Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado Sorgi, Amanda
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bellinetti, Luiz Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44988
Resumo: Law 13.467/17 introduced restrictions to the human and fundamental right of access to the Labor Court in the CLT. Such restrictions conflict with the provisions of art. 5, XXXV and LXXIV of the Federal Constitution, hinder the effectiveness of constitutional and infra-constitutional labor rights and break the social guarantee of work. For these reasons, the STF judged, in October 2021, ADI 5766/DF, declaring the articles art. 790-B, caput and §4 and art. 791-A, §4 of the CLT Reformed. However, the declaration of unconstitutionality does not put an end to issues involving access to the Labor Court, leaving challenges between the worker and the labor judiciary. These challenges are represented by other restrictive provisions, which remain in force; by the numbers of the Labor Court, which point to a situation of contained litigation and the possibility of new restrictions. Qualitative and deductive research methods were used, through literature review and analysis of data released by the TST.
id UEL-6_36900ebc345e7e35e1c0c468d420362e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44988
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justiceRestrições ao acesso à Justiça do Trabalho na lei 13.467/17: o julgamento da ADI 5766/DF e os desafios que permanecem entre o trabalhador e o acesso à justiçaAcesso à justiça. Lei 13.467/17. Restrições. ADI 5766/DF. Desafios.Access to justiceLaw 13.467/17RestrictionsADI 5766/DFChallengesLaw 13.467/17 introduced restrictions to the human and fundamental right of access to the Labor Court in the CLT. Such restrictions conflict with the provisions of art. 5, XXXV and LXXIV of the Federal Constitution, hinder the effectiveness of constitutional and infra-constitutional labor rights and break the social guarantee of work. For these reasons, the STF judged, in October 2021, ADI 5766/DF, declaring the articles art. 790-B, caput and §4 and art. 791-A, §4 of the CLT Reformed. However, the declaration of unconstitutionality does not put an end to issues involving access to the Labor Court, leaving challenges between the worker and the labor judiciary. These challenges are represented by other restrictive provisions, which remain in force; by the numbers of the Labor Court, which point to a situation of contained litigation and the possibility of new restrictions. Qualitative and deductive research methods were used, through literature review and analysis of data released by the TST.A Lei 13.467/17 introduziu na CLT restrições ao direito humano e fundamental de acesso à Justiça do Trabalho. Tais restrições conflitam com as previsões do art. 5º, XXXV e LXXIV da CF, dificultam a efetividade dos direitos constitucionais e infraconstitucionais do trabalho e rompem com a garantia social do trabalho. Por essas razões, o STF julgou, em outubro de 2021, a ADI 5766/DF, declarando inconstitucionais os artigos art. 790-B, caput e §4º e art. 791-A, §4º da CLT Reformada. Todavia, a declaração de inconstitucionalidade emanada do STF não põe termo às questões envolvendo o acesso à Justiça do Trabalho, deixando ainda desafios entre o trabalhador e o Judiciário trabalhista. Esses desafios são representados pelos demais dispositivos restritivos, que permanecem vigentes; pelos números da Justiça do Trabalho, que apontam para uma situação de litigiosidade contida e pela possibilidade de novas restrições. Foram utilizados os métodos qualitativo e dedutivo de pesquisa, mediante revisão bibliográfica e análise de dados divulgados pelo TST.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4498810.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p51-72Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 51-722178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44988/48341Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado Sorgi, AmandaBellinetti, Luiz Fernando2023-01-13T13:45:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44988Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-13T13:45:16Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
Restrições ao acesso à Justiça do Trabalho na lei 13.467/17: o julgamento da ADI 5766/DF e os desafios que permanecem entre o trabalhador e o acesso à justiça
title Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
spellingShingle Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
Machado Sorgi, Amanda
Acesso à justiça. Lei 13.467/17. Restrições. ADI 5766/DF. Desafios.
Access to justice
Law 13.467/17
Restrictions
ADI 5766/DF
Challenges
title_short Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
title_full Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
title_fullStr Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
title_full_unstemmed Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
title_sort Restrictions on access to labor justice in law 13.467/17: the judgment of ADI 5766/DF and the challenges that remain between the worker and access to justice
author Machado Sorgi, Amanda
author_facet Machado Sorgi, Amanda
Bellinetti, Luiz Fernando
author_role author
author2 Bellinetti, Luiz Fernando
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado Sorgi, Amanda
Bellinetti, Luiz Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acesso à justiça. Lei 13.467/17. Restrições. ADI 5766/DF. Desafios.
Access to justice
Law 13.467/17
Restrictions
ADI 5766/DF
Challenges
topic Acesso à justiça. Lei 13.467/17. Restrições. ADI 5766/DF. Desafios.
Access to justice
Law 13.467/17
Restrictions
ADI 5766/DF
Challenges
description Law 13.467/17 introduced restrictions to the human and fundamental right of access to the Labor Court in the CLT. Such restrictions conflict with the provisions of art. 5, XXXV and LXXIV of the Federal Constitution, hinder the effectiveness of constitutional and infra-constitutional labor rights and break the social guarantee of work. For these reasons, the STF judged, in October 2021, ADI 5766/DF, declaring the articles art. 790-B, caput and §4 and art. 791-A, §4 of the CLT Reformed. However, the declaration of unconstitutionality does not put an end to issues involving access to the Labor Court, leaving challenges between the worker and the labor judiciary. These challenges are represented by other restrictive provisions, which remain in force; by the numbers of the Labor Court, which point to a situation of contained litigation and the possibility of new restrictions. Qualitative and deductive research methods were used, through literature review and analysis of data released by the TST.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44988
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p51-72
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44988
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p51-72
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44988/48341
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 51-72
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016248037376

Registros relacionados