Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Intexto (Porto Alegre) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928 |
Resumo: | This paper proposes a reflection about the journalism professional practice. It is presumed that the theories, concepts and notions developed, in the last decades and all over the world, to support the journalism practice as a field of knowledge and a social influence vector have little influenced or contributed to diminish many of the main deviations, incongruity and deficiencies that have already been diagnosed within its field. In summary, the question is: why the theoretical studies in the journalism field have little contributed to improve its professional exercise? This question seems to increase its relevance whenever it considers that as far as journalism functions of mediating and setting the every day life by its sociotechnical means, the journalism itself have experimented important transformations in its enunciation modes of production and distribution by which it attempts to introduce to its public their everydayness. |
id |
UFRGS-6_6afd16d7a9bd74a2b97fb1c19cde0a55 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/22928 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-6 |
network_name_str |
Intexto (Porto Alegre) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible?Periodistas y teoría: ¿conciliación posible?Jornalitas e teorias: conciliação possível?Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais.Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices.Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales.This paper proposes a reflection about the journalism professional practice. It is presumed that the theories, concepts and notions developed, in the last decades and all over the world, to support the journalism practice as a field of knowledge and a social influence vector have little influenced or contributed to diminish many of the main deviations, incongruity and deficiencies that have already been diagnosed within its field. In summary, the question is: why the theoretical studies in the journalism field have little contributed to improve its professional exercise? This question seems to increase its relevance whenever it considers that as far as journalism functions of mediating and setting the every day life by its sociotechnical means, the journalism itself have experimented important transformations in its enunciation modes of production and distribution by which it attempts to introduce to its public their everydayness.Este artículo plantea una reflexión que parte del presupuesto de que las teorías, los conceptos y nociones desarrollados especialmente en las últimas décadas en todo el mundo acerca del periodismo, como campo de conocimiento y vector de influencia social, parecen influenciar o contribuir poco para mitigar muchos de los principales desvíos, incongruencias y deficiencias históricamente diagnosticados en relación con el hacer periodístico. En resumen, se pregunta: ¿por qué los estudios teóricos del periodismo contribuyen poco para mejorar las prácticas profesionales de este campo? Dicha interrogante parece ganar aun más relevancia a medida que, en términos de su función de encuadre y mediación del cotidiano y en sus conocidas formas de dispositivo sociotécnico, el propio periodismo experimenta importantes cambios en sus modos de producción y distribución de los enunciados a través de los cuales intenta presentar a sus públicos el cotidiano donde ellos se encuentran.Este artigo se propõe a uma reflexão que tem como ponto de partida o pressuposto de que as teorias, conceitos e noções desenvolvidos especialmente nas últimas décadas em todo o mundo acerca do jornalismo, como campo de conhecimento e vetor de influência social, pouco parecem influenciar ou contribuir para mitigar muitos dos principais desvios, incongruências e deficiências historicamente diagnosticadas em relação ao fazer jornalístico. Em suma, pergunta-se: por que os estudos teóricos do jornalismo contribuem pouco para melhorar as práticas profissionais do campo? Tal questão parece ganhar ainda mais relevância na medida em que, em termos de sua função de enquadramento e mediação do cotidiano e nas suas conhecidas formas em termos de dispositivo sócio-técnico, o próprio jornalismo tem experimentado importantes alterações em seus modos de produção e distribuição dos enunciados por meio dos quais tenta dar conta de apresentar a seus públicos o cotidiano em que esses estão inseridos.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2011-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de Leitura; Entrevista;application/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; Núm. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; N. 25 (2011); 23-40Intexto; n. 25 (2011); 23-401807-8583reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928/14479Copyright (c) 2011 Mozahir Salomão Bruckhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruck, Mozahir Salomão2023-11-24T17:21:50Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/22928Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intextoONGhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intexto/oai||intexto@ufrgs.br1807-85831807-8583opendoar:2023-11-24T17:21:50Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? Periodistas y teoría: ¿conciliación posible? Jornalitas e teorias: conciliação possível? |
title |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? |
spellingShingle |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? Bruck, Mozahir Salomão Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais. Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices. Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales. |
title_short |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? |
title_full |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? |
title_fullStr |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? |
title_sort |
Journalists and theory: conciliation possible? |
author |
Bruck, Mozahir Salomão |
author_facet |
Bruck, Mozahir Salomão |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bruck, Mozahir Salomão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais. Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices. Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales. |
topic |
Jornalismo. Teorias. Práticas Profissionais. Journalism. Theories. Professional Practices. Periodismo. Teorías. Prácticas Profesionales. |
description |
This paper proposes a reflection about the journalism professional practice. It is presumed that the theories, concepts and notions developed, in the last decades and all over the world, to support the journalism practice as a field of knowledge and a social influence vector have little influenced or contributed to diminish many of the main deviations, incongruity and deficiencies that have already been diagnosed within its field. In summary, the question is: why the theoretical studies in the journalism field have little contributed to improve its professional exercise? This question seems to increase its relevance whenever it considers that as far as journalism functions of mediating and setting the every day life by its sociotechnical means, the journalism itself have experimented important transformations in its enunciation modes of production and distribution by which it attempts to introduce to its public their everydayness. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Revisão de Leitura; Entrevista; |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/22928/14479 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Mozahir Salomão Bruck https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Mozahir Salomão Bruck https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40 Intexto; Núm. 25 (2011); 23-40 Intexto; No. 25 (2011); 23-40 Intexto; N. 25 (2011); 23-40 Intexto; n. 25 (2011); 23-40 1807-8583 reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Intexto (Porto Alegre) |
collection |
Intexto (Porto Alegre) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||intexto@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766108469723136 |