Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruck, Mozahir Salomão
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Intexto (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928
Resumo: This paper proposes a reflection about the journalism professional practice. It is presumed that the theories, concepts and notions developed, in the last decades and all over the world, to support the journalism practice as a field of knowledge and a social influence vector have little influenced or contributed to diminish many of the main deviations, incongruity and deficiencies that have already been diagnosed within its field. In summary, the question is: why the theoretical studies in the journalism field have little contributed to improve its professional exercise? This question seems to increase its relevance whenever it considers that as far as journalism functions of mediating and setting the every day life by its sociotechnical means, the journalism itself have experimented important transformations in its enunciation modes of production and distribution by which it attempts to introduce to its public their everydayness.
id UFRGS-6_6afd16d7a9bd74a2b97fb1c19cde0a55
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/22928
network_acronym_str UFRGS-6
network_name_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?Periodistas y teoría: ¿conciliación posible?Jornalitas e teorias: conciliação possível?Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais.Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices.Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales.This paper proposes a reflection about the journalism professional practice. It is presumed that the theories, concepts and notions developed, in the last decades and all over the world, to support the journalism practice as a field of knowledge and a social influence vector have little influenced or contributed to diminish many of the main deviations, incongruity and deficiencies that have already been diagnosed within its field. In summary, the question is: why the theoretical studies in the journalism field have little contributed to improve its professional exercise? This question seems to increase its relevance whenever it considers that as far as journalism functions of mediating and setting the every day life by its sociotechnical means, the journalism itself have experimented important transformations in its enunciation modes of production and distribution by which it attempts to introduce to its public their everydayness.Este artículo plantea una reflexión que parte del presupuesto de que las teorías, los conceptos y nociones desarrollados especialmente en las últimas décadas en todo el mundo acerca del periodismo, como campo de conocimiento y vector de influencia social, parecen influenciar o contribuir poco para mitigar muchos de los principales desvíos, incongruencias y deficiencias históricamente diagnosticados en relación con el hacer periodístico. En resumen, se pregunta: ¿por qué los estudios teóricos del periodismo contribuyen poco para mejorar las prácticas profesionales de este campo? Dicha interrogante parece ganar aun más relevancia a medida que, en términos de su función de encuadre y mediación del cotidiano y en sus conocidas formas de dispositivo sociotécnico, el propio periodismo experimenta importantes cambios en sus modos de producción y distribución de los enunciados a través de los cuales intenta presentar a sus públicos el cotidiano donde ellos se encuentran.Este artigo se propõe a uma reflexão que tem como ponto de partida o pressuposto de que as teorias, conceitos e noções desenvolvidos especialmente nas últimas décadas em todo o mundo acerca do jornalismo, como campo de conhecimento e vetor de influência social, pouco parecem influenciar ou contribuir para mitigar muitos dos principais desvios, incongruências e deficiências historicamente diagnosticadas em relação ao fazer jornalístico. Em suma, pergunta-se: por que os estudos teóricos do jornalismo contribuem pouco para melhorar as práticas profissionais do campo? Tal questão parece ganhar ainda mais relevância na medida em que, em termos de sua função de enquadramento e mediação do cotidiano e nas suas conhecidas formas em termos de dispositivo sócio-técnico, o próprio jornalismo tem experimentado importantes alterações em seus modos de produção e distribuição dos enunciados por meio dos quais tenta dar conta de apresentar a seus públicos o cotidiano em que esses estão inseridos.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2011-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de Leitura; Entrevista;application/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; Núm. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; N. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; n. 25 (2011); 23-401807-8583reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928/14479Copyright (c) 2011 Mozahir Salomão Bruckhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruck, Mozahir Salomão2023-11-24T17:21:50Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/22928Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intextoONGhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intexto/oai||intexto@ufrgs.br1807-85831807-8583opendoar:2023-11-24T17:21:50Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
Periodistas y teoría: ¿conciliación posible?
Jornalitas e teorias: conciliação possível?
title Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
spellingShingle Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
Bruck, Mozahir Salomão
Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais.
Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices.
Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales.
title_short Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
title_full Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
title_fullStr Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
title_full_unstemmed Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
title_sort Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
author Bruck, Mozahir Salomão
author_facet Bruck, Mozahir Salomão
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruck, Mozahir Salomão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais.
Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices.
Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales.
topic Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais.
Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices.
Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales.
description This paper proposes a reflection about the journalism professional practice. It is presumed that the theories, concepts and notions developed, in the last decades and all over the world, to support the journalism practice as a field of knowledge and a social influence vector have little influenced or contributed to diminish many of the main deviations, incongruity and deficiencies that have already been diagnosed within its field. In summary, the question is: why the theoretical studies in the journalism field have little contributed to improve its professional exercise? This question seems to increase its relevance whenever it considers that as far as journalism functions of mediating and setting the every day life by its sociotechnical means, the journalism itself have experimented important transformations in its enunciation modes of production and distribution by which it attempts to introduce to its public their everydayness.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Revisão de Leitura; Entrevista;
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928/14479
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Mozahir Salomão Bruck
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2011 Mozahir Salomão Bruck
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40
Intexto; Núm. 25 (2011); 23-40
Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40
Intexto; N. 25 (2011); 23-40
Intexto; n. 25 (2011); 23-40
1807-8583
reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
collection Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||intexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766108469723136