The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
DOI: | 10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.661 |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/661 |
Resumo: | The present article have the objective of analyzing the epistemological problem of the Socratic paradox. In the first step of this work we will present the problem from a Brickhouse and Smith point of view. After that, we will present an objection done about Socrates telling the truth or telling lies about the knowledge, which is one solution to the problem. After that, we will work in the division of two kind of knowledge where one kind makes the people wise, and one not. Therefore, we will be studying 3 ways of getting knowledge: divinatory, common sense and elenchos. We will present as well an explanation about an article called “Individualism and the mental” from Tyler Burge we will present a mental experiment described by him to demonstrate the non insular formation of concepts and the idea proposed by him about not knowing the complete concept. After that, in the end, we will present an alternative and complementary idea about Brickhouse and Smith theory to resolve the problem. |
id |
UFRB-4_f27df18d9a4a7a1b1721ace4d5622516 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/661 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
spelling |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothingO paradoxo socrático: a ideia de saber que nada se sabeSócrates; Paradoxo; Epistemologia; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge.Socrates; Paradox; Epistemology; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge.The present article have the objective of analyzing the epistemological problem of the Socratic paradox. In the first step of this work we will present the problem from a Brickhouse and Smith point of view. After that, we will present an objection done about Socrates telling the truth or telling lies about the knowledge, which is one solution to the problem. After that, we will work in the division of two kind of knowledge where one kind makes the people wise, and one not. Therefore, we will be studying 3 ways of getting knowledge: divinatory, common sense and elenchos. We will present as well an explanation about an article called “Individualism and the mental” from Tyler Burge we will present a mental experiment described by him to demonstrate the non insular formation of concepts and the idea proposed by him about not knowing the complete concept. After that, in the end, we will present an alternative and complementary idea about Brickhouse and Smith theory to resolve the problem.O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar o problema epistemológico do paradoxo socrático. Em uma primeira parte do trabalho, apresentaremos o problema segundo Brickhouse and Smith, após a apresentação do problema, em seguida apresentaremos uma objeção feita sobre a honestidade de Sócrates e como uma possível desonestidade resolveria o problema facilmente. Após isso, trabalharemos a divisão entre dois tipos de conhecimento onde um torna seu possuidor um sábio e outro não. Ainda, ao longo do trabalho, estudaremos as três vias principais de obtenção de conhecimento para Sócrates: divinatória, senso comum e elenchos. Apresentaremos também uma explicação sobre o artigo Individualism and the mental, de Tyler Burge onde apresentaremos um experimento mental descrito pelo autor para demonstrar a formação não insular de conceitos e a ideia proposta por ele sobre o entendimento incompleto. Feito isso, ao final, apresentaremos uma proposta alternativa e complementar a teoria de Brickhouse and Smith para a resolução desse aparente paradoxo.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2015-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/66110.31977/grirfi.v12i2.661Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2015); 186-1952178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/661/377Copyright (c) 2015 Homero Damoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDamo, Homero2020-06-30T18:17:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/661Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:17:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing O paradoxo socrático: a ideia de saber que nada se sabe |
title |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing |
spellingShingle |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing Damo, Homero Sócrates; Paradoxo; Epistemologia; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. Socrates; Paradox; Epistemology; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. Damo, Homero Sócrates; Paradoxo; Epistemologia; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. Socrates; Paradox; Epistemology; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. |
title_short |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing |
title_full |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing |
title_fullStr |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing |
title_full_unstemmed |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing |
title_sort |
The socratic paradox: the idea know of knowing nothing |
author |
Damo, Homero |
author_facet |
Damo, Homero Damo, Homero |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Damo, Homero |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sócrates; Paradoxo; Epistemologia; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. Socrates; Paradox; Epistemology; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. |
topic |
Sócrates; Paradoxo; Epistemologia; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. Socrates; Paradox; Epistemology; Brickhouse and Smith; Tyler Burge. |
description |
The present article have the objective of analyzing the epistemological problem of the Socratic paradox. In the first step of this work we will present the problem from a Brickhouse and Smith point of view. After that, we will present an objection done about Socrates telling the truth or telling lies about the knowledge, which is one solution to the problem. After that, we will work in the division of two kind of knowledge where one kind makes the people wise, and one not. Therefore, we will be studying 3 ways of getting knowledge: divinatory, common sense and elenchos. We will present as well an explanation about an article called “Individualism and the mental” from Tyler Burge we will present a mental experiment described by him to demonstrate the non insular formation of concepts and the idea proposed by him about not knowing the complete concept. After that, in the end, we will present an alternative and complementary idea about Brickhouse and Smith theory to resolve the problem. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/661 10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.661 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/661 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.661 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/661/377 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Homero Damo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Homero Damo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2015); 186-195 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822164695073685504 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.661 |