Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Bruno Ribeiro
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de, Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done.
id UNICEUB-3_8cda54880d2544555dced479f5a0bcb0
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/8062
network_acronym_str UNICEUB-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative lawPolíticas PúblicasProject. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law.The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done.UniCEUBnoneMarques, Bruno RibeiroOliveira, Odilon Cavallari deCarmona, Paulo Cavichioli2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/806210.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratosRevista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratosRevista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos2236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBenghttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/recent%20jurisprudencehttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20pela%20modifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20da%20jurisprud%C3%AAnciahttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/subsituto%20pela%20correcao%20conforme%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadoreshttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/replacementhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/modificado%20conforme%20avaliadoreshttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/padroinizado%20ingles%20brit%C3%A2nico%20e%20americanohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutido%20por%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadoreshttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20padronizadohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituttohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documentohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/suplementarhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documento%20suplementarhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituoDireitos autorais 2022 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-05T12:28:51Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/8062Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2022-12-05T12:28:51Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
title Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
spellingShingle Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
Marques, Bruno Ribeiro
Políticas Públicas
Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law.
title_short Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
title_full Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
title_fullStr Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
title_full_unstemmed Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
title_sort Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
author Marques, Bruno Ribeiro
author_facet Marques, Bruno Ribeiro
Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de
Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de
Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv none
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Bruno Ribeiro
Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de
Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Políticas Públicas
Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law.
topic Políticas Públicas
Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law.
description The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062
10.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062
url https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062
identifier_str_mv 10.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062/pdf
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/recent%20jurisprudence
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20pela%20modifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20da%20jurisprud%C3%AAncia
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/subsituto%20pela%20correcao%20conforme%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadores
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/replacement
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/modificado%20conforme%20avaliadores
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/padroinizado%20ingles%20brit%C3%A2nico%20e%20americano
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutido%20por%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadores
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20padronizado
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutto
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documento
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/suplementar
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documento%20suplementar
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituo
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos
Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos
2236-1677
2179-8338
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron:UNICEUB
instname_str Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron_str UNICEUB
institution UNICEUB
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com
_version_ 1798328489990946816