Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620 |
Resumo: | Given the scarcity of indicators for comparative analyses between countries and regions, the aim of the present article is to propose a multidimensional index of labor protection based on data from 152 countries. Thus, we seek to instrumentalize the debate on protection versus flexibility. The methodology selected to develop the MLPI was inspired by Sartoris (2003) and Hoffmann (1998). MLPI ranges from zero to one, and it allows ranking countries based on current labor legislations. According to the results, MLPI ranged from 0.182 (in Swaziland) to 0.729 (in Slovenia). The United States, which is often considered a flexible market example, ranked the 143rd position in this ranking (MLPI = 0.243) and Brazil recorded index of 0.583; it was featured as country presenting average protection/flexibility. |
id |
UNISC-6_5f9e52e6c12dcea79c84912cb9db0f8c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/17620 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-6 |
network_name_str |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological propositionÍndice Multidimensional de Protección Laboral (IMPT): una propuesta metodológicaÍndice Multidimensional de Proteção Trabalhista (IMPT): uma proposição metodológicaÍndice de protecciónMercado laboralFlexibilidadÍndice de proteçãoMercado de trabalhoFlexibilidadeProtection indexLabor marketFlexibilityGiven the scarcity of indicators for comparative analyses between countries and regions, the aim of the present article is to propose a multidimensional index of labor protection based on data from 152 countries. Thus, we seek to instrumentalize the debate on protection versus flexibility. The methodology selected to develop the MLPI was inspired by Sartoris (2003) and Hoffmann (1998). MLPI ranges from zero to one, and it allows ranking countries based on current labor legislations. According to the results, MLPI ranged from 0.182 (in Swaziland) to 0.729 (in Slovenia). The United States, which is often considered a flexible market example, ranked the 143rd position in this ranking (MLPI = 0.243) and Brazil recorded index of 0.583; it was featured as country presenting average protection/flexibility.Dada la escasez de indicadores que permitan realizar análisis comparativos entre países y regiones, el objetivo de este artículo es proponer un índice multidimensional de protección laboral utilizando datos de 152 países. Así, buscamos instrumentalizar el debate sobre protección versus flexibilidad. La metodología para la construcción del IMPT se inspiró en Sartoris (2003) y Hoffmann (1998) y el índice - IMPT - varía entre cero y uno y permite clasificar a los países con base en la legislación laboral vigente. Los resultados muestran que el IMPT fluctuó entre 0,182 para Suazilandia y 0,729 para Eslovenia. EE.UU., generalmente considerado un ejemplo de mercado flexible, quedó en la posición 143, con un IMPT de 0,243 y Brasil obtuvo un índice de 0,583, que caracteriza a un país con protección/flexibilidad media.Diante da escassez de indicadores que permitam análises comparativas entre países e regiões o objetivo deste artigo é propor um índice multidimensional de proteção trabalhista utilizando dados de 152 países. Busca-se, assim, instrumentalizar o debate sobre a proteção versus flexibilização. A metodologia para construção do IMPT foi inspirada em Sartoris (2003) e Hoffmann (1998) e o índice – IMPT - varia entre zero e um e permite ranquear os países a partir das legislações trabalhistas vigentes. Os resultados mostram que o IMPT oscilou entre 0,182 para a Suazilândia e 0,729 para a Eslovênia. Os EUA, geralmente considerado um exemplo de mercado flexível, ficou na posição 143, com um IMPT de 0,243 e o Brasil obteve índice de 0,583, que caracteriza um país com proteção/flexibilidade média.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2022-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1762010.17058/redes.v27i1.17620Redes ; Vol. 27 (2022)Redes; Vol. 27 (2022)Redes; Vol. 27 (2022)Redes; v. 27 (2022)1982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporenghttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10785https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10786Copyright (c) 2023 Redesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBagolin, Izete PengoDias do Prado , Altevir2022-05-11T13:00:22Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/17620Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2022-05-11T13:00:22Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition Índice Multidimensional de Protección Laboral (IMPT): una propuesta metodológica Índice Multidimensional de Proteção Trabalhista (IMPT): uma proposição metodológica |
title |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition |
spellingShingle |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition Bagolin, Izete Pengo Índice de protección Mercado laboral Flexibilidad Índice de proteção Mercado de trabalho Flexibilidade Protection index Labor market Flexibility |
title_short |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition |
title_full |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition |
title_fullStr |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition |
title_sort |
Multidimensional Labor Market Protection Index (MLPI): methodological proposition |
author |
Bagolin, Izete Pengo |
author_facet |
Bagolin, Izete Pengo Dias do Prado , Altevir |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dias do Prado , Altevir |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bagolin, Izete Pengo Dias do Prado , Altevir |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Índice de protección Mercado laboral Flexibilidad Índice de proteção Mercado de trabalho Flexibilidade Protection index Labor market Flexibility |
topic |
Índice de protección Mercado laboral Flexibilidad Índice de proteção Mercado de trabalho Flexibilidade Protection index Labor market Flexibility |
description |
Given the scarcity of indicators for comparative analyses between countries and regions, the aim of the present article is to propose a multidimensional index of labor protection based on data from 152 countries. Thus, we seek to instrumentalize the debate on protection versus flexibility. The methodology selected to develop the MLPI was inspired by Sartoris (2003) and Hoffmann (1998). MLPI ranges from zero to one, and it allows ranking countries based on current labor legislations. According to the results, MLPI ranged from 0.182 (in Swaziland) to 0.729 (in Slovenia). The United States, which is often considered a flexible market example, ranked the 143rd position in this ranking (MLPI = 0.243) and Brazil recorded index of 0.583; it was featured as country presenting average protection/flexibility. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620 10.17058/redes.v27i1.17620 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/redes.v27i1.17620 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10785 https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/17620/10786 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Redes info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Redes |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Redes ; Vol. 27 (2022) Redes; Vol. 27 (2022) Redes; Vol. 27 (2022) Redes; v. 27 (2022) 1982-6745 reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
collection |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br |
_version_ |
1800218774330146816 |