The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583 |
Resumo: | The paper problematizes the suitability of the generalclause of boni mores in view of the current conformation ofBrazilian legal order. In Roman-German matrix systems, the bonimores are traditionally used as a limitation to private autonomy.This guideline is reflected in several restrictive provisions of theCivil Code of 2002. In Brazil, however, the legal, doctrinal andjurisprudential treatment of the boni mores has been marked bythe absence of objective demarcations. In general, its applicationis based on social morality and is focused predominantly on thecontrol of sexual and family living. In this sense, the use of bonimores evinces a homogenizing and unjustified imposition ofthe model of good life defended by the majority groups. Thisreality contradicts the legal recognition of pluralism and laicityas important democratic vectors. In addition, it can be notedthat the ends sought by the boni mores could be satisfactorilyreached through other institutes with more solid dogmatic bases,such as the objective good faith and the public order. In thiscontext, through a theoretical investigation of juridical-dogmaticstrand and comprehensive-propositional type, it is concluded bythe unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores in thecontemporary society. |
id |
UEL-6_73119298119bb8dc10c7cafa4bd810e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37583 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary societyA insustentabilidade da cláusula geral de bons costumes: pluralismo e laicidade na sociedade contemporâneaoBons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais.Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses.The paper problematizes the suitability of the generalclause of boni mores in view of the current conformation ofBrazilian legal order. In Roman-German matrix systems, the bonimores are traditionally used as a limitation to private autonomy.This guideline is reflected in several restrictive provisions of theCivil Code of 2002. In Brazil, however, the legal, doctrinal andjurisprudential treatment of the boni mores has been marked bythe absence of objective demarcations. In general, its applicationis based on social morality and is focused predominantly on thecontrol of sexual and family living. In this sense, the use of bonimores evinces a homogenizing and unjustified imposition ofthe model of good life defended by the majority groups. Thisreality contradicts the legal recognition of pluralism and laicityas important democratic vectors. In addition, it can be notedthat the ends sought by the boni mores could be satisfactorilyreached through other institutes with more solid dogmatic bases,such as the objective good faith and the public order. In thiscontext, through a theoretical investigation of juridical-dogmaticstrand and comprehensive-propositional type, it is concluded bythe unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores in thecontemporary society.O artigo problematiza a adequabilidade da cláusula geral dos bons costumes à conformação atual do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Nos sistemas de matriz romano-germânica, os bons costumes são tradicionalmente utilizados como limitação à autonomia privada. Trata-se de orientação refletida em diversos dispositivos restritivos do Código Civil de 2002. No Brasil, contudo, o tratamento legal, doutrinário e jurisprudencial dos bons costumes tem sido marcado pela ausência de demarcações objetivas. Em geral, observa-se uma aplicação fundamentada na moral social e voltada preponderantemente para o controle de vivências sexuais e familiares. Nesse sentido, o uso dos bons costumes evidencia uma imposição homogeneizante e injustificada do modelo de vida boa defendido pelos grupos majoritários. Essa realidade contraria o reconhecimento jurídico do pluralismo e da laicidade enquanto importantes vetores democráticos. Ademais, percebe-se que os fins almejados pelos bons costumes poderiam ser atingidos satisfatoriamente por meio de outros institutos com bases dogmáticas mais sólidas, como a boa-fé objetiva e a ordem pública. Nesse contexto, mediante uma investigação teórica, de vertente jurídico-dogmática e tipo compreensivo-propositivo, conclui-se pela insustentabilidade da cláusula geral dos bons costumes na sociedade contemporânea.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3758310.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p175Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 162-1752178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583/48395Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Fabio QueirozLara, Mariana AlvesAndrade, Daniel de Pádua2023-01-26T16:56:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37583Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T16:56:33Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society A insustentabilidade da cláusula geral de bons costumes: pluralismo e laicidade na sociedade contemporâneao |
title |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society |
spellingShingle |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society Pereira, Fabio Queiroz Bons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais. Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses. |
title_short |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society |
title_full |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society |
title_fullStr |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society |
title_full_unstemmed |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society |
title_sort |
The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society |
author |
Pereira, Fabio Queiroz |
author_facet |
Pereira, Fabio Queiroz Lara, Mariana Alves Andrade, Daniel de Pádua |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lara, Mariana Alves Andrade, Daniel de Pádua |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Fabio Queiroz Lara, Mariana Alves Andrade, Daniel de Pádua |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais. Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses. |
topic |
Bons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais. Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses. |
description |
The paper problematizes the suitability of the generalclause of boni mores in view of the current conformation ofBrazilian legal order. In Roman-German matrix systems, the bonimores are traditionally used as a limitation to private autonomy.This guideline is reflected in several restrictive provisions of theCivil Code of 2002. In Brazil, however, the legal, doctrinal andjurisprudential treatment of the boni mores has been marked bythe absence of objective demarcations. In general, its applicationis based on social morality and is focused predominantly on thecontrol of sexual and family living. In this sense, the use of bonimores evinces a homogenizing and unjustified imposition ofthe model of good life defended by the majority groups. Thisreality contradicts the legal recognition of pluralism and laicityas important democratic vectors. In addition, it can be notedthat the ends sought by the boni mores could be satisfactorilyreached through other institutes with more solid dogmatic bases,such as the objective good faith and the public order. In thiscontext, through a theoretical investigation of juridical-dogmaticstrand and comprehensive-propositional type, it is concluded bythe unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores in thecontemporary society. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p175 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p175 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583/48395 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 162-175 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015601065984 |