Construction and evaluation of the structuring modeling of the program of educational actions for Nursing

• Autor(a) principal: Izaguirres, Angélica de Lima
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Silva, Caroline Barbosa da, Lima, Ana Amélia Antunes, Paz, Adriana Aparecida
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por; eng
• Título da fonte: Reme (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/40704
• topic: Enfermagem; Aprendizagem; Educação Continuada; Serviço Hospitalar de Educação; Capacitação de Recursos Humanos em Saúde; Nursing; Learning; Education, Continuing; Education Department, Hospital; Health Human Resource Training; Enfermería; Aprendizaje; Educación Continua; Servicio de Educación en Hospital; Capacitación de Recursos Humanos en Salud

Objective: to build and evaluate the structuring modeling of the Educational Actions Program for Nursing (PAEE-Programa de Ações Educativas para Enfermagem). Method: this is a methodological study consisting of two stages. The first one covered the understanding of the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMN) modeling and added documents and institutional research for the first version of the model. The second stage was a working group carried out under the Joint Application Design (JAD) method with 9 managers of the Nursing care areas of a private hospital in Rio Grande do Sul. To evaluate the modeling, 13 items were defined and evaluated by a Likert scale. The analysis was performed using the consensus index (CI>0.80) and comparison of means and standard deviation (p<0.05) of the first and last evaluation of the modeling. Results: four sessions were held, with the participation of six managers in the last session. Between the first and last evaluation, when comparing means, it was highlighted that: the sequence is logical (p=0.008), steps are clear (p=0.013), language is clear and coherent (p=0.008), load annual time of educational actions is adequate (p=0.002), the quarterly period for the observational evaluation is sufficient (p=0.017) and performance evaluation meets the steps (p=0.018). The global assessment of the 13 items by the CI demonstrated the maturity of the modeling (CI=0.41 to CI=0.94) sustained by the collective sharing of ideas, suggestions, and recommendations on the modeling of the PAEE. Conclusion: the construction and evaluation of the PAEE modeling based on documents, research, and experiences through a working group showed the appreciation of educational actions aligned with the work processes for implementation in the institution.