The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lara, Mariana Alves, Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583
Resumo: The paper problematizes the suitability of the generalclause of boni mores in view of the current conformation ofBrazilian legal order. In Roman-German matrix systems, the bonimores are traditionally used as a limitation to private autonomy.This guideline is reflected in several restrictive provisions of theCivil Code of 2002. In Brazil, however, the legal, doctrinal andjurisprudential treatment of the boni mores has been marked bythe absence of objective demarcations. In general, its applicationis based on social morality and is focused predominantly on thecontrol of sexual and family living. In this sense, the use of bonimores evinces a homogenizing and unjustified imposition ofthe model of good life defended by the majority groups. Thisreality contradicts the legal recognition of pluralism and laicityas important democratic vectors. In addition, it can be notedthat the ends sought by the boni mores could be satisfactorilyreached through other institutes with more solid dogmatic bases,such as the objective good faith and the public order. In thiscontext, through a theoretical investigation of juridical-dogmaticstrand and comprehensive-propositional type, it is concluded bythe unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores in thecontemporary society.
id UEL-6_73119298119bb8dc10c7cafa4bd810e7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37583
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary societyA insustentabilidade da cláusula geral de bons costumes: pluralismo e laicidade na sociedade contemporâneaoBons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais.Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses.The paper problematizes the suitability of the generalclause of boni mores in view of the current conformation ofBrazilian legal order. In Roman-German matrix systems, the bonimores are traditionally used as a limitation to private autonomy.This guideline is reflected in several restrictive provisions of theCivil Code of 2002. In Brazil, however, the legal, doctrinal andjurisprudential treatment of the boni mores has been marked bythe absence of objective demarcations. In general, its applicationis based on social morality and is focused predominantly on thecontrol of sexual and family living. In this sense, the use of bonimores evinces a homogenizing and unjustified imposition ofthe model of good life defended by the majority groups. Thisreality contradicts the legal recognition of pluralism and laicityas important democratic vectors. In addition, it can be notedthat the ends sought by the boni mores could be satisfactorilyreached through other institutes with more solid dogmatic bases,such as the objective good faith and the public order. In thiscontext, through a theoretical investigation of juridical-dogmaticstrand and comprehensive-propositional type, it is concluded bythe unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores in thecontemporary society.O artigo problematiza a adequabilidade da cláusula geral dos bons costumes à conformação atual do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Nos sistemas de matriz romano-germânica, os bons costumes são tradicionalmente utilizados como limitação à autonomia privada. Trata-se de orientação refletida em diversos dispositivos restritivos do Código Civil de 2002. No Brasil, contudo, o tratamento legal, doutrinário e jurisprudencial dos bons costumes tem sido marcado pela ausência de demarcações objetivas. Em geral, observa-se uma aplicação fundamentada na moral social e voltada preponderantemente para o controle de vivências sexuais e familiares. Nesse sentido, o uso dos bons costumes evidencia uma imposição homogeneizante e injustificada do modelo de vida boa defendido pelos grupos majoritários. Essa realidade contraria o reconhecimento jurídico do pluralismo e da laicidade enquanto importantes vetores democráticos. Ademais, percebe-se que os fins almejados pelos bons costumes poderiam ser atingidos satisfatoriamente por meio de outros institutos com bases dogmáticas mais sólidas, como a boa-fé objetiva e a ordem pública. Nesse contexto, mediante uma investigação teórica, de vertente jurídico-dogmática e tipo compreensivo-propositivo, conclui-se pela insustentabilidade da cláusula geral dos bons costumes na sociedade contemporânea.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3758310.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p175Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 162-1752178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583/48395Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Fabio QueirozLara, Mariana AlvesAndrade, Daniel de Pádua2023-01-26T16:56:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37583Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T16:56:33Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
A insustentabilidade da cláusula geral de bons costumes: pluralismo e laicidade na sociedade contemporâneao
title The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
spellingShingle The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Bons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais.
Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses.
title_short The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
title_full The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
title_fullStr The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
title_full_unstemmed The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
title_sort The unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores: pluralism and laicity in contemporary society
author Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
author_facet Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Lara, Mariana Alves
Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
author_role author
author2 Lara, Mariana Alves
Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Fabio Queiroz
Lara, Mariana Alves
Andrade, Daniel de Pádua
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais.
Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses.
topic Bons Costumes. Pluralidade. Laicidade. Cláusulas Gerais.
Boni mores. Pluralism. Laicity. General clauses.
description The paper problematizes the suitability of the generalclause of boni mores in view of the current conformation ofBrazilian legal order. In Roman-German matrix systems, the bonimores are traditionally used as a limitation to private autonomy.This guideline is reflected in several restrictive provisions of theCivil Code of 2002. In Brazil, however, the legal, doctrinal andjurisprudential treatment of the boni mores has been marked bythe absence of objective demarcations. In general, its applicationis based on social morality and is focused predominantly on thecontrol of sexual and family living. In this sense, the use of bonimores evinces a homogenizing and unjustified imposition ofthe model of good life defended by the majority groups. Thisreality contradicts the legal recognition of pluralism and laicityas important democratic vectors. In addition, it can be notedthat the ends sought by the boni mores could be satisfactorilyreached through other institutes with more solid dogmatic bases,such as the objective good faith and the public order. In thiscontext, through a theoretical investigation of juridical-dogmaticstrand and comprehensive-propositional type, it is concluded bythe unsustainability of the general clause of boni mores in thecontemporary society.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p175
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n3p175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/37583/48395
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 3 (2019); 162-175
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015601065984

Registros relacionados