Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Francisco José da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/article/view/107696
Resumo: This paper aims to discuss controversies around the new Fundeb, which was approved in August 2020 through Constitutional Amendment No. 108. It is assumed that the origin of the policy of funds in education and of Fundeb itself goes back to the disputes fought since the Education Pioneers’ National Movement in the 1930s, extending until at least 1960, being taken up by social movements since 1990. In methodological terms, bibliographic and documentary research was used, focusing on articles, legal frameworks concerning public funds, revised versions of the Constitutional Amendment No. 15, 2015, and Fineduca’s manifestations about the new Fundeb from February to July 2020. The main findings are as follows: The Union should invest more resources in basic education without compromising other educational actions; and the need to carry out researches that take into consideration deeper historical aspects connected to the public policy education funding.
id UFRGS-27_e6c67e64040c9221ce8a5558042fbe44
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/107696
network_acronym_str UFRGS-27
network_name_str FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
repository_id_str
spelling Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), BrazilControversias sobre las discusiones en torno al nuevo Fondo de Mantenimiento y Desarrollo de la Educación Primaria y Valorización de los Profesionales de la Educación (Fundeb), BrasilPolêmicas ao longo das discussões em torno do novo Fundo de Manutenção e Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica e de Valorização dos Profissionais da Educação (Fundeb), BrasilEducationBasic EducationEducation FinancingNovo FundebEducaciónEducación primariaFinanciamiento de la EducaciónEducaçãoEducação BásicaFinanciamento da EducaçãoThis paper aims to discuss controversies around the new Fundeb, which was approved in August 2020 through Constitutional Amendment No. 108. It is assumed that the origin of the policy of funds in education and of Fundeb itself goes back to the disputes fought since the Education Pioneers’ National Movement in the 1930s, extending until at least 1960, being taken up by social movements since 1990. In methodological terms, bibliographic and documentary research was used, focusing on articles, legal frameworks concerning public funds, revised versions of the Constitutional Amendment No. 15, 2015, and Fineduca’s manifestations about the new Fundeb from February to July 2020. The main findings are as follows: The Union should invest more resources in basic education without compromising other educational actions; and the need to carry out researches that take into consideration deeper historical aspects connected to the public policy education funding.El objetivo de este artículo es discutir las controversias en torno al nuevo Fundeb, que fue aprobado en agosto de 2020 mediante la Enmienda Constitucional n° 108. Se asume que el origen de la política de los fondos en la educación y del propio Fundeb remonta a las disputas entre el Movimiento Nacional de los Pioneros de la Educación en la década de 1930 y se extiende hasta por lo menos 1960, siendo retomado por los movimientos sociales a partir de 1990. En términos metodológicos, se utilizó una investigación bibliográfica y documental, centrándose en artículos, marcos legales sobre fondos públicos, sustitutos de la Propuesta de Enmienda Constitucional nº 15/2015 y las manifestaciones de Fineduca sobre el nuevo Fundeb de febrero a julio de 2020. Las principales conclusiones son: la Unión (União) debería invertir más recursos en la educación básica sin comprometer otras acciones educativas; la necesidad de realizar investigaciones que tengan en cuenta de forma más profunda los aspectos históricos relacionados con la política de fondos en la educación.O objetivo deste artigo é discutir polêmicas em torno do novo Fundeb, que foi aprovado em agosto de 2020 por intermédio da Emenda Constitucional n.º 108. Assume-se que a origem da política de fundos na educação e do próprio Fundeb remonta às disputas travadas desde o Movimento Nacional dos Pioneiros da Educação na década de 1930 e que se estendem até pelo menos 1960, sendo retomadas pelos movimentos sociais a partir de 1990. Em termos metodológicos, recorreu-se à pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, tendo como foco artigos, marcos legais sobre fundos públicos, substitutivos à Proposta de Emenda Constitucional n.º 15/2015 e as manifestações da Fineduca sobre o novo Fundeb de fevereiro a julho de 2020. As principais descobertas são: a União deveria investir mais recursos na educação básica sem comprometer outras ações educacionais; a necessidade de se realizar pesquisas que levem em consideração de maneira mais aprofundada os aspectos históricos relacionados à política de fundos na educação. Associação Nacional de Pesquisa em Financiamento da Educação2022-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/article/view/10769610.22491/2236-5907107696FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação; Vol. 12 (2022)FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação; Vol. 12 (2022)FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação; v. 12 (2022)2236-5907reponame:FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educaçãoinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/article/view/107696/84371Copyright (c) 2022 FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Francisco José da2022-06-02T14:16:48Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/107696Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/oairevista.fineduca@gmail.com || jacominimarcia@gmail.com10.22491/fineduca-2236-59072236-59072236-5907opendoar:2022-06-02T14:16:48FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
Controversias sobre las discusiones en torno al nuevo Fondo de Mantenimiento y Desarrollo de la Educación Primaria y Valorización de los Profesionales de la Educación (Fundeb), Brasil
Polêmicas ao longo das discussões em torno do novo Fundo de Manutenção e Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica e de Valorização dos Profissionais da Educação (Fundeb), Brasil
title Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
spellingShingle Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
Silva, Francisco José da
Education
Basic Education
Education Financing
Novo Fundeb
Educación
Educación primaria
Financiamiento de la Educación
Educação
Educação Básica
Financiamento da Educação
title_short Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
title_full Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
title_fullStr Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
title_sort Controversies over the discussions around the new Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Appreciation of Education Workers (Fundeb), Brazil
author Silva, Francisco José da
author_facet Silva, Francisco José da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Francisco José da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Education
Basic Education
Education Financing
Novo Fundeb
Educación
Educación primaria
Financiamiento de la Educación
Educação
Educação Básica
Financiamento da Educação
topic Education
Basic Education
Education Financing
Novo Fundeb
Educación
Educación primaria
Financiamiento de la Educación
Educação
Educação Básica
Financiamento da Educação
description This paper aims to discuss controversies around the new Fundeb, which was approved in August 2020 through Constitutional Amendment No. 108. It is assumed that the origin of the policy of funds in education and of Fundeb itself goes back to the disputes fought since the Education Pioneers’ National Movement in the 1930s, extending until at least 1960, being taken up by social movements since 1990. In methodological terms, bibliographic and documentary research was used, focusing on articles, legal frameworks concerning public funds, revised versions of the Constitutional Amendment No. 15, 2015, and Fineduca’s manifestations about the new Fundeb from February to July 2020. The main findings are as follows: The Union should invest more resources in basic education without compromising other educational actions; and the need to carry out researches that take into consideration deeper historical aspects connected to the public policy education funding.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/article/view/107696
10.22491/2236-5907107696
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/article/view/107696
identifier_str_mv 10.22491/2236-5907107696
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/fineduca/article/view/107696/84371
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pesquisa em Financiamento da Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional de Pesquisa em Financiamento da Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação; Vol. 12 (2022)
FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação; Vol. 12 (2022)
FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação; v. 12 (2022)
2236-5907
reponame:FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
collection FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação
repository.name.fl_str_mv FINEDUCA - Revista de Financiamento da Educação - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.fineduca@gmail.com || jacominimarcia@gmail.com
_version_ 1797050275381379072