Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bertolin, Julio Cesar Godoy
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6958
Resumo: In recent years, the expansion of higher education in Brazil has been based on the distance-education modality, especially in private, for-profit institutions. Considering that distance-education students generally belong to lower socioeconomic groups, analyzing this modality is fundamental in order to assess the equity of the system. Thus, in this paper, using the National Examination of Student Performance (Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes, Enade) database, I checked whether there are any differences in performance between the face-to-face and distance modalities. Through logical deduction between school effectiveness theory and comparisons of Enade averages, I have tried to demonstrate that face-to-face courses tend to provide better learning. In a context of unequal access and profiles, it is possible to deduce that the expansion of distance-education is reinforcing the iniquity of the system.
id FCC-1_7c66bc71eb4daed715edfab0da9b5dc9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/6958
network_acronym_str FCC-1
network_name_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education? ¿Existe diferencia de calidad entre las modalidades presencial y a distancia? Y a-t-il une difference de qualite entre les modalites d’enseignement presentiel et à distance ? Existe diferença de qualidade entre as modalidades presencial e a distância? Enseignement Supérieur QualitéEnseignement à DistanceInégalité SocialeEducación SuperiorCalidadEnseñanza a DistanciaDesigualdad Social Higher EducationQualityDistance Education Social InequalityEducação SuperiorQualidade do EnsinoEnsino a DistânciaDesigualdade Social In recent years, the expansion of higher education in Brazil has been based on the distance-education modality, especially in private, for-profit institutions. Considering that distance-education students generally belong to lower socioeconomic groups, analyzing this modality is fundamental in order to assess the equity of the system. Thus, in this paper, using the National Examination of Student Performance (Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes, Enade) database, I checked whether there are any differences in performance between the face-to-face and distance modalities. Through logical deduction between school effectiveness theory and comparisons of Enade averages, I have tried to demonstrate that face-to-face courses tend to provide better learning. In a context of unequal access and profiles, it is possible to deduce that the expansion of distance-education is reinforcing the iniquity of the system.En los últimos años, la expansión de la educación superior brasileña se ha basado en la modalidad a distancia (EAD), especialmente en instituciones privadas con fines de lucro. Como los estudiantes de educación a distancia generalmente pertenecen a grupos de menor estatus socioeconómico, analizar esta modalidad es fundamental para evaluar la equidad del sistema. Así, en este artículo, utilizando la base de datos del Examen Nacional de Desempeño de los estudiantes (Enade), se buscó verificar si existen diferencias en el desempeño entre las modalidades presencial y a distancia. Por medio de la deducción lógica entre la teoría de la efectividad escolar y comparaciones de los promedios de Enade, se trató de demostrar que los cursos presenciales tienden a proporcionar mejores condiciones de aprendizaje. En un contexto de acceso y perfil desigual, se puede deducir que la expansión de EAD está reforzando la iniquidad del sistema.Ces dernières années, l’expansion de l’enseignement supérieur brésilien s’est basée sur l’enseignement à distance, en particulier dans les établissements privés à but lucratif. Étant donné que les étudiants de l’enseignement à distance (EaD) appartiennent en général à des groupes de niveau socio-économique plus faible, l’analyse de cette modalité est fondamentale pour évaluer l’équité du système. Cet article a cherché à vérifier s’il existe des différences de performance entre les modalités présentielle et à distance, appuyé sur la base de données de l’Examen National de Performance des Étudiants (Enade). Par déduction logique entre la théorie de l’efficacité éducative et des comparaisons concernant les moyennes de l’Enade, nous avons voulu démontrer que les cours en présentiel ont tendance à offrir de meilleures conditions d’apprentissage. Dans un contexte d’accès et de profil inégal, il est possible de déduire que l’expansion de l’enseignement à distance renforce l’iniquité du système.Nos últimos anos, a expansão da educação superior brasileira tem se baseado na modalidade a distância, especialmente em instituições privadas com fins de lucro. Como estudantes de educação a distância (EaD) pertencem, em geral, a grupos de menor nível socioeconômico, analisar essa modalidade é fundamental para avaliar a equidade do sistema. Assim, neste artigo, utilizando a base de dados do Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes (Enade), buscou-se verificar se existem diferenças de desempenho entre as modalidades presencial e a distância. Por meio de dedução lógica entre teoria de eficácia escolar e comparações sobre médias do Enade, procurou-se demonstrar que cursos presenciais tendem a propiciar melhores condições de aprendizagem. Em um contexto de acesso e perfil desigual, é possível deduzir que a expansão da EaD está reforçando a iniquidade do sistema.Fundação Carlos Chagas2021-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6958Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 51 (2021); e06958Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 51 (2021); e06958Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 51 (2021); e06958Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 51 (2021); e069581980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6958/4190Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos de Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertolin, Julio Cesar Godoy2022-12-05T11:43:58Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/6958Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2022-12-05T11:43:58Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
¿Existe diferencia de calidad entre las modalidades presencial y a distancia?
Y a-t-il une difference de qualite entre les modalites d’enseignement presentiel et à distance ?
Existe diferença de qualidade entre as modalidades presencial e a distância?
title Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
spellingShingle Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
Bertolin, Julio Cesar Godoy
Enseignement Supérieur
Qualité
Enseignement à Distance
Inégalité Sociale
Educación Superior
Calidad
Enseñanza a Distancia
Desigualdad Social
Higher Education
Quality
Distance Education
Social Inequality
Educação Superior
Qualidade do Ensino
Ensino a Distância
Desigualdade Social
title_short Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
title_full Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
title_fullStr Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
title_sort Is there a quality difference between face-to-face and distance education?
author Bertolin, Julio Cesar Godoy
author_facet Bertolin, Julio Cesar Godoy
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bertolin, Julio Cesar Godoy
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Enseignement Supérieur
Qualité
Enseignement à Distance
Inégalité Sociale
Educación Superior
Calidad
Enseñanza a Distancia
Desigualdad Social
Higher Education
Quality
Distance Education
Social Inequality
Educação Superior
Qualidade do Ensino
Ensino a Distância
Desigualdade Social
topic Enseignement Supérieur
Qualité
Enseignement à Distance
Inégalité Sociale
Educación Superior
Calidad
Enseñanza a Distancia
Desigualdad Social
Higher Education
Quality
Distance Education
Social Inequality
Educação Superior
Qualidade do Ensino
Ensino a Distância
Desigualdade Social
description In recent years, the expansion of higher education in Brazil has been based on the distance-education modality, especially in private, for-profit institutions. Considering that distance-education students generally belong to lower socioeconomic groups, analyzing this modality is fundamental in order to assess the equity of the system. Thus, in this paper, using the National Examination of Student Performance (Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes, Enade) database, I checked whether there are any differences in performance between the face-to-face and distance modalities. Through logical deduction between school effectiveness theory and comparisons of Enade averages, I have tried to demonstrate that face-to-face courses tend to provide better learning. In a context of unequal access and profiles, it is possible to deduce that the expansion of distance-education is reinforcing the iniquity of the system.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6958
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6958
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/6958/4190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 51 (2021); e06958
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 51 (2021); e06958
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 51 (2021); e06958
Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 51 (2021); e06958
1980-5314
0100-1574
reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
collection Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1795330316955549696

Registros relacionados