Rosa, Maria João Fonseca, Pedro Silva, Vera L. M. Lima, Mário Valente, Robertt |
description |
Several strategies have been proposed to fill the gaps in the pedagogical training of faculty, one of which referring to peer observation of teaching. To support faculty in their pedagogical practices, a peer observation of teaching program is currently being implemented at University of Aveiro (Portugal), already in its second edition. In the present paper, after briefly framing the concept of teaching professionalism in the specific context of Higher Education, we describe POP – Programa de Observação por Pares and analyze the reflections of 10 professors about their own pedagogical practices in Higher Education. They participated in the first edition of this program and met to reflect about it. This meeting was video recorded and the professors’ testimonies were transcribed. Their perceptions about the experience of participating in POP and about other dimensions related to teaching professionalism in Higher Education were analyzed using the content analysis technique (specifically, thematic analysis), which was implemented with WebQDA, a qualitative data analysis software. In this paper, we present the common themes that have emerged from this analysis, namely: the reasons that motivated the participation in POP; the advantages and limitations of participating in POP; the future potentialities of a program like POP. Among other considerations on the relevance of peer observation for professional development, we reflect on answers to the question about the role of professors in Higher Education: is it “just to teach” or is it “more to learn”? |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i3.20058 https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i3.20058 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i3.20058 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/20058 https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/20058/14562 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Indagatio Didactica; Vol 12 No 3 (2020); 123-140 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2020); 123-140 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 No 3 (2020); 123-140 Indagatio Didactica; vol. 12 n.º 3 (2020); 123-140 1647-3582 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133572327538688 |