Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bagolin, Izete Pengo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Dias do Prado , Altevir
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620
Resumo: Given the scarcity of indicators for comparative analyses between countries and regions, the aim of the present article is to propose a multidimensional index of labor protection based on data from 152 countries. Thus, we seek to instrumentalize the debate on protection versus flexibility. The methodology selected to develop the MLPI was inspired by Sartoris (2003) and Hoffmann (1998). MLPI ranges from zero to one, and it allows ranking countries based on current labor legislations. According to the results, MLPI ranged from 0.182 (in Swaziland) to 0.729 (in Slovenia). The United States, which is often considered a flexible market example, ranked the 143rd position in this ranking (MLPI = 0.243) and Brazil recorded index of 0.583; it was featured as country presenting average protection/flexibility.
id UNISC-6_5f9e52e6c12dcea79c84912cb9db0f8c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/17620
network_acronym_str UNISC-6
network_name_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological propositionÍndice Multidimensional de Protección Laboral (IMPT): una propuesta metodológicaÍndice Multidimensional de Proteção Trabalhista (IMPT): uma proposição metodológicaÍndice de protecciónMercado laboralFlexibilidadÍndice de proteçãoMercado de trabalhoFlexibilidadeProtection indexLabor marketFlexibilityGiven the scarcity of indicators for comparative analyses between countries and regions, the aim of the present article is to propose a multidimensional index of labor protection based on data from 152 countries. Thus, we seek to instrumentalize the debate on protection versus flexibility. The methodology selected to develop the MLPI was inspired by Sartoris (2003) and Hoffmann (1998). MLPI ranges from zero to one, and it allows ranking countries based on current labor legislations. According to the results, MLPI ranged from 0.182 (in Swaziland) to 0.729 (in Slovenia). The United States, which is often considered a flexible market example, ranked the 143rd position in this ranking (MLPI = 0.243) and Brazil recorded index of 0.583; it was featured as country presenting average protection/flexibility.Dada la escasez de indicadores que permitan realizar análisis comparativos entre países y regiones, el objetivo de este artículo es proponer un índice multidimensional de protección laboral utilizando datos de 152 países. Así, buscamos instrumentalizar el debate sobre protección versus flexibilidad. La metodología para la construcción del IMPT se inspiró en Sartoris (2003) y Hoffmann (1998) y el índice - IMPT - varía entre cero y uno y permite clasificar a los países con base en la legislación laboral vigente. Los resultados muestran que el IMPT fluctuó entre 0,182 para Suazilandia y 0,729 para Eslovenia. EE.UU., generalmente considerado un ejemplo de mercado flexible, quedó en la posición 143, con un IMPT de 0,243 y Brasil obtuvo un índice de 0,583, que caracteriza a un país con protección/flexibilidad media.Diante da escassez de indicadores que permitam análises comparativas entre países e regiões o objetivo deste artigo é propor um índice multidimensional de proteção trabalhista utilizando dados de 152 países. Busca-se, assim, instrumentalizar o debate sobre a proteção versus flexibilização. A metodologia para construção do IMPT foi inspirada em Sartoris (2003) e Hoffmann (1998) e o índice – IMPT - varia entre zero e um e permite ranquear os países a partir das legislações trabalhistas vigentes. Os resultados mostram que o IMPT oscilou entre 0,182 para a Suazilândia e 0,729 para a Eslovênia. Os EUA, geralmente considerado um exemplo de mercado flexível, ficou na posição 143, com um IMPT de 0,243 e o Brasil obteve índice de 0,583, que caracteriza um país com proteção/flexibilidade média.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2022-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1762010.17058/redes.v27i1.17620Redes ; Vol. 27 (2022)Redes; Vol. 27 (2022)Redes; Vol. 27 (2022)Redes; v. 27 (2022)1982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporenghttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10785https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10786Copyright (c) 2023 Redesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBagolin, Izete PengoDias do Prado , Altevir2022-05-11T13:00:22Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/17620Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2022-05-11T13:00:22Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
Índice Multidimensional de Protección Laboral (IMPT): una propuesta metodológica
Índice Multidimensional de Proteção Trabalhista (IMPT): uma proposição metodológica
title Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
spellingShingle Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
Bagolin, Izete Pengo
Índice de protección
Mercado laboral
Flexibilidad
Índice de proteção
Mercado de trabalho
Flexibilidade
Protection index
Labor market
Flexibility
title_short Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
title_full Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
title_fullStr Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
title_sort Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
author Bagolin, Izete Pengo
author_facet Bagolin, Izete Pengo
Dias do Prado , Altevir
author_role author
author2 Dias do Prado , Altevir
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bagolin, Izete Pengo
Dias do Prado , Altevir
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Índice de protección
Mercado laboral
Flexibilidad
Índice de proteção
Mercado de trabalho
Flexibilidade
Protection index
Labor market
Flexibility
topic Índice de protección
Mercado laboral
Flexibilidad
Índice de proteção
Mercado de trabalho
Flexibilidade
Protection index
Labor market
Flexibility
description Given the scarcity of indicators for comparative analyses between countries and regions, the aim of the present article is to propose a multidimensional index of labor protection based on data from 152 countries. Thus, we seek to instrumentalize the debate on protection versus flexibility. The methodology selected to develop the MLPI was inspired by Sartoris (2003) and Hoffmann (1998). MLPI ranges from zero to one, and it allows ranking countries based on current labor legislations. According to the results, MLPI ranged from 0.182 (in Swaziland) to 0.729 (in Slovenia). The United States, which is often considered a flexible market example, ranked the 143rd position in this ranking (MLPI = 0.243) and Brazil recorded index of 0.583; it was featured as country presenting average protection/flexibility.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620
10.17058/redes.v27i1.17620
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/redes.v27i1.17620
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10785
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10786
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Redes
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Redes
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Redes ; Vol. 27 (2022)
Redes; Vol. 27 (2022)
Redes; Vol. 27 (2022)
Redes; v. 27 (2022)
1982-6745
reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br
_version_ 1800218774330146816

Registros relacionados