Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
Texto Completo: | https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, research on the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers has shown the influence of beliefs on curriculum decisions, the relationship between beliefs and pedagogical practices, the small contribution of undergraduate courses in changing beliefs, the contribution from previous experiences in pedagogical beliefs. In this context, synthesizing the main qualitative data can contribute to an understanding of the beliefs of future teachers in the context of initial training.OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-synthesis regarding the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers.METHODS: We performed a meta-synthesis, characterized as a systematic review methodology in which the results of qualitative studies. The results of the 9 original articles were analyzed and synthesized using the content analysis technique. The categories were determined a priori in: purposes, contents and strategies.RESULTS: There is a difference regarding beliefs about the purpose, while novice academics believe that Physical Education should focus on the physical and motor development of students, undergraduates believe that Physical Education can develop several aspects. Regarding beliefs about content, future teachers believe that technique should be privileged. Regarding beliefs about strategies, academics are divided into those who prefer analytical tasks and those who prefer global tasks.CONCLUSION: The difference in beliefs among future teachers is highlighted, allowing them to be classified as traditional and constructivist. Traditional people believe in the teaching and learning process centered on the teacher, in the purpose of Physical Education aimed at physical and motor development and in analytical tasks. Constructivists believe that students should actively participate in classes, have a more complex view of Physical Education, prefer to use global tasks and less directive types of instruction. |
id |
UNIOESTE-3_99fc714c20d3412defe2f2594dae2d15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/28499 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-3 |
network_name_str |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis Crenças de futuros professores de educação física: uma metassíntese crençasfuturos professoreseducação físicaBeliefsfuture teachersphysical educationBACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, research on the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers has shown the influence of beliefs on curriculum decisions, the relationship between beliefs and pedagogical practices, the small contribution of undergraduate courses in changing beliefs, the contribution from previous experiences in pedagogical beliefs. In this context, synthesizing the main qualitative data can contribute to an understanding of the beliefs of future teachers in the context of initial training.OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-synthesis regarding the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers.METHODS: We performed a meta-synthesis, characterized as a systematic review methodology in which the results of qualitative studies. The results of the 9 original articles were analyzed and synthesized using the content analysis technique. The categories were determined a priori in: purposes, contents and strategies.RESULTS: There is a difference regarding beliefs about the purpose, while novice academics believe that Physical Education should focus on the physical and motor development of students, undergraduates believe that Physical Education can develop several aspects. Regarding beliefs about content, future teachers believe that technique should be privileged. Regarding beliefs about strategies, academics are divided into those who prefer analytical tasks and those who prefer global tasks.CONCLUSION: The difference in beliefs among future teachers is highlighted, allowing them to be classified as traditional and constructivist. Traditional people believe in the teaching and learning process centered on the teacher, in the purpose of Physical Education aimed at physical and motor development and in analytical tasks. Constructivists believe that students should actively participate in classes, have a more complex view of Physical Education, prefer to use global tasks and less directive types of instruction.INTRODUÇÃO: Nos últimos vinte anos, pesquisas sobre as crenças de futuros professores de Educação Física têm evidenciado a influência das crenças nas decisões curriculares, a relação das crenças e as práticas pedagógicas, a pequena contribuição dos cursos de graduação nas mudanças das crenças, a contribuição das experiencias prévias nas crenças pedagógicas. Diante desse contexto, sintetizar os principais dados qualitativos pode contribuir para uma compreensão a respeito das crenças dos futuros professores no contexto da formação inicial.OBJETIVO: Realizar uma metassíntese a respeito das crenças de futuros professores de Educação Física.MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma metassíntese, caracterizada como uma metodologia de revisão sistemática em que os resultados de estudos qualitativos. Os resultados dos 9 artigos originais foram analisados e sintetizados a partir da técnica de análise de conteúdo. As categorias foram determinadas a priori em: propósitos, conteúdos e estratégias.RESULTADOS: Existe diferença a respeito das crenças sobre o propósito, enquanto os acadêmicos novatos acreditam que a Educação Física deve focar no desenvolvimento físico e motor dos alunos, os graduandos acreditam que a Educação Física pode desenvolver diversos aspectos. Referente as crenças sobre o conteúdo, os futuros professores acreditam que a técnica deve ser privilegiada. A respeito das crenças sobre as estratégias, os acadêmicos se dividem naqueles que preferem as tarefas analíticas e os que preferem as tarefas globais. CONCLUSÃO: Destaca-se a diferença nas crenças entre futuros professores, permitindo classificá-los como tradicionais e construtivistas. Os tradicionais acreditam no processo de ensino e aprendizagem centrado no professor, no propósito da Educação Física voltado ao desenvolvimento físico e motor e nas tarefas analíticas. Os construtivistas acreditam que os alunos devem participar ativamente das aulas, possuem uma visão mais complexa da Educação Física, preferem utilizar tarefas globais e tipos de instrução menos diretivas.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná2022-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/2849910.36453/cefe.2022.28499Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-28499Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-284992318-50902318-5104reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporteinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499/20583Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhadoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRistow, LeonardoBackes, Ana Flávia Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius Braz, André Luiz de OliveiraBarros, Thais Emanuelli da SilvaRamos, ValmorPrá Steinbach, Morgana2023-07-13T17:26:22Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/28499Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/oairevista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br2318-50902318-5090opendoar:2023-07-13T17:26:22Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis Crenças de futuros professores de educação física: uma metassíntese |
title |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis |
spellingShingle |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis Ristow, Leonardo crenças futuros professores educação física Beliefs future teachers physical education |
title_short |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis |
title_full |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis |
title_fullStr |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis |
title_sort |
Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis |
author |
Ristow, Leonardo |
author_facet |
Ristow, Leonardo Backes, Ana Flávia Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva Ramos, Valmor Prá Steinbach, Morgana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Backes, Ana Flávia Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva Ramos, Valmor Prá Steinbach, Morgana |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ristow, Leonardo Backes, Ana Flávia Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva Ramos, Valmor Prá Steinbach, Morgana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
crenças futuros professores educação física Beliefs future teachers physical education |
topic |
crenças futuros professores educação física Beliefs future teachers physical education |
description |
BACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, research on the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers has shown the influence of beliefs on curriculum decisions, the relationship between beliefs and pedagogical practices, the small contribution of undergraduate courses in changing beliefs, the contribution from previous experiences in pedagogical beliefs. In this context, synthesizing the main qualitative data can contribute to an understanding of the beliefs of future teachers in the context of initial training.OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-synthesis regarding the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers.METHODS: We performed a meta-synthesis, characterized as a systematic review methodology in which the results of qualitative studies. The results of the 9 original articles were analyzed and synthesized using the content analysis technique. The categories were determined a priori in: purposes, contents and strategies.RESULTS: There is a difference regarding beliefs about the purpose, while novice academics believe that Physical Education should focus on the physical and motor development of students, undergraduates believe that Physical Education can develop several aspects. Regarding beliefs about content, future teachers believe that technique should be privileged. Regarding beliefs about strategies, academics are divided into those who prefer analytical tasks and those who prefer global tasks.CONCLUSION: The difference in beliefs among future teachers is highlighted, allowing them to be classified as traditional and constructivist. Traditional people believe in the teaching and learning process centered on the teacher, in the purpose of Physical Education aimed at physical and motor development and in analytical tasks. Constructivists believe that students should actively participate in classes, have a more complex view of Physical Education, prefer to use global tasks and less directive types of instruction. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499 10.36453/cefe.2022.28499 |
url |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36453/cefe.2022.28499 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499/20583 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-28499 Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-28499 2318-5090 2318-5104 reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
collection |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br |
_version_ |
1798313412110843904 |