Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Taffarel, Celi Nelza Zulke
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Hack, Cássia, Morschbacher, Márcia, Luz, Sidnéia Flores
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/80039
Resumo: This article discusses the role of the Federal Council of Physical Education and its Regional Councils of Physical Education in the defense of Physical Education workers. It is moved by two questions: What is the Unconstitutionality Action nº 3.428/2005, its origin, its development, and its current stage; what is CONFEF/CREF and its (in)ability to protect the workers? It aims to support the stance of the National Movement Against the Regulation of Physical Education Professionals, to strengthen the labor union in its struggle, to contribute to the Union Movement in Defense of the Labor and Workers Protection System. As our investigation procedure, we used documentary analysis. It demonstrates that this ADIn is valid, has constitutional support, and that the activity of CONFEF/CREF does not grant it prerogatives that allow it to protect the workers. It concludes by the organized defense of the Labor Protection System and the Physical Education Worker based on the associations, considering that the fight for rights is of public interest, because it concerns the life of the workers.
id UFSC-2_8c82af60e0041eb02ae512ca9398a348
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/80039
network_acronym_str UFSC-2
network_name_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the professionSistema de protección del trabajo y del trabajador de la Educación Física: porque somos contra la regulación de la profesiónSistema de proteção do trabalho e do trabalhador da Educação Física: porque somos contra a regulamentação da profissãoThis article discusses the role of the Federal Council of Physical Education and its Regional Councils of Physical Education in the defense of Physical Education workers. It is moved by two questions: What is the Unconstitutionality Action nº 3.428/2005, its origin, its development, and its current stage; what is CONFEF/CREF and its (in)ability to protect the workers? It aims to support the stance of the National Movement Against the Regulation of Physical Education Professionals, to strengthen the labor union in its struggle, to contribute to the Union Movement in Defense of the Labor and Workers Protection System. As our investigation procedure, we used documentary analysis. It demonstrates that this ADIn is valid, has constitutional support, and that the activity of CONFEF/CREF does not grant it prerogatives that allow it to protect the workers. It concludes by the organized defense of the Labor Protection System and the Physical Education Worker based on the associations, considering that the fight for rights is of public interest, because it concerns the life of the workers.El artículo hace problematización a la actuación del Consejo Federal de Educación Física y sus Consejos Regionales en la defensa de los trabajadores(as) de la Educación Física. Surge de dos preguntas: ¿Lo que es la Acción de Inconstitucionalidad nº 3.428/2005, su origen, su desarrollo y su etapa actual? ¿Lo que es el CONFEF/CREF y su (in)capacidad de proteger los trabajadores(as)? Se tiene como objetivos dar aportes a las posiciones del Movimiento Nacional Contra la Regulación de la Profesional de Educación Física, fortalecer la lucha sindical, contribuir con el Movimiento Sindical en Defensa del Sistema de Protección del Trabajo y de los Trabajadores(as). Como procedimiento de investigación fue utilizada un análisis documental. Demuestra que esta ADIn es legítima, tiene respaldo constitucional y que la actuación del CONFEF/CREF no concede prerrogativas hacia la protección del trabajador(a). Concluye con la defensa organizada del Sistema de Protección Laboral y del Trabajador de Educación Física con base en las asociaciones, considerando que la lucha por los derechos es de interés público, porque atañe a la vida de los trabajadores(as).O texto problematiza a atuação do Conselho Federal de Educação Física e seus Conselhos Regionais de Educação Física (CONFEF/CREF) na defesa dos trabalhadores(as) da Educação Física (EF). Parte de duas perguntas: O que é a Ação de Inconstitucionalidade (ADIn) nº 3.428/2005, sua origem, seu desenvolvimento e seu estágio atual; o que é o CONFEF/CREF e sua (in)capacidade de proteger os trabalhadores(as)? Objetiva subsidiar as posições do Movimento Nacional Contra a Regulamentação do Profissional de Educação Física (MNCR), fortalecer a luta sindical, contribuir com o Movimento Sindical em Defesa do Sistema de Proteção do Trabalho e dos(as) Trabalhadores(as). Como procedimentos de investigação valemo-nos da análise documental. Demonstra que esta ADIn procede, tem respaldo constitucional e que a atuação do CONFEF/CREF não lhe concede prerrogativas que permita proteger os trabalhadores(as). Conclui pela defesa organizada do Sistema de Proteção do Trabalho e do(a) Trabalhador(a) da Educação Física a partir das organizações, considerando que a luta pelos direitos é de interesse público, porque dizem respeito à vida dos(as) trabalhadores(as).Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2021-07-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/8003910.5007/2175-8042.2021.e80039Motrivivência; v. 33 n. 64 (2021); 1-192175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/80039/46858Taffarel, Celi Nelza Zulke Hack, Cássia Morschbacher, Márcia Luz, Sidnéia Flores info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-31T13:42:44Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/80039Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2023-05-31T13:42:44Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
Sistema de protección del trabajo y del trabajador de la Educación Física: porque somos contra la regulación de la profesión
Sistema de proteção do trabalho e do trabalhador da Educação Física: porque somos contra a regulamentação da profissão
title Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
spellingShingle Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
Taffarel, Celi Nelza Zulke
title_short Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
title_full Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
title_fullStr Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
title_full_unstemmed Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
title_sort Protection system of work and Physical Education workers: why we are against the regulation of the profession
author Taffarel, Celi Nelza Zulke
author_facet Taffarel, Celi Nelza Zulke
Hack, Cássia
Morschbacher, Márcia
Luz, Sidnéia Flores
author_role author
author2 Hack, Cássia
Morschbacher, Márcia
Luz, Sidnéia Flores
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taffarel, Celi Nelza Zulke
Hack, Cássia
Morschbacher, Márcia
Luz, Sidnéia Flores
description This article discusses the role of the Federal Council of Physical Education and its Regional Councils of Physical Education in the defense of Physical Education workers. It is moved by two questions: What is the Unconstitutionality Action nº 3.428/2005, its origin, its development, and its current stage; what is CONFEF/CREF and its (in)ability to protect the workers? It aims to support the stance of the National Movement Against the Regulation of Physical Education Professionals, to strengthen the labor union in its struggle, to contribute to the Union Movement in Defense of the Labor and Workers Protection System. As our investigation procedure, we used documentary analysis. It demonstrates that this ADIn is valid, has constitutional support, and that the activity of CONFEF/CREF does not grant it prerogatives that allow it to protect the workers. It concludes by the organized defense of the Labor Protection System and the Physical Education Worker based on the associations, considering that the fight for rights is of public interest, because it concerns the life of the workers.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/80039
10.5007/2175-8042.2021.e80039
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/80039
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8042.2021.e80039
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/80039/46858
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Motrivivência; v. 33 n. 64 (2021); 1-19
2175-8042
0103-4111
reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
collection Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||giovani.pires@ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875254379610112

Registros relacionados