The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376 |
Resumo: | This text examines and criticizes recent Brazilian Supreme Court verdict, not in definite yet, which judges legitimate the financial Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC) although giving partial origin to the direct action brought by the national industry confederation in order to “declare the unconstitutionality of expressions indicated in the relater’s readjusted vote”. The illegitimacy of legal prevision would be in the fact that the refereed compensation value “should be fixed proportionally to the environmental impact, after study in which adversary and legal defense are asseverated, prescinded the “percentage fixation on the costs of enterprise”. The act 9985, 2000, 18th july, created the national system of units of conservation in which units of “integral protection group” are inserted (art. 8º). The act determines the payment of a compensation to support them and its implantation and manutention will affect the respective receipt (art. 36, CAPUT). The text discuss the possibilities of interpretation of general clauses related to the case, boarding the limits of judicial power action and suggesting the best solution for the concrete case. |
id |
FGV-2_57a236fcc755c1a6ac9ebcd419b75991 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24376 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DFO Supremo Tribunal e a Compensação SNUC. A ADI 3.378-DFBrazilian Supreme CourtADINcompensationSNUCenvironmentimpactSTFADINCOMPENSAÇÃOSNUCMEIO-AMBIENTEIMPACTOThis text examines and criticizes recent Brazilian Supreme Court verdict, not in definite yet, which judges legitimate the financial Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC) although giving partial origin to the direct action brought by the national industry confederation in order to “declare the unconstitutionality of expressions indicated in the relater’s readjusted vote”. The illegitimacy of legal prevision would be in the fact that the refereed compensation value “should be fixed proportionally to the environmental impact, after study in which adversary and legal defense are asseverated, prescinded the “percentage fixation on the costs of enterprise”. The act 9985, 2000, 18th july, created the national system of units of conservation in which units of “integral protection group” are inserted (art. 8º). The act determines the payment of a compensation to support them and its implantation and manutention will affect the respective receipt (art. 36, CAPUT). The text discuss the possibilities of interpretation of general clauses related to the case, boarding the limits of judicial power action and suggesting the best solution for the concrete case. ESTE TEXTO EXAMINA E CRITICA RECENTE JULGAMENTO DO STF, AINDA NÃO DEFINITIVO, QUE JULGA LEGÍTIMA A CHAMADA COMPENSAÇÃO FINANCEIRA SISTEMA NACIONAL DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA NATUREZA (SNUC), EMBORA DANDO PARCIAL PROCEDÊNCIA À AÇÃO DIRETA AJUIZADA PELA CONFEDERAÇÃO NACIONAL DA INDÚSTRIA, PARA “DECLARAR A INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE DAS EXPRESSÕES INDICADAS NO VOTO REAJUSTADO DO RELATOR”. A ILEGITIMIDADE DA PREVISÃO LEGAL ESTARIA NO FATO DE QUE O VALOR DA COMPENSAÇÃO EM QUESTÃO “É DE SER FIXADO PROPORCIONALMENTE AO IMPACTO AMBIENTAL, APÓS ESTUDO EM QUE SE ASSEGUREM O CONTRADITÓRIO E A AMPLA DEFESA”, SENDO PRESCINDÍVEL A “FIXAÇÃO DE PERCENTUAL SOBRE OS CUSTOS DO EMPREENDIMENTO”. A LEI Nº 9.985, DE 18 DE JULHO DE 2000, CRIOU O SISTEMA NACIONAL DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO, NO BOJO DO QUAL SE INSEREM AS UNIDADES DO “GRUPO DE PROTEÇÃO INTEGRAL” (ART. 8º); EM APOIO ÀS MESMAS, A LEI DETERMINA O PAGAMENTO DE UMA COMPENSAÇÃO, A CUJA IMPLANTAÇÃO E MANUTENÇÃO ESTARÁ AFETADA A RECEITA RESPECTIVA (ART. 36, caput). O TEXTO DISCUTE AS POSSIBILIDADES DE INTERPRETAÇÃO DAS CLÁUSULAS GERAIS RELATIVAS AO CASO, ABORDANDO OS LIMITES DA ATUAÇÃO DO PODER JURISDICIONAL E SUGERINDO O QUE JULGA SER A MELHOR SOLUÇÃO PARA O CASO CONCRETO.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 125-146Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-146Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-1462317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376/23156Domingues, José Marcosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-07T15:06:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24376Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-07T15:06:41Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF O Supremo Tribunal e a Compensação SNUC. A ADI 3.378-DF |
title |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF |
spellingShingle |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF Domingues, José Marcos Brazilian Supreme Court ADIN compensation SNUC environment impact STF ADIN COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC MEIO-AMBIENTE IMPACTO |
title_short |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF |
title_full |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF |
title_fullStr |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF |
title_sort |
The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC): the ADIN 3.378-DF |
author |
Domingues, José Marcos |
author_facet |
Domingues, José Marcos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Domingues, José Marcos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Supreme Court ADIN compensation SNUC environment impact STF ADIN COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC MEIO-AMBIENTE IMPACTO |
topic |
Brazilian Supreme Court ADIN compensation SNUC environment impact STF ADIN COMPENSAÇÃO SNUC MEIO-AMBIENTE IMPACTO |
description |
This text examines and criticizes recent Brazilian Supreme Court verdict, not in definite yet, which judges legitimate the financial Compensation National System of Units of Natural Environment Conservation (SNUC) although giving partial origin to the direct action brought by the national industry confederation in order to “declare the unconstitutionality of expressions indicated in the relater’s readjusted vote”. The illegitimacy of legal prevision would be in the fact that the refereed compensation value “should be fixed proportionally to the environmental impact, after study in which adversary and legal defense are asseverated, prescinded the “percentage fixation on the costs of enterprise”. The act 9985, 2000, 18th july, created the national system of units of conservation in which units of “integral protection group” are inserted (art. 8º). The act determines the payment of a compensation to support them and its implantation and manutention will affect the respective receipt (art. 36, CAPUT). The text discuss the possibilities of interpretation of general clauses related to the case, boarding the limits of judicial power action and suggesting the best solution for the concrete case. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24376/23156 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 125-146 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-146 Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 125-146 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943708841771008 |