Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ristow, Leonardo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Backes, Ana Flávia, Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius, Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira, Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva, Ramos, Valmor, Prá Steinbach, Morgana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, research on the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers has shown the influence of beliefs on curriculum decisions, the relationship between beliefs and pedagogical practices, the small contribution of undergraduate courses in changing beliefs, the contribution from previous experiences in pedagogical beliefs. In this context, synthesizing the main qualitative data can contribute to an understanding of the beliefs of future teachers in the context of initial training.OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-synthesis regarding the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers.METHODS: We performed a meta-synthesis, characterized as a systematic review methodology in which the results of qualitative studies. The results of the 9 original articles were analyzed and synthesized using the content analysis technique. The categories were determined a priori in: purposes, contents and strategies.RESULTS: There is a difference regarding beliefs about the purpose, while novice academics believe that Physical Education should focus on the physical and motor development of students, undergraduates believe that Physical Education can develop several aspects. Regarding beliefs about content, future teachers believe that technique should be privileged. Regarding beliefs about strategies, academics are divided into those who prefer analytical tasks and those who prefer global tasks.CONCLUSION: The difference in beliefs among future teachers is highlighted, allowing them to be classified as traditional and constructivist. Traditional people believe in the teaching and learning process centered on the teacher, in the purpose of Physical Education aimed at physical and motor development and in analytical tasks. Constructivists believe that students should actively participate in classes, have a more complex view of Physical Education, prefer to use global tasks and less directive types of instruction.
id UNIOESTE-3_99fc714c20d3412defe2f2594dae2d15
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/28499
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-3
network_name_str Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
repository_id_str
spelling Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis Crenças de futuros professores de educação física: uma metassíntese crençasfuturos professoreseducação físicaBeliefsfuture teachersphysical educationBACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, research on the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers has shown the influence of beliefs on curriculum decisions, the relationship between beliefs and pedagogical practices, the small contribution of undergraduate courses in changing beliefs, the contribution from previous experiences in pedagogical beliefs. In this context, synthesizing the main qualitative data can contribute to an understanding of the beliefs of future teachers in the context of initial training.OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-synthesis regarding the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers.METHODS: We performed a meta-synthesis, characterized as a systematic review methodology in which the results of qualitative studies. The results of the 9 original articles were analyzed and synthesized using the content analysis technique. The categories were determined a priori in: purposes, contents and strategies.RESULTS: There is a difference regarding beliefs about the purpose, while novice academics believe that Physical Education should focus on the physical and motor development of students, undergraduates believe that Physical Education can develop several aspects. Regarding beliefs about content, future teachers believe that technique should be privileged. Regarding beliefs about strategies, academics are divided into those who prefer analytical tasks and those who prefer global tasks.CONCLUSION: The difference in beliefs among future teachers is highlighted, allowing them to be classified as traditional and constructivist. Traditional people believe in the teaching and learning process centered on the teacher, in the purpose of Physical Education aimed at physical and motor development and in analytical tasks. Constructivists believe that students should actively participate in classes, have a more complex view of Physical Education, prefer to use global tasks and less directive types of instruction.INTRODUÇÃO: Nos últimos vinte anos, pesquisas sobre as crenças de futuros professores de Educação Física têm evidenciado a influência das crenças nas decisões curriculares, a relação das crenças e as práticas pedagógicas, a pequena contribuição dos cursos de graduação nas mudanças das crenças, a contribuição das experiencias prévias nas crenças pedagógicas. Diante desse contexto, sintetizar os principais dados qualitativos pode contribuir para uma compreensão a respeito das crenças dos futuros professores no contexto da formação inicial.OBJETIVO: Realizar uma metassíntese a respeito das crenças de futuros professores de Educação Física.MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma metassíntese, caracterizada como uma metodologia de revisão sistemática em que os resultados de estudos qualitativos. Os resultados dos 9 artigos originais foram analisados e sintetizados a partir da técnica de análise de conteúdo. As categorias foram determinadas a priori em: propósitos, conteúdos e estratégias.RESULTADOS: Existe diferença a respeito das crenças sobre o propósito, enquanto os acadêmicos novatos acreditam que a Educação Física deve focar no desenvolvimento físico e motor dos alunos, os graduandos acreditam que a Educação Física pode desenvolver diversos aspectos. Referente as crenças sobre o conteúdo, os futuros professores acreditam que a técnica deve ser privilegiada. A respeito das crenças sobre as estratégias, os acadêmicos se dividem naqueles que preferem as tarefas analíticas e os que preferem as tarefas globais. CONCLUSÃO: Destaca-se a diferença nas crenças entre futuros professores, permitindo classificá-los como tradicionais e construtivistas. Os tradicionais acreditam no processo de ensino e aprendizagem centrado no professor, no propósito da Educação Física voltado ao desenvolvimento físico e motor e nas tarefas analíticas. Os construtivistas acreditam que os alunos devem participar ativamente das aulas, possuem uma visão mais complexa da Educação Física, preferem utilizar tarefas globais e tipos de instrução menos diretivas.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná2022-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/2849910.36453/cefe.2022.28499Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-28499Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-284992318-50902318-5104reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporteinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499/20583Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhadoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRistow, LeonardoBackes, Ana Flávia Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius Braz, André Luiz de OliveiraBarros, Thais Emanuelli da SilvaRamos, ValmorPrá Steinbach, Morgana2023-07-13T17:26:22Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/28499Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/oairevista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br2318-50902318-5090opendoar:2023-07-13T17:26:22Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
Crenças de futuros professores de educação física: uma metassíntese
title Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
spellingShingle Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
Ristow, Leonardo
crenças
futuros professores
educação física
Beliefs
future teachers
physical education
title_short Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
title_full Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
title_fullStr Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
title_full_unstemmed Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
title_sort Physical education pre-service teachers’ beliefs: a metasysthesis
author Ristow, Leonardo
author_facet Ristow, Leonardo
Backes, Ana Flávia
Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius
Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira
Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva
Ramos, Valmor
Prá Steinbach, Morgana
author_role author
author2 Backes, Ana Flávia
Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius
Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira
Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva
Ramos, Valmor
Prá Steinbach, Morgana
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ristow, Leonardo
Backes, Ana Flávia
Zeilmann Brasil, Vinicius
Braz, André Luiz de Oliveira
Barros, Thais Emanuelli da Silva
Ramos, Valmor
Prá Steinbach, Morgana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv crenças
futuros professores
educação física
Beliefs
future teachers
physical education
topic crenças
futuros professores
educação física
Beliefs
future teachers
physical education
description BACKGROUND: Over the last twenty years, research on the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers has shown the influence of beliefs on curriculum decisions, the relationship between beliefs and pedagogical practices, the small contribution of undergraduate courses in changing beliefs, the contribution from previous experiences in pedagogical beliefs. In this context, synthesizing the main qualitative data can contribute to an understanding of the beliefs of future teachers in the context of initial training.OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-synthesis regarding the beliefs of future Physical Education teachers.METHODS: We performed a meta-synthesis, characterized as a systematic review methodology in which the results of qualitative studies. The results of the 9 original articles were analyzed and synthesized using the content analysis technique. The categories were determined a priori in: purposes, contents and strategies.RESULTS: There is a difference regarding beliefs about the purpose, while novice academics believe that Physical Education should focus on the physical and motor development of students, undergraduates believe that Physical Education can develop several aspects. Regarding beliefs about content, future teachers believe that technique should be privileged. Regarding beliefs about strategies, academics are divided into those who prefer analytical tasks and those who prefer global tasks.CONCLUSION: The difference in beliefs among future teachers is highlighted, allowing them to be classified as traditional and constructivist. Traditional people believe in the teaching and learning process centered on the teacher, in the purpose of Physical Education aimed at physical and motor development and in analytical tasks. Constructivists believe that students should actively participate in classes, have a more complex view of Physical Education, prefer to use global tasks and less directive types of instruction.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499
10.36453/cefe.2022.28499
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499
identifier_str_mv 10.36453/cefe.2022.28499
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/28499/20583
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhados
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhados
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-28499
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-28499
2318-5090
2318-5104
reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
collection Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br
_version_ 1798313412110843904