Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done. |
id |
UNICEUB-3_8cda54880d2544555dced479f5a0bcb0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/8062 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICEUB-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative lawPolíticas PúblicasProject. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law.The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done.UniCEUBnoneMarques, Bruno RibeiroOliveira, Odilon Cavallari deCarmona, Paulo Cavichioli2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/806210.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratosRevista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratosRevista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos2236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBenghttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/recent%20jurisprudencehttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20pela%20modifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20da%20jurisprud%C3%AAnciahttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/subsituto%20pela%20correcao%20conforme%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadoreshttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/replacementhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/modificado%20conforme%20avaliadoreshttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/padroinizado%20ingles%20brit%C3%A2nico%20e%20americanohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutido%20por%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadoreshttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20padronizadohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituttohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documentohttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/suplementarhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documento%20suplementarhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituoDireitos autorais 2022 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-05T12:28:51Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/8062Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2022-12-05T12:28:51Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
title |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
spellingShingle |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law Marques, Bruno Ribeiro Políticas Públicas Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law. |
title_short |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
title_full |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
title_fullStr |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
title_sort |
Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law |
author |
Marques, Bruno Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Marques, Bruno Ribeiro Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
none |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Bruno Ribeiro Oliveira, Odilon Cavallari de Carmona, Paulo Cavichioli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Políticas Públicas Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law. |
topic |
Políticas Públicas Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law. |
description |
The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062 10.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062 |
url |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/8062/pdf https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/recent%20jurisprudence https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20pela%20modifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20da%20jurisprud%C3%AAncia https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/subsituto%20pela%20correcao%20conforme%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadores https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/replacement https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/modificado%20conforme%20avaliadores https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/padroinizado%20ingles%20brit%C3%A2nico%20e%20americano https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutido%20por%20determina%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20dos%20avaliadores https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto%20padronizado https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substitutto https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituto https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documento https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/suplementar https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/documento%20suplementar https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/downloadSuppFile/8062/substituo |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2022 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 11, n. 3 (2021): Novos institutos jurídicos de licitações e contratos 2236-1677 2179-8338 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) instacron:UNICEUB |
instname_str |
Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
instacron_str |
UNICEUB |
institution |
UNICEUB |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798328489990946816 |