Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Sandro Lucas Reis
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Obara, Cássia Emi, Broietti, Fabiele Cristiane Dias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6706
Resumo: This research presents a systematic literature review of articles on critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education. The objective is (1) to identify articles involving critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education in international journals; and (2) to identify the main characteristics of these articles, in terms of: authors; years of publications; periodicals; authors' institutions; countries; citations; teaching levels; fields; the main references cited; and the number of mentions of the term critical thinking. The methodological procedures were performed according to Okoli’s 8 step guide (2015) for conducting a systemtic review and Bardin's Content Analysis (2011). The database used was the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), from which 63 articles published in 2010-2019 were analyzed. For this, inventories were used to identify the main characteristics of the publications. The results show: a moderate number of articles (63), considering the importance the theme is given in guiding documents; articles (22%) that mention “critical thinking” without citing critical thinking references; articles (78%) that mention “critical thinking” and cite critical thinking references; and a set of articles (32%) that present critical thinking as its main focus, prioritizing the discussion of this theme. In contrast, a set of articles (43%) focused more on proposed teaching approaches than the in-depth investigation/discussion of critical thinking itself. The need for more publications with the main focus on critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education is relevant, as well as research in different contexts such as the evaluation/development of students' and teachers' critical thinking.
id UNIFEI_2b62a159ca5b09e60079e94fcea965b6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6706
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019Pensamiento crítico en educación Científica y educación Matemática: tendencias de investigación de 2010-2019Pensamento crítico no ensino de Ciências e ensino de Matemática: tendências de pesquisa para 2010-2019Pensamiento críticoEducación científicaRevisión sistemática de literaturaCritical thinkingScience educationSystematic literature review.Pensamento críticoEnsino de ciênciasRevisão sistemática da literatura.This research presents a systematic literature review of articles on critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education. The objective is (1) to identify articles involving critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education in international journals; and (2) to identify the main characteristics of these articles, in terms of: authors; years of publications; periodicals; authors' institutions; countries; citations; teaching levels; fields; the main references cited; and the number of mentions of the term critical thinking. The methodological procedures were performed according to Okoli’s 8 step guide (2015) for conducting a systemtic review and Bardin's Content Analysis (2011). The database used was the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), from which 63 articles published in 2010-2019 were analyzed. For this, inventories were used to identify the main characteristics of the publications. The results show: a moderate number of articles (63), considering the importance the theme is given in guiding documents; articles (22%) that mention “critical thinking” without citing critical thinking references; articles (78%) that mention “critical thinking” and cite critical thinking references; and a set of articles (32%) that present critical thinking as its main focus, prioritizing the discussion of this theme. In contrast, a set of articles (43%) focused more on proposed teaching approaches than the in-depth investigation/discussion of critical thinking itself. The need for more publications with the main focus on critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education is relevant, as well as research in different contexts such as the evaluation/development of students' and teachers' critical thinking.Esta investigación presenta una revisión sistemática de la literatura de artículos sobre pensamiento crítico en la educación científica y la educación matemática. El objetivo es (1) identificar artículos que involucren el pensamiento crítico en Educación en Ciencias y Educación en Matemáticas en revistas internacionales; y (2) identificar las características principales de estos artículos, en términos de: autores; años de publicaciones; publicaciones periódicas instituciones de autores; países; citas niveles de enseñanza; campos; las principales referencias citadas; y la cantidad de menciones del término pensamiento crítico. Los procedimientos metodológicos se realizaron de acuerdo con la guía de 8 pasos de Okoli (2015) para realizar una revisión sistemática y el Análisis de contenido de Bardin (2011). La base de datos utilizada fue el Centro de Información de Recursos Educativos (ERIC), del cual se analizaron 63 artículos publicados en 2010-2019. Para esto, se utilizaron inventarios para identificar las principales características de las publicaciones. Los resultados muestran: un número moderado de artículos (63), considerando la importancia que se le da al tema en los documentos de orientación; artículos (22%) que mencionan "pensamiento crítico" sin citar referencias de pensamiento crítico; artículos (78%) que mencionan "pensamiento crítico" y citan referencias de pensamiento crítico; y un conjunto de artículos (32%) que presentan el pensamiento crítico como su enfoque principal, priorizando la discusión de este tema. En contraste, un conjunto de artículos (43%) se centró más en los enfoques de enseñanza propuestos que en la investigación / discusión en profundidad del pensamiento crítico en sí. La necesidad de más publicaciones con el enfoque principal en el pensamiento crítico en la Educación en Ciencias y la Educación en Matemáticas es relevante, así como la investigación en diferentes contextos, como la evaluación / desarrollo del pensamiento crítico de estudiantes y maestros.Esta pesquisa apresenta uma revisão sistemática da literatura de artigos sobre pensamento crítico em Ensino de Ciências e Educação Matemática. O objetivo é (1) identificar artigos que envolvam pensamento crítico no Ensino de Ciências e Educação Matemática em periódicos internacionais; e (2) identificar as principais características desses artigos, em termos de: autores; anos de publicações; periódicos; instituições dos autores; países; citações; níveis de ensino; área; as principais referências citadas; e o número de menções do termo pensamento crítico. Os procedimentos metodológicos foram realizados de acordo com as oito etapas de Okoli (2015) para a realização de uma revisão sistemática e a Análise de conteúdo de Bardin (2011). O banco de dados utilizado foi o Centro de Informações sobre Recursos Educacionais (ERIC), do qual foram analisados ​​63 artigos publicados entre os anos 2010-2019. Para isso, foram utilizados inventários para identificar as principais características das publicações. Os resultados mostram: um número moderado de artigos (63), considerando a importância do tema em documentos norteadores; artigos (22%) que mencionam “pensamento crítico” sem citar referências de pensamento crítico; artigos (78%) que mencionam “pensamento crítico” e citam referências de pensamento crítico; e um conjunto de artigos (32%) que apresentam o pensamento crítico como foco principal, priorizando a discussão deste tema. Por outro lado, foi identificado um conjunto de artigos (43%) que teve maior enfoque nas propostas de ensino do que a investigação/discussão aprofundada do próprio pensamento crítico. É relevante a necessidade de mais publicações com foco principal no pensamento crítico no Ensino de Ciências e Educação Matemática, além de pesquisas em diferentes contextos, como a avaliação/desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico de alunos e professores.Research, Society and Development2020-08-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/670610.33448/rsd-v9i9.6706Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e115996706Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e115996706Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e1159967062525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6706/6240Copyright (c) 2020 Sandro Lucas Reis Costa, Cássia Emi Obara, Fabiele Cristiane Dias Broiettihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Sandro Lucas ReisObara, Cássia EmiBroietti, Fabiele Cristiane Dias2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6706Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:43.978798Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
Pensamiento crítico en educación Científica y educación Matemática: tendencias de investigación de 2010-2019
Pensamento crítico no ensino de Ciências e ensino de Matemática: tendências de pesquisa para 2010-2019
title Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
spellingShingle Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
Costa, Sandro Lucas Reis
Pensamiento crítico
Educación científica
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Critical thinking
Science education
Systematic literature review.
Pensamento crítico
Ensino de ciências
Revisão sistemática da literatura.
title_short Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
title_full Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
title_fullStr Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
title_full_unstemmed Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
title_sort Critical thinking in Science education and Mathematics education: research trends of 2010-2019
author Costa, Sandro Lucas Reis
author_facet Costa, Sandro Lucas Reis
Obara, Cássia Emi
Broietti, Fabiele Cristiane Dias
author_role author
author2 Obara, Cássia Emi
Broietti, Fabiele Cristiane Dias
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Sandro Lucas Reis
Obara, Cássia Emi
Broietti, Fabiele Cristiane Dias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pensamiento crítico
Educación científica
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Critical thinking
Science education
Systematic literature review.
Pensamento crítico
Ensino de ciências
Revisão sistemática da literatura.
topic Pensamiento crítico
Educación científica
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Critical thinking
Science education
Systematic literature review.
Pensamento crítico
Ensino de ciências
Revisão sistemática da literatura.
description This research presents a systematic literature review of articles on critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education. The objective is (1) to identify articles involving critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education in international journals; and (2) to identify the main characteristics of these articles, in terms of: authors; years of publications; periodicals; authors' institutions; countries; citations; teaching levels; fields; the main references cited; and the number of mentions of the term critical thinking. The methodological procedures were performed according to Okoli’s 8 step guide (2015) for conducting a systemtic review and Bardin's Content Analysis (2011). The database used was the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), from which 63 articles published in 2010-2019 were analyzed. For this, inventories were used to identify the main characteristics of the publications. The results show: a moderate number of articles (63), considering the importance the theme is given in guiding documents; articles (22%) that mention “critical thinking” without citing critical thinking references; articles (78%) that mention “critical thinking” and cite critical thinking references; and a set of articles (32%) that present critical thinking as its main focus, prioritizing the discussion of this theme. In contrast, a set of articles (43%) focused more on proposed teaching approaches than the in-depth investigation/discussion of critical thinking itself. The need for more publications with the main focus on critical thinking in Science Education and Mathematics Education is relevant, as well as research in different contexts such as the evaluation/development of students' and teachers' critical thinking.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6706
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.6706
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6706
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.6706
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6706/6240
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Sandro Lucas Reis Costa, Cássia Emi Obara, Fabiele Cristiane Dias Broietti
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Sandro Lucas Reis Costa, Cássia Emi Obara, Fabiele Cristiane Dias Broietti
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e115996706
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e115996706
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e115996706
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052655341666304