The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20203 |
Resumo: | Objective: to measure the critical thinking capacity of medical students at a Brazilian institution from the PC domains and throughout the stages of the course. Methodology: The sample consisted of 312 medical students regularly enrolled at a University in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The study participants were asked to apply the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal III (WG-III) instrument to assess the students' critical thinking skills, in addition to the sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was used for sociodemographic data and for critical thinking scores, in addition to comparative analysis between students from different years of the course. and categorized in the RED sphere, follows the trend of average performance indicated by the domains: Recognize Assumptions (50.61), Evaluate Arguments (50.62) and Draw Conclusions (50.41). The comparative analysis of the data points out that there was no significant difference as a pattern that demonstrates the positive displacement of critical thinking according to students from different stages of the course. ANOVA points out only punctual statistical differences in performance for the 2nd and 4th stages. Conclusion: the critical thinking of the sample studied is below the expectations projected for medical students, the performance in the test shows that the pedagogical strategies of the medical career and the academic perspectives of the students do not seem to have a determining role in the acquisition or improvement of critical thinking. |
id |
UNIFEI_eb119139b6d7f37d580ce4611fc72ab4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20203 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical studentsLa evaluación del pensamiento crítico: un enfoque a los estudiantes de medicina brasileñosA avaliação do pensamento crítico: uma abordagem a estudantes de medicina brasileirosCritical thinkingTeachingMedicine.Pensamento críticoEnsinoMedicina.Pensamiento CríticoEnseñanzaMedicina.Objective: to measure the critical thinking capacity of medical students at a Brazilian institution from the PC domains and throughout the stages of the course. Methodology: The sample consisted of 312 medical students regularly enrolled at a University in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The study participants were asked to apply the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal III (WG-III) instrument to assess the students' critical thinking skills, in addition to the sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was used for sociodemographic data and for critical thinking scores, in addition to comparative analysis between students from different years of the course. and categorized in the RED sphere, follows the trend of average performance indicated by the domains: Recognize Assumptions (50.61), Evaluate Arguments (50.62) and Draw Conclusions (50.41). The comparative analysis of the data points out that there was no significant difference as a pattern that demonstrates the positive displacement of critical thinking according to students from different stages of the course. ANOVA points out only punctual statistical differences in performance for the 2nd and 4th stages. Conclusion: the critical thinking of the sample studied is below the expectations projected for medical students, the performance in the test shows that the pedagogical strategies of the medical career and the academic perspectives of the students do not seem to have a determining role in the acquisition or improvement of critical thinking.Objetivo: medir la capacidad del Pensamiento Crítico de los estudiantes de medicina de una institución brasileña desde los dominios del Pensamiento Crítico y en todas las etapas del curso. Metodología: La muestra se he formada por 312 estudiantes de medicina matriculados regularmente en una Universidad del estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Se solicitó a los participantes del estudio a contestar el instrumento Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal III (WG-III) para evaluar las habilidades de pensamento crítico, además del cuestionario sociodemográfico. Se utilizó análisis descriptivo para datos sociodemográficos y para puntajes de Pensamiento Crítico, además del análisis comparativo entre estudiantes de diferentes años del curso. Resultados: Los hallazgos categorizados en la esfera RED del WG-III, sigue la tendencia de desempeño promedio del puntaje indicado por los dominios: Reconocer Supuestos (50.61 ), Evaluar argumentos (50.62) y sacar conclusiones (50.41). El análisis comparativo de los datos señala que no hubo diferencia significativa como patrón que demuestre el desplazamiento positivo del Pensamiento Crítico según alumnos de diferentes años del curso. ANOVA señala solo diferencias estadísticas puntuales en el desempeño para la 2do y 4to año. Conclusión: el Pensamiento Crítico de la muestra estudiada está por debajo de las expectativas proyectadas para los estudiantes de medicina, el desempeño en la prueba muestra que las estrategias pedagógicas de la carrera de medicina y las perspectivas acadêmicas de los estudiantes no parecen tener un rol determinante en la adquisición o mejora del pensamiento crítico.Objetivo: mensurar a capacidade de pensamento crírtico dos alunos de medicina de uma instituição brasileira a partir dos domínios do PC e no decorrer das etapas do curso. Metodologia: A amostra foi composta por 312 estudantes de medicina regularmente matriculados em uma Universidade do estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Foi proposto aos participantes do estudo a aplicação do instrumento Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal III (WG-III) para avaliar as competências de pensamento crítico dos alunos, além do questionário sociodemográfico. Utilizou-se análise descritiva para os dados sociodemográficos e para as pontuações quanto ao pensamento crítico, além de análise comparativa entre os alunos dos diferentes anos do curso Resultados: O desempenho da avaliação do Pensamento Crítico a pontuação geral média da habilidade de pensamento crítico foi 50.64 e categorizada na esfera REDã segue a tendência de desempenho mediano apontado pelos domínios: Reconhecer Suposições (50.61), Avaliar Argumentos (50.62) e Tirar Conclusões (50.41). A análise comparativa dos dados aponta que não houve diferença significante como padrão que demonstre o deslocamento positivo do pensamento crítico conforme entre os alunos das diferentes etapas do curso. A ANOVA aponta diferença estatística pontuais apenas de desempenho para as 2° e 4° etapas. Conclusão: o pensamento crítico da amostra estudada está aquém das expectativas projetadas para os alunos de medicina, o desempenho na prova mostra que as estratégias pedagógicas da carreira médica e as perspectivas acadêmicas dos alunos não parecem ter um papel determinante na aquisição ou aprimoramento de pensamento crítico.Research, Society and Development2021-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2020310.33448/rsd-v10i12.20203Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e122101220203Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e122101220203Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e1221012202032525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20203/18047Copyright (c) 2021 Aline Lopes de Almeida; Daniel Leite Portellahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Aline Lopes de Portella, Daniel Leite 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20203Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:55.234131Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students La evaluación del pensamiento crítico: un enfoque a los estudiantes de medicina brasileños A avaliação do pensamento crítico: uma abordagem a estudantes de medicina brasileiros |
title |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students |
spellingShingle |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students Almeida, Aline Lopes de Critical thinking Teaching Medicine. Pensamento crítico Ensino Medicina. Pensamiento Crítico Enseñanza Medicina. |
title_short |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students |
title_full |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students |
title_fullStr |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students |
title_full_unstemmed |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students |
title_sort |
The assessment of critical thinking: an approach to Brazilian medical students |
author |
Almeida, Aline Lopes de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Aline Lopes de Portella, Daniel Leite |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Portella, Daniel Leite |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Aline Lopes de Portella, Daniel Leite |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Critical thinking Teaching Medicine. Pensamento crítico Ensino Medicina. Pensamiento Crítico Enseñanza Medicina. |
topic |
Critical thinking Teaching Medicine. Pensamento crítico Ensino Medicina. Pensamiento Crítico Enseñanza Medicina. |
description |
Objective: to measure the critical thinking capacity of medical students at a Brazilian institution from the PC domains and throughout the stages of the course. Methodology: The sample consisted of 312 medical students regularly enrolled at a University in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The study participants were asked to apply the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal III (WG-III) instrument to assess the students' critical thinking skills, in addition to the sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was used for sociodemographic data and for critical thinking scores, in addition to comparative analysis between students from different years of the course. and categorized in the RED sphere, follows the trend of average performance indicated by the domains: Recognize Assumptions (50.61), Evaluate Arguments (50.62) and Draw Conclusions (50.41). The comparative analysis of the data points out that there was no significant difference as a pattern that demonstrates the positive displacement of critical thinking according to students from different stages of the course. ANOVA points out only punctual statistical differences in performance for the 2nd and 4th stages. Conclusion: the critical thinking of the sample studied is below the expectations projected for medical students, the performance in the test shows that the pedagogical strategies of the medical career and the academic perspectives of the students do not seem to have a determining role in the acquisition or improvement of critical thinking. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20203 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20203 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20203 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20203/18047 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Aline Lopes de Almeida; Daniel Leite Portella https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Aline Lopes de Almeida; Daniel Leite Portella https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e122101220203 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e122101220203 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e122101220203 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052689682530304 |