An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Patricia Santos de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Mendes, Enicéia Gonçalves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/128206
Resumo: What is the ideal training for specialist teachers? Would it be a specialized program from the beginning or a regular initial program combined with continuing specialized training? The answers to these questions are not supported by evidence since there are few studies focusing on this problem or comparing different training approaches. However, even without evidence that continuing education is the best model, much has been invested in continuing education policies, particularly in distance learning programs with short courses. On the other hand, there are also initiatives by a few universities offering programs with specialized initial training. Thus, the present study aimed to identify, describe and analyze undergraduate programs in special education at both public and private universities, with regard to their pedagogical project, course schedule and discipline program. In this documentary-exploratory study, we analyzed ten undergraduate programs in special education offered by eight universities, two of which were public and six private. According to our document analysis, the courses’ curricular frameworks have different characteristics since there are still no national curricular guidelines regulating the creation undergraduate programs in special education. Today, private institutions account for 75% of all universities offering these programs; however, the number of courses is insufficient for the needs of the Brazilian educational system. Therefore, it is necessary that the government take responsibility and prioritize the initial training of special education teachers.
id USP-11_a7d1f3ff1553f58f7698ca65414f3e4d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/128206
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special educationAnálise do projeto pedagógico e da grade curricular dos cursos de licenciatura em educação especialWhat is the ideal training for specialist teachers? Would it be a specialized program from the beginning or a regular initial program combined with continuing specialized training? The answers to these questions are not supported by evidence since there are few studies focusing on this problem or comparing different training approaches. However, even without evidence that continuing education is the best model, much has been invested in continuing education policies, particularly in distance learning programs with short courses. On the other hand, there are also initiatives by a few universities offering programs with specialized initial training. Thus, the present study aimed to identify, describe and analyze undergraduate programs in special education at both public and private universities, with regard to their pedagogical project, course schedule and discipline program. In this documentary-exploratory study, we analyzed ten undergraduate programs in special education offered by eight universities, two of which were public and six private. According to our document analysis, the courses’ curricular frameworks have different characteristics since there are still no national curricular guidelines regulating the creation undergraduate programs in special education. Today, private institutions account for 75% of all universities offering these programs; however, the number of courses is insufficient for the needs of the Brazilian educational system. Therefore, it is necessary that the government take responsibility and prioritize the initial training of special education teachers.Qual é a formação ideal para professores especializados? Seria uma formação especializada desde o início ou uma formação inicial comum agregada à formação continuada especializada? As respostas para estas questões não são respaldadas por evidências, pois são escassos os estudos que focalizam esse problema ou comparam as diferentes abordagens de formação. Entretanto, mesmo sem evidências de que esse seja o melhor modelo, muito se tem investido em políticas de formação continuada, majoritariamente, na modalidade a distância, com cursos de curta duração, enquanto que, paralelamente, há algumas iniciativas por parte de universidades que propõem cursos de formação inicial especializada. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo identificar, descrever e analisar os cursos de licenciatura em educação especial de universidades públicas e privadas, tomando como base os projetos pedagógicos de curso e as grades curriculares, bem como as ementas de cursos. Portanto, trata-se de um estudo documental do tipo exploratório. Foram analisados os dez cursos de licenciatura em educação especial existentes atualmente, oferecidos por oito universidades, duas públicas e seis privadas. A partir da análise dos documentos, foi possível considerar que os currículos dos cursos têm características diversas, pois ainda não existem parâmetros curriculares nacionais que norteiem a criação de cursos superiores em educação especial. As instituições particulares representam 75% do total de universidades que oferecem o curso, contudo, o número de cursos em vigência está aquém das necessidades do sistema educacional brasileiro. Portanto, torna-se necessário que o poder público se responsabilize e priorize a formação inicial do professor de educação especial.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/12820610.1590/s1517-9702201605145723Educação e Pesquisa; v. 43 n. 1 (2017); 264-279Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2017); 264-279Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 43 Núm. 1 (2017); 264-2791678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/128206/125129Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Patricia Santos deMendes, Enicéia Gonçalves2017-03-17T11:09:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/128206Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2017-03-17T11:09:05Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
Análise do projeto pedagógico e da grade curricular dos cursos de licenciatura em educação especial
title An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
spellingShingle An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
Oliveira, Patricia Santos de
title_short An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
title_full An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
title_fullStr An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
title_sort An analysis of the pedagogical project and curriculum of undergraduate licentiate programs in special education
author Oliveira, Patricia Santos de
author_facet Oliveira, Patricia Santos de
Mendes, Enicéia Gonçalves
author_role author
author2 Mendes, Enicéia Gonçalves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Patricia Santos de
Mendes, Enicéia Gonçalves
description What is the ideal training for specialist teachers? Would it be a specialized program from the beginning or a regular initial program combined with continuing specialized training? The answers to these questions are not supported by evidence since there are few studies focusing on this problem or comparing different training approaches. However, even without evidence that continuing education is the best model, much has been invested in continuing education policies, particularly in distance learning programs with short courses. On the other hand, there are also initiatives by a few universities offering programs with specialized initial training. Thus, the present study aimed to identify, describe and analyze undergraduate programs in special education at both public and private universities, with regard to their pedagogical project, course schedule and discipline program. In this documentary-exploratory study, we analyzed ten undergraduate programs in special education offered by eight universities, two of which were public and six private. According to our document analysis, the courses’ curricular frameworks have different characteristics since there are still no national curricular guidelines regulating the creation undergraduate programs in special education. Today, private institutions account for 75% of all universities offering these programs; however, the number of courses is insufficient for the needs of the Brazilian educational system. Therefore, it is necessary that the government take responsibility and prioritize the initial training of special education teachers.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/128206
10.1590/s1517-9702201605145723
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/128206
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1517-9702201605145723
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/128206/125129
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 43 n. 1 (2017); 264-279
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2017); 264-279
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 43 Núm. 1 (2017); 264-279
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713812080623616